U.S. Ambassador Issues Bold Speech To U.N. Council, Demanding Them To Answer For Their Actions
Posted by Sam Di Gangi | Feb 21, 2017 | American Strength
Nikki Haley is standing boldly for the peaceful nation of Israel.
“I have to admit; it was a bit strange.”
These are the words that the United States Ambassador to the United Nations, Nikki Haley, has to say about the anti-Israel stances of most of the U.N. The meeting that the former South Carolina Governor attended was meant to discuss vital current world issues dealing with how to “maintain international peace and security” yet failed to address Hezbollah building rockets, something that is happening in Lebanon. Hezbollah, among praising Louis Farrakhan as he divides America, is well known as one of the biggest procurer’s of terrorism in the world.
Haley also notices a lack of leadership in how the fact that Latin America and the Middle East is getting a constant influx of weapons from Iran was never mentioned. There was apparently little or no serious talks about how to defeat ISIS (something that one would reason would be the first issue on the agenda) or even the idea of bringing Assad to justice for hundreds of thousands of his countrymen that she thinks that he is responsible (there is little to no evidence that Assad had anything to do with the deaths, in reality).
Israel is called a terrorist state by some because it defends its borders.
Still, her broader points about the fact that most of the United Nations are really only united in their hatred of Israel are all on target. There is going to be growing outcries for the U.S. to greatly limit our involvement with or to outright depart the U.N. more as this kind of Islamic tilted refusal to accept Israel grows within the body. This is because, as Haley said, “Instead, the meeting focused on criticizing Israel, the one true democracy in the Middle East,” she said, before adding about the long anti-Israel bias common within the U.N, “I’m here to say the United States will not turn a blind eye to this anymore. I’m here to underscore the ironclad support of the United States for Israel.” Haley came to actually DO her job, something the U.N. seems confused by.
This is going to make the leftists and Democrats of America utterly perplexed because these common sense views “of hate” are not coming from an “evil white Christian man” but rather, a very dark hued female Sikh. As a Sikh, someone who commonly gets confused with a Muslim when in traditional dress, she is aware of just what Islam is and how it is viewed and why. Sikh’s are not driven by western values or the “every man for himself” mindset, but rather, driven by purpose. With this as her goal and her motive, this daughter of migrants is speaking from the point of view of a minority, a female, and an expert on the matters of which she speaks.
The whole world mocks how the U.N. defends great evil when done against Israel.
She noted that the dual standards existent within the Security Council were “breathtaking,” something that has been noted by everyone BUT a U.S. Ambassador for far too long. Not afraid to call out the terror and evil that she sees being promoted and furthered within the United Nations, Haley bravely says, “Incredibly, the UN Department of Political Affairs has an entire department devoted to Palestinian affairs.”
Haley has sort of flown under the radar since the media noted that president Trump and Haley had aless than friendly discourse while he was trekking towards the White House and yet he chose her anyway, but now it is clear why he did so. With the talent and bold-faced honesty of which she so strongly speaks, the truths that she declares without reservation is nothing short of a breath of fresh air and something greatly needed from within America on the world stage.
The free world watched in stunned confusion as president Obama last ordered Israel to stop building on the West Bank (Jewish land) and the eastern part of Jerusalem (also rightful Jewish land). The line of thinking – if it can be called that – is that since the Palestinians have a problem with Israel having the land and since the Arabs can’t grasp the word “share” instead of “conquer,” then everyone is supposed to act as if this land is not rightfully Israel’s, which it is. Yes, both tribes were created first in that area, but the Jewish religion was the first established and rightful dweller of the land. When those that followed the path of Islam MANY years later fought the Jews and lost, that is what happens when someone loses a war. That land, therefore, is Jewish land both by birthright and victory.
Haley said that there was little talk about defeating the foe of the world, ISIS, at the United Nations. This may be why a growing number of people are calling for the U.S. to leave the U.N. for good.
Would Iran be as open about not building on its land? Maybe Iraq or Libya or Egypt would like to do what they expect Israel to do, yes? This is the kind of double standards that Haley is speaking up about. Instead of allowing the elephant to remain in the room another moment unaddressed, Haley said, “We will never repeat the terrible mistake of Resolution 2334 and allow one-sided security council resolutions to condemn Israel. Instead, we will push for action on the real threats we face in the Middle East.” By speaking honestly as she does, Haley is showing that while our public school textbooks may falsely teach that the U.N. supports democracy in the world as part of it’s charter, that charter is as worthless as the dust on the floor beside it.
Since America is a full member of the U.N. (which hopefully will change, though in this regard it helped), a veto from the United States is enough to stop anything like Resolution 2334 from happening while Trump is carefully steering the ship. Haley mentions that Israel is making new friends and business alliances every day, yet the Muslim world is bent upon stealing their land and calling it their own. No matter how often the lie is told it will not make the lie become a truth.
If what Nikki Haley reports about the U.N. remains the case, look for more petitions like this (pictured) to gain traction.
More than that, what would Islam do to the land if they did get it besides flush it into the Dark Ages mentality that is common for much of the Islamic world? Israel was a cesspool in the barren sand before Israel made it a wondrous and prosperous place. Israel attacks no one who does not attack them and that is why they are not at war with China, Russia, Ireland, or Canada.
No non-Islamic nation in the world is at war with Israel (though all sane peoples hate Zionists) because if Israel is not attacked they simply never attack anyone at all. Meanwhile, the world is running to the aid of radical Muslims who are at war with everyone who is not like them. Haley is not afraid to point this out and by doing so, she may have just highlighted the way to the exit sign for any U. S. leader wise enough to get the U.S. OUT of the United Nations for good.
This United Nations Usurp of America Will Boil Your Blood! Their Agenda Just Got a Green Light! BY LISA HAVEN on JUNE 6, 2016 • ( 2 )
By Lisa Haven
All of us should be outraged by the United Nations summit in Korea this week that adopted a global “action plan” demanding a planetary education regime that will brainwash our children into social-justice warriors and sustainability-minded world citizens.
In other words the UN will promote “merged development” of the “whole person” including their beliefs, values, spirituality and lifestyle. Their goal included indoctrinating our youth to understand their responsibilities to “protect the planet,” and promote the UN agenda for the “common good.” Meaning throw personal individuality and freedom out the door and accept the hive mentality of “the good of the whole.”
If that wasn’t bad enough it also details how they plan to integrate the New World Order concept into our youth by, “exploring ways and means by which education for global citizenship can be integrated into curricula and the agenda for education.”
Another disturbing document is UNESCO’s UN Decade of Education For Sustainable Developmentreport that lays out, in detail, what the summit in Korea was truly about—brainwashing citizens and our youth to be poor obedient “sustainability-minded, social-justice, world citizens.”
Probably the most shocking information contained in UNESCO’s report is found on page 12-13 which states:
“Generally, more highly educated people, who have higher incomes, consume more resources than poorly educated people, who tend to have lower incomes. In this case more education increases the threat to sustainability.” (pg.12)
The report further details:
“Simply educating the citizens [specifically the US] to higher levels is not sufficient for creating sustainable societies.” (pg.13)
In other words, they can’t “educate” the citizens to follow their agenda, therefore they brainwash our children and target the middle class. The more money you and I have, the worse off the “world” is, therefore it is their goal to force us into poverty and make us a lower poorer class of obedient zombies. Keep in mind this agenda has been promoted and accepted in a majority of countries—all of whom are dictators wanting to control their citizens and all of whom plan on keeping money in their pockets while taking ours.
But that’s not all! The report also details how they plan on “indoctrinating” children in the schools to accomplish the sustainable development agenda for the next generation:
“An important distinction is the difference between education about sustainable development and education for sustainable development. The first is an awareness lesson or theoretical discussion. The second is the use of education as a tool to achieve sustainability. In our opinion, more than a theoretical discussion is needed at this critical juncture in time. While some people argue that “for” indicates indoctrination, we think “for” indicates a purpose.” (pg. 9)
In other words instead of calling it what it truly is, indoctrination, lets put it under a new label and call it “purpose” because just educating people about isn’t good enough, they have to force it!
The report further details how the role of women is essential and they need their participation in order to accomplish more depopulation:
“The full participation of women is essential to achieve sustainable development….an educated woman tends to desire a smaller family size and seek the health care necessary to do so. She has fewer and healthier children.” (pg.11-13)
While I’m all for women being educated, you should not do this under the banner of attacking traditional values or forcing it on a population. There is nothing wrong with a stay-at-home parent, which is exactly what they are attacking in this section of the report.
Please understand the agenda here, they want to indoctrinate your youth and the world and make them into poor lower-class sustainable development zombies—which includes depopulation, the homosexuality agenda, abortion, socialism, freedom loss, bondage and tyranny.
In the video below I detail all of the above and a HECK of a lot more! If you’ve never seen a video of mine, this is the one to watch! As it is one of the MOST important I’ve done to date!
For More Information See:
Reasons to Get US Out! of the UN
Share This on Social Media!
Written by John F. McManus Wednesday, 06 April 2016
United Nations buildings, New York City
Support H.R. 1205, the American Sovereignty Restoration Act of 2015.
On August 13, 2015, UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon publicly called for the resignation of the top UN official in the Central African Republic. Citing sexual violence against the people perpetrated by UN peacekeepers in that landlocked country, Ban stated, “I can not put into words how anguished and ashamed I am by the recurrent reports over the years of sexual exploitation and abuse by UN forces.”
Ban shouldn’t have been suddenly horrified by such criminal activity. Rape and exploitation of defenseless women and children by UN peacekeepers is more the norm than the exception. Countries where such conduct had already occurred over the last decade include Haiti, Congo, Chad, Equatorial Guinea, South Sudan, Bosnia, East Timor, Ivory Coast, and the Central African Republic.
In the face of such a record, the world is supposed to look the other way and join in absurd insistence about how much the UN is needed. But Paula Donovan of the “AIDS-Free World” organization explains why little if anything is done to stop the atrocities. “If something isn’t going well in the world, you can blame the member states. But if something is not going well in the [UN] organization, everyone suppresses the bad news and doesn’t pass it along.”
There is, of course, far more to consider about the world body than the horrifying misconduct of its peacekeepers. The UN was established for the purpose of destroying national sovereignty and abolishing the personal freedom of every person on Earth. Operating under its charter formulated in 1945 by open Russian Communist Andrei Vyshinsky and secret U.S. Communist Alger Hiss, the UN has steadily grown in power and authority. Debating entry into the world body in the summer of 1945, the U.S. Senate approved the charter by a vote of 89 to 2, thereby placing our nation in the organization as one of its founders.
When the UN calls for, or when American leaders decide to engage in, military activity, subsequent action proceeds in the name of the UN itself, as in Korea in the 1950s, or more frequently in the name of the one of the UN’s “Regional Arrangements,” such as the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) or the Southeast Asia Treaty Organization (SEATO) as provided in the charter’s Articles 51-54. One of these UN subsidiaries, labeled SEATO, directed America’s defeat in the Vietnam War. Currently, the UN’s NATO now oversees the conflict in Afghanistan. Ever since the end of World War II, the U.S. hasn’t won a war (Korea, Vietnam, Iraq, Afghanistan), but our casualties have been more than a hundred thousand. Membership in the United Nations led to all those deaths and injuries without the victories that could have been achieved by unchained U.S. forces. A different but important kind of loss has been termination of the required constitutional declaration of war by Congress.
In his address to the UN in 1990, President George H.W. Bush showed his true loyalties when he stated, “It is the sacred principles enshrined in the United Nations Charter to which the American people will henceforth pledge their allegiance.” He’s never been alone in uttering such subversive nonsense. In 2001, Secretary of State Colin Powell journeyed to UN headquarters to proclaim, “With respect to U.S. policy, when it comes to our role as a member of the Security Council, we obviously are bound by UN resolutions.” He should have been fired, but he won praise. Far from being the only U.S. leaders to bow before the UN, Bush and Powell expressed the consistent attitude held by U.S. leaders ever since our country entered the UN in 1945. To them, their oath to abide by the U.S. Constitution means nothing.
Meanwhile, the supposedly “do nothing” UN is hard at work seeking and arranging for national disarmament, abolition of an individual’s right to keep and bear arms, unrestricted abortion, control of education, placement of refugees, termination of property rights, sovereignty-destroying trade pacts, environmental and population controls, and much more. And a parade of U.S. leaders stretching back to 1945 has cooperated with every seizure of power, every UN intervention in the domestic affairs of nations (clearly forbidden by the UN Charter), and the beginning steps contained in the UN’s Agenda 21 and Agenda 2030 programs. Anyone who removes the blinders can see the UN steadily gaining total control over everyone and everything.
All of this boils down to the shocking realization that our country isn’t being taken over by the world body; it is being delivered to the United Nations. Which means that we can do something about it. We can work to inform a sufficient number of fellow Americans who will demand that our country withdraw from the trap that has been laid for us, a trap into which our own leaders are steadily pushing our country.
Congress put America into the UN. Congress can and should take us out. In March 2015, Rep. Mike Rogers (R-Ala.) introduced H.R. 1205(the American Sovereignty Restoration Act of 2015) in the House of Representatives, calling for U.S. withdrawal from the world body. A companion measure is needed in the Senate. Even though H.R. 1205 was introduced over a year ago, there are still only six cosponsors in the House. It’s up to all of us that understand the threat posed by the United Nations, plus many more each of us can influence, to contact our representatives and senators and strongly urge that they cosponsor and pass H.R. 1205 to Get US Out! of the United Nations in the House and introduce, cosponsor, and pass a companion bill in the Senate.
Please phone your representive at 202-225-3121 and your senators at 202-224-3121 and urge them to cosponsor and pass H.R. 1205 in the House and a companion bill in the Senate to Get US Out! of the United Nations.
Please also email them with the same message.
Influence others in your sphere of influence to do likewise.
(This article was originally published with the same title in the May 2016 JBS Bulletin.)
UN REGIONALISM PUSH – BUILDING BLOCKS FOR WORLD GOVERNMENT REGIONALISM PRIMER
January 12, 2016
by Alex Newman - Bear Witness Central
The globalists hope to see nation states stuffed into regional blocs that are given ever-increasing authority, as a prelude to world government. The UN has been pursuing regionalism for quite some time, but what has not been reported is how regionalism is now baked into UN Agenda 2030 (sustainable development goals), the climate agreement recently reached in Paris and its ‘climate justice’ fund. The Truth will report on all this during January. We start with a regionalism primer:
The United Nations and the forces hoping to keep strengthening it are using regional integration and regional governance as a stepping stone toward what they call “global governance.” Examples of these regional governments abound. The European Union, of course, is the most prominent, but hardly the only one. The African Union, Vladimir Putin’s Eurasian Union, the Union of South American States, and many more regional integration schemes are all in various stages of development.
Behind it all is the UN and various internationalists such as former Secretary of State Henry Kissinger, who recently released a book titled World Order. “The contemporary quest for world order will require a coherent strategy to establish a concept of order within the various regions and to relate these regional orders to one another,” he explains in the book (emphasis in original). And that, in a nutshell, appears to be what is taking place worldwide.
It is not a new idea. In 1962, internationalist Lincoln Bloomfield prepared a report for the U.S. State Department entitled “A World Effectively Controlled by the United Nations.” In it, he explained how competition or even wars between regional super-regimes could dramatically accelerate the quest for global government. “A ‘normal’ historical process, in which ever-larger units evolve through customs unions, confederation, regionalism, etc., until ultimately the larger units coalesce under a global umbrella, could take up to two hundred years, on past performance figures, and even this may be optimistic,” wrote Bloomfield. “I have suggested that an alternative road may bypass the main path of history, short-circuiting the organic stages of consensus, value formation, and the experiences of common enterprise generally believed to underlie political community.” The plan, he said, “relies on a grave crisis or war to bring about a sudden transformation in national attitudes sufficient for the purpose.” Using such plotting, the “order” could “be brought into existence as a result of a series of sudden, nasty, and traumatic shocks,” Bloomfield explained. “Thus a hypothetical model can be constructed, fulfilling the characteristics of ‘a world effectively controlled by the United Nations.’ … We concluded that in theory it could come about in the short, medium, or long run by a brink of war — or a war — combined with the development of evolutionary trends that might favor it as the time span stretches out.” In other words, divide the world up into regions, then use various crises and even potentially war to encourage faster and deeper surrender of sovereignty.
The UN has been supporting the process every step of the way, with each of the regional unions, while purportedly independent, acknowledging the UN as being at the top. The regionalization of the planet into a handful of supranational regimes loyal to the UN is not an organic development. The UN has trained African officials on how to launch a continental “free trade” (i.e., supranationally managed trade) regime. Such regimes have typically served as the nucleus for regional governance. (The EU came from the European Free Trade Agreement, and so on).
Writer Alex Newman has been chronicling UN regionalization moves for years.
American Minute with Bill Federer
United Nations began to end future wars...
The United Nations officially began OCTOBER 24, 1945.
Its name coined by President Franklin Roosevelt.
The United Nations was created to prevent future wars.
Unfortunately, there have been nearly 150 wars with over 100 million casualties from the day the United Nations' charter was drafted in the Garden Room of San Francisco's Fairmont Hotel:
5 in Central Asia,
11 in South Asia,
20 in Southeast Asia,
13 in Eastern Europe,
23 in the Middle East,
25 in Latin & South America and
50 in Africa.
The Secretary-General at the United Nations Charter Conference in 1945 was Alger Hiss.
Alger Hiss was present at the Yalta Conference. February 4-11, 1945, where a large portion of Europe was put under the control of the Soviet Union.
Alger Hiss was later accused and convicted of being a Communist agent in publicized 1948 trial.
The person who accused Alger Hiss was a former Soviet spy Whittaker Chambers.
Islamic Conquest-Past and Present DVD
Soviet spy Whittaker Chambers had been senior editor of TIME Magazine before defecting to the United States.
After Whittaker Chambersdied, President Ronald Reagan awarded him the Medal of Freedom, March 26, 1984, stating:
"At a critical moment in our Nation's history, Whittaker Chambers stood alone against the brooding terrors of our age...
He became the focus of a momentous controversy in American history that symbolized our century's epic struggle between freedom and totalitarianism,
a controversy in which the solitary figure of Whittaker Chamberspersonified the mystery of human redemption in the face of evil and suffering."
The 185 member United Nations spends $20 billion annually, with the largest amount being contributed by United States.
Though 50 States comprise the United States of America, they are allowed only one combined vote, equivalent to the tiniest of nations.
After accusations of a U.N. Oil for Food Scandal and a U.N. Sex Scandal, the U.N. was pressured to release its first audit in 2005.
The U.N.'s Universal Declaration of Human Rights was rejected by the leaders of 57 Islamic countries, who formed their own group called the OIC - Organization of Islamic Cooperation.
In 1990, the OIC passed their 'Cairo Declaration on Human Rights in Islam' affirming Shariah law as supreme, with the death penalty for those leaving Islam, punishing women who are victims of rape, allowing men to be polygamous, permitting wife beating, and censoring speech insulting Islam.
The fourth President of the U.N. General Assembly, elected in 1949, was Philippine General Carlos Romulo, who had served with General Douglas MacArthur in the Pacific.
General Carlos Romulo, the first Asian to win a Pulitzer Prize, wrote:
"Never forget Americans, that yours is a spiritual country.
Yes, I know you're a practical people.
Like others, I've marveled at your factories, your skyscrapers, and your arsenals.
But underlying everything else is the fact that America began as a God-loving, God-fearing, God-worshiping people."
America's God and Country Encyclopedia of Quotations
Search AMERICAN MINUTE archives
Watch past FAITH IN HISTORY episodes for FREE
News from AmericanMinute.comInvite Bill Federer to speak - large or small groups - email firstname.lastname@example.org or call 314-540-1172
OBAMA ADMINISTRATION AND UN ANNOUNCE GLOBAL POLICE FORCE TO FIGHT ‘EXTREMISM’ IN U.S.
Anthony Behar-Pool/Getty Images
by PAMELA GELLER
2 Oct 2015
On Wednesday, Attorney General Loretta Lynch announced at the United Nations that her office would be working in several American cities to form what she called the Strong Cities Network (SCN), a law enforcement initiative that would encompass the globe.This amounts to nothing less than the overriding of American laws, up to and including the United States Constitution, in favor of United Nations laws that would henceforth be implemented in the United States itself – without any consultation of Congress at all.
The United Nations is a sharia-compliant world body, and Obama, speaking there just days ago, insisted that “violent extremism” is not exclusive to Islam (which it is). Obama is redefining jihad terror to include everyone but the jihadists. So will the UN, driven largely by the sharia-enforcing Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) and the pro-Islamic post-American President Obama, use a “global police force” to crush counter-jihad forces?
After all, with Obama knowingly aiding al-Qaeda forces in Syria, how likely is it that he will use his “global police force” against actual Islamic jihadists? I suspect that instead, this global police force will be used to impose the blasphemy laws under the sharia (Islamic law), and to silence all criticism of Islam for the President who proclaimed that “the future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam.”
What is a global police force doing in our cities? This is exactly the abdication of American sovereignty that I warned about in my book, The Post-American Presidency: The Obama Administration’s War on America. The Obama Department of Justice made it clear that it was exactly that when it distributed a press release last week announcing the “Launch of Strong Cities Network to Strengthen Community Resilience Against Violent Extremism.” In that press release, the DoJ complained that “while many cities and local authorities are developing innovative responses to address this challenge, no systematic efforts are in place to share experiences, pool resources and build a community of cities to inspire local action on a global scale.”
So if the local and municipal effort to counter the euphemistic and disingenuous “violent extremism” is inadequate and hasn’t developed “systematic efforts are in place to share experiences, pool resources and build a community of cities to inspire local action on a global scale,” the feds – and the UN – have to step in. Thus the groundwork is being laid for federal and international interference down to the local level. “The Strong Cities Network,” Lynch declared, “will serve as a vital tool to strengthen capacity-building and improve collaboration” – i.e., local dependence on federal and international authorities.
Lynch made the global (that is, United Nations) involvement clear when she added: “As we continue to counter a range of domestic and global terror threats, this innovative platform will enable cities to learn from one another, to develop best practices and to build social cohesion and community resilience here at home and around the world.”
This internationalist character was brought to the fore by the fact that the Strong Cities Network was launched on September 29 not at the White House or the Department of Homeland Security, or at the FBI headquarters or anywhere else that might be fitting for a national project, but at the United Nations.
Even more ominously, the DoJ press release says that the Strong Cities Network “will strengthen strategic planning and practices to address violent extremism in all its forms by fostering collaboration among cities, municipalities and other sub-national authorities.” Sub-national and international: the press release then quotes Governing Mayor Stian Berger Røsland of Oslo, Norway, a participant in the Strong Cities Network, saying: “To counter violent extremism we need determined action at all levels of governance. To succeed, we must coordinate our efforts and cooperate across borders. The Strong Cities Network will enable cities across the globe pool our resources, knowledge and best practices together and thus leave us standing stronger in the fight against one of the greatest threats to modern society.”
But what is that greatest threat, exactly? Remember, the DoJ presser says that the SCN will “address violent extremism in all its forms.” It also says that it will aid initiatives that are working toward “building social cohesion and resilience to violent extremism.” “Building social cohesion” is a euphemism for keeping peace between non-Muslim and Muslim communities – mostly by making sure that non-Muslims don’t complain too loudly about, much less work against, rapidly expanding Muslim populations and the Islamization of their communities.
The DoJ presser noted that at the launch of the Strong Cities Network, “welcoming remarks” would be offered by the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, Prince Zeid Ra’ad Al Hussein and Mayor Bill de Blasio of New York City. The involvement of New York City’s Marxist internationalist mayor is yet another warning sign.
Assert American sovereignty and individual rights. Contact your representatives now. Exhort them to oppose SCN now. Exhort them to keep America free – while it still is.
Pamela Geller is the President of the American Freedom Defense Initiative (AFDI), publisher of PamelaGeller.com and author of The Post-American Presidency: The Obama Administration’s War on America and Stop the Islamization of America: A Practical Guide to the Resistance. Follow her on Twitter here. Like her on Facebook here.