Don Jans' - BOOKS AVAILABLE HERE
Receive 5% discount
No shipping or handling charges
At Checkout Add Coupon Code: AM
Review of "The Road To Tyranny" "Your definition of Individualism and Collectivism was clear and relevant. I had heard about the slippery slope before, I now understand what it is and that it is real. You made so clear how our freedom and liberty are under attack. The book was easy to read and to understand. I really appreciate that you did not resort to “bumper sticker” attacks but stayed with reason and facts. I have purchased more books to give to people who would never otherwise be aware of what is happening.
June 5, 2018
What's Next Aileen ? - Don Jans, Author
The Road To Tyranny Individualism to Collectivism
SPEAKER INFORMATION CONTACT AT: MYGRANDCHILDRENSAMERICA@GMAIL.COM
Don Jans is a nationally acclaimed SPEAKER and AUTHOR contrasting the policies proclaimed by Karl Marx with the principles upon which our NATION WAS FOUNDED:
WHAT ATTRACTS PEOPLE TO COLLECTIVISM EVEN THOUGH IT ALWAYS FAILS
Collectivism is an all-encompassing term for the philosophies that have been identified with what is termed the left. Collectivism is what we call Marxism, Communism, Socialism, and Progressives. Collectivism is what the Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) Party of today is advocating. Collectivism advocates that the group or collective is supreme, and all policies and practices must be evaluated based on what they would deem to be in the best interest of the collective. This is in direct contrast to the philosophy upon which the United States is based; that is individualism. Individualism advocates that the rights of the individual are paramount and rights that are defined as natural rights such as life, liberty and property are not under the preview of man or government because they are rights granted by the Creator who is ultimate sovereign of all.
Individualism is the most difficult for the individual because individualism requires individual responsibility. For instance, the individual is responsible for their own decisions and it is the individual that must accept the consequences of their decision, good or bad. Individualism also stresses that the outcome is not final because the individual always has the right to and is encouraged to never settle. If the outcome was successful, they can and should strive to reach even higher. This is why the fabulous musician never stops practicing. This is why the researcher continues to do research. This is why the athlete continues to try to run faster, jump higher, or score the perfect 10. This is why the business person pursues better and more efficient methods of production or sales. This is why man has always looked beyond their known borders, be it mountains, plains, oceans, or space. The inner spirit of man is to reach for the stars and this is the heart of an individualist.
Collectivism stresses the collective over the individual. Collectivists believe the good of the collective is paramount. The collectivist believes it is the collective that should dictate the borders or the limits and those few individuals who would counter the perceived borders are damaging the good of the collective because they make the many within the collective who wish to settle, uncomfortable. The collectivist believes that the collective as a whole is responsible for all and that the responsibility of the individual is assumed by the collective.
The collectivist believes that the consequences of the decisions of the individual, good or bad, are the results of the actions of the collective as a whole. The collectivist believes that the family unit is a detriment to society because under the concept of the family unit, individuals are taught different values that may or may not coincide with the collective’s values. The collectivist believes all values should be taught in public institutions such as schools. The collectivist believes that the over achiever is detrimental to the collective as a whole because their achievement makes others within the collective uncomfortable. Thus, the collectivist would say that the person who prefers not to provide for his family or even himself is the result, not of the individuals making, but of the collective and is therefore the responsibility of the collective to provide for the individual. The collectives believe the bad behavior of a person is not the choice of the individual but the result of the collective as a whole and thus the responsibility of the collective and the individual should not suffer consequences for their bad behavior. The collectivist believes financial success of an individuals is not the result of choices made by the individual but is a result of decisions made by the collectivist community and thus financial success must be shared with all.
Individualism is a philosophy embraced by independent minded people like our founders. Individualism is embraced by self-reliant minded people. Individualism is embraced by those willing to accept the consequence of their own decisions, good or bad. Individualism is embraced by achievers. Individualism is embraced by truly compassionate people who love others and will encourage others to reach for the stars, that even failure is better than never striving but simply settling.
Collectivism is embraced by people who believe it is the duty and the right of government, or the so-called elite within society, to dictate to each individual what role they are to play in society and that their thoughts are only acceptable when they conform to the dictates of the elites. Karl Marx called this a classless society. A collectivist believes that they are relieved of their parental responsibility because it is the responsibility of the schools to teach their children morals and values. The collectivist believes it is the duty and obligation of the state to accept ultimate responsibility for the financial welfare of all. The collectivist believes that bad behavior is a result of society and not the decision of the individual. The collectivist believes that life, liberty, and property are granted by the state and thus the state should have complete control. The collectivist has no compassion for his fellow man because the collectivist deems the individual to be inadequate and must accept the role as determined by the elite.
Collectivism always fails. Collectivism denounces self-responsibility and self-reliance. Collectivism brings division, it breeds hatred, it promotes identity politics, it promotes victim hood, and it brings a government reliant society. Collectivism creates devastation and then promotes the policies that created the devastation as the policies that will rescue the devastated.
The only answer for recovery from the devastation created by the collectivist is the philosophy of individualism which proclaims our natural rights are from our Creator and under the domain of our Creator, that we are all responsible for our own decisions, and that true compassion and love is to give a helping hand. A helping hand is given through charity and has the expectation that the individual receiving the help will use that help to recover and then give a helping hand when another needs it. This is in direct contrast to the uncompassionate system of the collectivist or the government welfare system which is designed to create a slave or serf to the state which builds a permanent power base to maintain the control of the elite or state.
HOUSE REPUBLICANS CONTINUE DOWN THE SAME PATH
John Boehner and Paul Ryan fought the Conservative agenda for years. Both Boehner and Ryan pushed big spending Omnibus bills that skyrocketed the national debt and gave first Obama everything he wanted, and then gave Pelosi and Schumer. We have heard for years that the Republicans support the non-funding of planned parenthood because we were told the Republicans believed in the sanctity of life and not the murder of innocent unborn children. Planned Parenthood is still funded and continues to murder innocent children under the euphemism of a “women’s right to choose.”
The Republicans won the election in 2016 because they promised to close our borders. Many of us believed that meant that a wall would be built as promised by Ryan. Small amounts were funded so teasers could be built. Meanwhile Ryan turned away bills by other Republicans to truly fix the immigration mess. Ryan has talked about the stopping illegal immigration, but no wall is built, and huge dollars are spent every year, far more than the cost of the wall, to provide for these illegals.
Boehner and Ryan were the present to the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) that just kept on giving. Their sidekick, Kevin McCarthy, was with them all the way. Now the Republican House has elected McCarthy as Minority leader. Freedom and Independence lost under Boehner and Ryan and will continue to lose under McCarthy. McCarthy, in his remarks, sang the song as to how he would fight the Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) agenda and promote a Freedom Loving, Constitutional adhering agenda. McCarthy, we heard the same from your buddies, Boehner and Ryan.
It appears the house will be in danger in 2020, even if President Trump is at the top of the ticket. Ryan lost the house in 2018 and another Ryan is incapable of winning it back. We Freedom Loving Americans will be energized and tireless to set brush fires of freedom in the minds of Americans even more vigorously if we have dedicated Freedom Loving Americans leading the fight in the house.
I hope I am wrong, but it appears the Republican members of the house fall into Einstein’s definition of insanity; doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results.
LET US LEARN FROM THOSE WHO FORESAW THE EVIL OF COLLECTIVISM THE UNITED STATES NOW FACES
The Marxist movement has been alive and well in the United States for a long time, at least 100 years. The Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) are more open about their collectivist (Marxist, Communist, Socialist, Progressive) ideals than ever, even more now than in the days of FDR when his administration was dominated by members of the Communist Party of the United States. The Marxist/Progressives are advocating big government that dominates the lives of all citizens, central planning of the economy by government, government allocating resources per Marx, and transforming from receiving based on personal effort to receiving based on perceived need. The Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) are using the courts and the swamp that is Washington DC to accomplish their ends.
When I am perplexed about what is happening and what can be done to prevent the United States from becoming a collectivist (Marxist, Communist, Socialist, Progressive) nation, I look to the wisdom of those who formed the foundation of the United States based on Individualism. Individualism demands a capitalist system, rule of law, limited government, divided government, and sovereignty of the people. The Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) are transforming the United States from an Individualist nation to a collectivist (Marxist, Communist, Socialist, Progressive) nation. What they are doing is something that was foreseen by men with great minds. If we are to stop this collectivist (Marxist, Communist, Socialist, Progressive) movement we must learn why these great minds said it could happen and employ the principles they advocated, those of Individualism which promotes individual freedom and liberty.
The Warnings of Thomas Jefferson
During his two terms as President, Jefferson detected some evil and subversive trends which were luring the American people away from the original Constitution. Notice how direct he was in pointing the finger of accusation at the judiciary for corrupting the original constitutional plan: "Our government is now taking so steady a course as to show by what road it will pass to destruction, to wit, by consolidation first, and then corruption.... The engine of consolidation will be the federal judiciary; the two other branches the corrupting and corrupted instruments." In other words, the Supreme Court uses its judicial mandates to draw more and more power to Washington; then the Congress and the Executive use this new power to shatter the Constitution and corrupt the dual federalism which was designed to balance the political powers between the government and the states. Once Jefferson's distant cousin, John Marshall, became chief justice of the Supreme Court, Marshall set himself and his associates up as the "final arbiter" on all constitutional issues. Nowhere in the Constitution was the federal judiciary given the power to enforce its will on the states or the other two federal departments. Jefferson had the Supreme Court in his gun sights when he wrote: "The great object of my fear is the federal judiciary. That body, like gravity, ever acting with noiseless foot and unalarming advance, gaining ground step by step and holding what it gains, is engulfing insidiously the [state] governments into the jaws of that [federal government] which feeds them."
The Warnings of James Madison
Madison was known to be the philosophical soul-mate of Thomas Jefferson, but sometimes his contemporaries considered him somewhat paranoid and suffering from fears for the nation that would never happen. But the passing of time was to prove him more insightful than many of his contemporaries had thought. He said: "If Congress can employ money indefinitely, for the general welfare, and are the sole and supreme judges of the general welfare, they may take the care of religion into their own hands; they may appoint teachers in every state, county, and parish, and pay them out of the public treasury; they may take into their own hands the education of children, the establishing in like manner schools throughout the union; they may assume the provision of the poor.... Were the power of Congress to be established in the latitude contended for, it would subvert the very foundations, and transmute the very nature of the limited government established by the people of America."
The Warnings of Alex De Tocqueville
In 1830 a young judge from France arrived in America. His name was Alexis de Tocqueville. He came to study the American system. He and his friend soaked up more information about the great American experiment in ten months than most scholars absorb in a lifetime. Returning to France, Alexis de Tocqueville wrote a two-volume work entitled, Democracy in America . De Tocqueville saw the people of the United States passing through several distinct stages. First of all, he saw the strength of character and moral integrity that would make them prosperous. But as they became self-sufficient he saw that they would be less concerned about each other and much less concerned about the principles that made them a great people. This would leave them vulnerable to the manipulation of clever politicians who would begin to promise them perpetual security if they accepted certain schemes contrived by some of their leaders. He then described what modern students have been led to identify as "democratic socialism.": "That power is absolute, minute, regular, provident, and mild. It would be like the authority of a parent, if, like that authority, its object was to prepare men for manhood; but it seeks on the contrary to keep them in perpetual childhood; it is well content that the people should rejoice, provided they think of nothing but rejoicing. "For their happiness such a government willingly labors, but it chooses to be the sole agent and the only arbiter of that happiness; it provides for their security, foresees and supplies their necessities, facilitates their pleasures, manages their principal concerns, directs their industry, regulates the descent of property, and subdivides their inheritances -- what remains, to spare them all the care of thinking and the trouble of living." "After having thus successively taken each member of the community in its powerful grasp, and fashioned them at will, the supreme power then extends its arm over the whole community. It covers the surface of society with a network of small complicated rules, minute and uniform, through which the most original minds and the most energetic characters cannot penetrate, to rise above the crowd. "The will of man is not shattered, but softened, bent, and guided -- men are seldom forced by it to act, but they are constantly restrained from acting. Such a power does not destroy, but it prevents existence; it does not tyrannize, but it compresses, enervates, extinguishes, and stupefies a people, till [the] nation is reduced to be nothing better than a flock of timid and industrious animals, of which the government is the shepherd." Are not these warnings sobering? Can we not see every one of them in fulfillment today? Yet in spite of all these dire predictions, the Founders assured us there is a manifest destiny for America that would cause her to rise from the ashes. It is this prophecy that keeps us going. Is each of us doing all we can to help? Have you had a seminar for your friends in your area yet? Can you spare a little of your resources to help us continue? Thank you for all you do or will do.
SHE WRITES GOALS OF MARXIST/PROGRESSIVES (DEMOCRATS)
GA Teaching Aide Calls for ‘Dismantling’ the Church, Says It Makes ‘Crappy White People’
A teaching assistant at the University of Georgia Facebook posts targeted toward white people and suggested dismantling “churches, schools, and families.”
There is always a degree of left-wing lunacy that you can expect from America’s colleges, but professors and students seem to be getting crazier by the day.
Irami Osei-Frimpong, a Ph.D. student and teaching assistant at the University of Georgia, made several Facebook posts explicitly attacking Christians and white people, Campus Reform reported.
In a public post, Osei-Frimpong suggested an idea to deal with “crappy” white people who push “voter suppression” and “voter ID laws.”
In Twitter she wrote:
“We can talk about voter suppression. We can talk about voter ID laws. But all of this begins and ends with the fact that we make crappy White People. So, if we are serious, we have to dismantle the institution that make crappy White People: their churches, their schools, their families.”
This is exactly what Karl Marx said was necessary. Marx explained that the core society must be destroyed so the new classless society could be rebuilt. This is the exact plan Lenin put into practice. This is what the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) have had as their goal since at least the days of Wilson.
Finally, a Comrade sates their plans for all America to read. Marx said that any who would not conform to his ideology must be eliminated so a classless (one class) and totally conforming society would exist. Marx said that the schools must be run by the state and they must be indoctrination systems and not education systems. Marx said the new society must be an atheist society and all religion must be abolished. Marx said the core family must be eliminated. All children belonged to the state and only the state would be allowed to instill values in the children.
Lenin eliminated the Eastern Orthodox religion from Russia, a religion that had been a part of Russia since the founding of Muscovy. Lenin set about the destroying the core family in Russia by allowing and encouraging abortion, allowing and encouraging adultery, and allowing and encouraging divorce. Lenin established state schools and used them as indoctrination centers. All Marxist takeovers have followed the teachings of Marx and have used Lenin’s example for establishment of a Marxist totalitarian state.
The Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) have followed the teachings of Marx and have used what Lenin did as their roadmap. This lady put into a tweet what Wilson, Franklin Roosevelt, Obama, and all their Comrades want.
The core ideology of the Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) Party opposes all the core principles upon which our nation was founded; individualism, rule of law, limited government, divided government, and sovereignty of the people.
Those of you who claim to be loyal Americans and a member of the Democrat Party, must realize that your party abhors the Declaration of Independence, the Constitution of the United States, and the Bill of Rights. The Declaration of Independence states that our rights come from God and not from the state. The Declaration of Independence establishes that the people are sovereign. The Constitution of the United States establishes rule of law, limited government, and divided government. The Bill of Rights specifically protects the natural rights given to us by God and not government including but not limited to speech and religion.
You who would claim you believe in the principles outlined in our core documents and vote for Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) are claiming one thing but enabling the exact opposite. You must determine if you truly value freedom and liberty. You must study the ideology of Marx. The only conclusion you can reach is that your party is not the Democrat party but the Marxist/Progressive party that is determined, as Obama stated, to fundamentally transform the United States into a Marxist totalitarian state.
You who would claim you believe in the principles outlined in our core documents and vote for those who are not Marxist/Progressives, must study the evil that is Marxism. You must then become a diligent and tireless person who is dedicated to set brush fires of freedom in the minds of your fellow Americans.
NO LIBERTY WITHOUT VIRTUE
That the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) have been abolishing our long-standing principles as outlined in our founding documents, The Declaration of Independence, The Constitution of the United States, and The Bill of Rights, is documented fact. A few examples would be Obama singing DACA which clearly is a violation of separation of powers, growing an unlimited government which is a direct attack on limited government, not prosecuting either Clinton or Comey for violating laws dealing with classified information and encouraging people to lie about Kavanaugh and then claiming he had the burden of proof is a clear violation of “rule of law.” Examples abound and extend back at least 100 years.
Any rational person cannot argue against this fact. It is clearly documented. I have known this for many years, so with recent attacks by Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) in encouraging fraudulent voting and then following the communist methods of running elections, which is again not new but a part of their strategy for decades, I tried to decipher why I had such an uncomfortable feeling after the recent election. Yes, the fraudulent voting was repeated again, and the communist methods of running elections is on full display, but my discomfort was greater than ever.
In trying to come to grips with this, it finally dawned on me what was obvious. Yes, all the tactics of the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats), encouraging MOB intimidation, employing to the full extent the tactics of Saul Alinsky, practicing their core rule of “the ends justify the means" to name a few, where all in full force. Then while speaking the other evening, I was discussing Karl Marx’s call for the abolition of all morality. Yes, it is evident that the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) have called for immorality for years in social issues, financial issues, and governance issues for years, but now they have taken their practice of promoting fraudulent voting and communist vote counting to new heights.
Our nation has endured the assault of the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) so far, but what was at the core of my discomfort was revealed in the article below. When I found this article and read it, I knew that the blatant attack on the heart of our freedom, our elections and our peaceful transfer of power, was destroying those core elements of our liberty. The Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) are demolishing both. At the heart of these attacks on such core issues is the fact that the Marx dictate of abolishing all morality by his followers is real. An election official officially tells a non-citizen they can vote. She does not even try to hide it. The same official openly destroys votes and openly creates votes. What she has done in Broward County was now becoming a common practice elsewhere, such as in Arizona, California, and perhaps many other states. The virtue of election officials, along with Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) officials is now open and praised by the officials of the Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) Party so long as the ends justify the means.
No Liberty without Virtue
To our Founding Fathers it was obvious, or “self-evident,” that self-government, or a democratic republic, could only be perpetuated by the self-governed. Reflecting these precepts, a contemporary German writer to the Founders, J. W. von Goethe, stated: "What is the best government? -- That which teaches us to govern ourselves." And, a later, prominent 19th Century minister, Henry Ward Beecher, simply said: “There is no liberty to men who know not how to govern themselves.” Self-governance consists of self-regulation of our behavior, ambitions and passions. To this end, the Founders fundamentally believed that the ability to govern ourselves rests with our individual and collective virtue (or moral character).
John Adams stated it this way, “Public virtue cannot exist in a Nation without private Virtue, and public Virtue is the only Foundation of Republics.” In this regard, the revolutionary war was as much a battle against “the corruption of 18th century British high society,” as it was against financial oppression. While the Founders and American colonists were very concerned with their civil liberty and economic freedom, demanding “no taxation without representation,” they were equally concerned with their religious liberty, particularly in preserving their rights of individual conscience and public morality. With respect to the vital need for virtue in order to establish and maintain a republic, the Founders were in complete harmony:
George Washington said: “Virtue or morality is a necessary spring of popular government,” and “Human rights can only be assured among a virtuous people.”
Benjamin Franklin said: “Only a virtuous people are capable of freedom.”
James Madison stated: “To suppose that any form of government will secure liberty or happiness without any virtue in the people, is a chimerical [imaginary] idea.”
Thomas Jefferson wrote, “No government can continue good but under the control of the people; and … their minds are to be informed by education what is right and what wrong; to be encouraged in habits of virtue and to be deterred from those of vice … These are the inculcations necessary to render the people a sure basis for the structure and order of government.”
Samuel Adams said: “Neither the wisest constitution nor the wisest laws will secure the liberty and happiness of a people whose manners are universally corrupt. He therefore is the truest friend of the liberty of his country who tries most to promote its virtue.”
Patrick Henry stated that: “A vitiated [impure] state of morals, a corrupted public conscience, is incompatible with freedom.”
John Adams stated: “We have no government armed with power capable of contending with human passions unbridled by morality and religion. Avarice, ambition, revenge, or gallantry would break the strongest cords of our constitution as a whale goes through a net. Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.”
Virtue ennobles individual character and lifts society as a whole. Virtuous principles eschew prejudice and discrimination, confirming that “all men are created equal.” Virtue encompasses characteristics of goodwill, patience, tolerance, kindness, respect, humility, gratitude, courage, honor, industry, honesty, chastity and fidelity. These precepts serve as the cornerstones for both individual happiness and societal governance.
WHY MARXIST/PROGRESSIVES (DEMOCRATS) FIGHT AGAINST VOTER ID
The Collectivist (Marxist, Communist, Socialist, Progressive, Democrat) movement is alive and well in the United States. Wilson was perhaps the first openly Collectivist Head of State for the United States. Franklin Roosevelt had an administration filled with people who were members of the Communist Party of the United States including the person who ran the FDR regime, Harry Hopkins. Comrade Obama, a dedicated Communist was educated in communism by Frank Marshall Davis and the individual who ran his regime, Valerie Jarrett, is also a dedicated communist. The Collectivist movement has constantly argued that to require voters to show ID when voting is racist and is not democratic. Remember, for voting purposes, the Marxist/Progressives define democratic as allowing citizens, illegal aliens, dead people, imaginary people, and pets to vote. The Marxist/Progressives would have us believe it is even more democratic if their voters are able to vote early and often.
We are once again seeing, in Florida and Arizona, what the Marxist/Progressives refer to as a democratic election. We are learning of miraculous discoveries of votes that somehow came up from the depths of the earth, perhaps even from Satin himself who should certainly be allowed to vote, that suddenly move their candidates into the lead. This is reminiscent of votes in the Soviet Union and most recently Venezuela. Yes, just like in those Collectivist countries, the Marxist/Progressives of the United States believe a truly democratic election should enable them to announce the results of the election, days before the election takes place, especially where they oversee the vote count, like in Broward and Palm Beach Counties in Florida.
The Florida official put in charge of counting votes in Broward County — the most liberal county in the state — for the gubernatorial and Senate race previously destroyed voter ballots, a judge ruled, and was most recently accused of not removing dead voters from the voter rolls.
Broward County Board of Elections Supervisor Brenda Snipes is in charge of vote counting in the area and has yet to disclose how many ballots are still not counted despite the election for governor and Senate occurring two days ago.
Currently, in the Senate race, Republican Rick Scott is leading Marxist/Progressive incumbent Bill Nelson by more than 20,000 votes. Nelson is hoping for a blowout in Broward County to push him over the edge for re-election.
Snipes was confronted by local media about why the vote count in Broward County has taken so long. “Could I please get a moment to go into the room and find out?” Snipes asked the group huddled around her. “OK, when I come back I’ll let you know.”
“But, Dr. Snipes, it is now Thursday,” Weinsier said. “We are still counting ballots in Broward County.”
“We’re counting five pages or six pages for each of the people who voted,” Snipes said.
“But other counties have been able to do it,” Weinsier said.
In May, a judge ruled that Snipes had violated state and federal law after she destroyed voter ballots in the state’s 2016 congressional election. In the race, former Democratic National Convention (DNC) Chairwoman Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz won re-election by less than 7,000 votes against Democrat primary challenger Tim Canova.
The next year, when Canova asked to review the paper ballots in the race, it was revealed that Snipes destroyed the ballots only 12 months after the primary. Federal and state law mandates that ballots not be destroyed until 22 months after an election.
The case exposed that Snipes’ staff had opened ballots in private in 2016 on election day.
This my Freedom Loving Americans is the definition of a fair and legal election as defined by the Marxist/Progressives; the election is not completed until we have miraculously “discovered” or have destroyed enough votes to have a fellow Comrade, a Comrade we know will advance the Fundamental Transformation of the United States to a Marxist totalitarian state, declared the winner. By hook or by crook, it does not matter because “the ends always justify the means.” Remember, Marx told these people that all morality, even honesty, must be destroyed so the movement down the road of “HOPE AND CHANGE” can continue until it reaches the glorious communist, classless, conforming, and equal Marxist totalitarian state.
The Marxist/Progressives understand that requiring voters to show ID to prove they are legal citizens and who they say they are will greatly impede their efforts to destroy the Declaration of Independence, The Constitution of the United States, and the Bill of Rights; documents whose principles they despise.
THE BLUE WAVE NEVER MATERIALIZED BUT NOT BECAUSE OF LACK OF EFFORT ON THE PART OF THE COLLECTIVIST (MARXIST, COMMUNIST, SOCIALIST, PROGRESSIVE, DEMOCRAT)
This is a fact, and that is good. However, the fight for freedom and liberty is real and continues. The Marxist/Progressive movement has become the main core, no, it is now at least 99.9% of the Democrat Party. Lenin set about as a main goal of his to dominate at least one of the American parties. He did not live to see it, but the work he began was an overwhelming success. We Freedom Loving Americans must take to heart the words of the Father of the Revolution, Sam Adams, when he told us it does not take a majority to prevail but a tireless minority keen on setting brushfires of freedom in the minds of men.
Lenin also understood that to complete the process of “Hope and Change” it would be necessary to infiltrate and capture in America, the education system, the media, and the entertainment industry. He did not live to see it, but his efforts have proven to be overwhelmingly successful. Now the head of the Marxist/Progressive Party, Tom Perez, has said, his party, the Marxist/Progressives, need to keep working on voters. This means the Marxist/Progressives must step up their indoctrination process which includes teaching to the lowest achievers which pulls down the performance of all, which is always the result of collectivists (Marxist, communist, socialist, progressive) programs.
As a result, we hear comments like, “The Senate was lost because of gerrymandering” which was made by an oft quoted and greatly admired spokesperson for the Marxist/Progressive movement, Joy Behar. What is truly sad is that most Americans and the overwhelming number of those who voted blue in this election have no idea why that is a ridiculous statement. It does speak volumes for the American indoctrination system and the collectivist mandate of always educating to the lowest common denominator which results in a downward spiral of the society.
The Marxist/Progressives have also advocated, along with Marx, for centralized control of a public-school system. Common Core was introduced as the savior of education in America. It is fulfilling the goals of the Marxist/Progressive agenda by teaching to the lowest common denominator. It is also destroying the future of a free, independent, and prosperous America. This is the goal of the Marxist/Progressives.
This is an article that illustrates very clearly why the Marxist/Progressives overwhelmingly support and champion Common Core.
Nearly 1 Decade Later, We Finally See Full Damage of Common Core
I dunno ’bout you, but as a millennial, I don’t get what the big commodition about Common Core is. Everyone seems to be all mad that Barack Obama changed our educational system and stuff. I mean, the dude was the president of the United Airlines. Who better than him to tell us kids what we should be learning ‘n stuff?
I can remember him announcing it just nine years ago. I remember it clearly because my dad turned on that show called the news or whatever (I think it’s a reality program or something, because it’s on every night, but nobody never gets to vote nobody off or anything. That really stinks because that creepy George Snuffleupagus guy definitely needs to go).
“If you set and enforce rigorous and challenging standards and assessments; if you put outstanding teachers at the front of the classroom; if you turn around failing schools — your state can win a Race to the Top grant that will not only help students outcompete workers around the world, but let them fulfill their God-given potential,” I think he said. I just looked it up on my iPhone or whatever, and that sounds about right.
Anyways, he said that stuff back in 2009 and I was like, “Can we turn back to ‘Wild ‘n Out’ already, dad? It’s like, I’ve been watching this for like at least three minutes and I haven’t seen that Obama dude or Chester Hold or whatever get kicked in someplace uncomfortable.”
Well, I was young back then, but apparently this Commoner Core thing was supposed to help me fulfill my dog-given potential or something. I think it did pretty well, if you ask me — I’ve figured out the best sites on the dark web where you can buy term papers from and all that. But apparently, all of these conservatismists who still think there are less than 10 genders all say the program is screwing up or something.
Take this woman Joy Pullmann, editor at something called The Federalist and author of “The Education Invasion: How Common Core Fights Parents for Control of American Kids.” That thing sounds like a real buzzkill and it didn’t even have any pictures when I looked at a preview of it on Amazon, so you can forget about me buying it. I’m still only about halfway through that Trevor Noah book with all of Trump’s tweets, anyway.
But anyway, my friend Brock from the College Republicans sent me this thing she wrote this week and it sounds like she actually thinks Obama screwed up with this whole Core thing or whatever.
I figured she was a racist or something, since my teacher said everyone who doesn’t agree with Obama is usually heavy into bigamy, but she kept on using all these words that totally didn’t sound like she was a KKKK member.
“So here we are, nine years later. Common Core has been officially rolled out into U.S. public and even many private schools for at least three to five years now,” this Pullman lady wrote. “Are American children increasingly prepared for the ‘the challenges of the 21st century’? We’re actually seeing the opposite. They’re increasingly less prepared. And there’s mounting evidence that Common Core deserves some of the blame.”
What? How bad could it be? Well, apparently it’s reduced our scores on the SAT and the ACT-UP tests or something.
“ACT scores released earlier this month show that students’ math achievement is at a 20-year low. The latest English ACT scores are slightly down since 2007, and students’ readiness for college-level English was at its lowest level since ACT’s creators began measuring that item, in 2002. Students’ preparedness for college-level math is at its lowest point since 2004,” she wrote.
“SAT scores also dropped post-Common Core until it fully implemented a new version tailored for Common Core. How convenient. Even after the test was overhauled to match Common Core, average test scores increased by 0.7 percent in the most recent results. It represents almost no difference to pre-Common Core results, and the public can’t know exactly how the scores were recentered and altered, either.”
Yeah, but that’s just tests, right? I mean, I can read and rithmatic real good and so can everyone else I know.
But that’s not what Pullmann said: “Almost a year ago I wrote about the latest round of international tests that publish every five years. They showed U.S. fourth graders declining on reading achievement. The 2015 results on the most reliable nationwide U.S. test showed the ‘first ever significant decline of 2-3 points — about a quarter of a grade-level worth – in mathematics at both grades 4 and 8, and in grade 4 reading.” The next iteration of that test showed no gains again.
“During the Obama administration, writes Harvard professor Paul Peterson, ‘No substantively significant nationwide gains were registered for any of the three racial and ethnic groupings in math or reading at either 4th or 8th grade.’”
Oh yeah, and there’s a bunch of other stuff about how we’re being indoctrinated and stuff. Which, duh, I’ve been receiving my indoctrinations for years. Mom makes me get flu shots every winter.
“Just recently, Rick Hess and Grant Addison wrote about what’s happened to people who have worked for and led organizations that received millions from Obama’s Common Core grants and from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, which also bankrolled Common Core,” Pullmann wrote.
“At its annual Standards Institute, a prominent conference to teach teachers how to teach Common Core, the organization UnboundEd ‘slathers its Common Core workshops with race-based rancor and junk science,’ providing a ‘snapshot … into the ongoing transformation of ‘school reform.’
“To keep their teaching licenses, many teachers have to regularly attend conferences like these for usually taxpayer-sponsored ‘professional development.’ Nowadays teacher licensing mandates often specifically require teachers to learn Common Core-themed things. So basically, to keep their jobs, teachers have to learn more about Common Core.”
Pfft, whatevs dude. I’m fine hearing about all of the 72 genders. Learning about what “maverique” is sure beats doing actual schoolwork. If that’s what Common Core is all about, then count me in. Apparently people want to vote in politicians that would undo all of this and make us do like, actual studying. What kind of nonsense is that?
Now, excuse me, but I’ve got to kick it — I need to buy me a paper about the American Revolutionary War. Did you know we used to like, actually be British until we weren’t? That’s friggin’ wild, man. Can’t wait to read about it when I get the report.
INITIAL THOUGHTS ON THE MORNING AFTER
The United States of America is a divided country. This is no great revelation, but the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) have come out of the closet and openly have declared they are a Collectivist (Marxist, Communist, Socialist, Progressive) Party supporting and promoting the “Communist Manifesto” written by Marx and Engels, and followed by others such as Lenin and Trotsky, Mao, Castro, and Chavez.
Marx said that as the road of “Hope and Change” was followed so a society could achieve a totally conforming and equal classless society, all long standing principles must be abolished, all morality must be abolished, and God must be eliminated – Marx said God does not exist – so an atheist society must be established. Observant and aware people were cognizant that this was the underlying platform of the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats), but in this election the “Communist Manifesto” became the overwhelming platform of their nominees, some winning and some losing.
The Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) have despised the principles upon which the United States was founded – Individualism – outlined in the Declaration of Independence, The United States Constitution, and the Bill of Rights. They have called these documents outdated and have claimed they must be modernized (abolished) to coincide with the principles of Collectivism (Marxism, Communism, Socialism, Progressives) as outlined in the ‘Communist Manifesto.” They have claimed anything goes morally including murder so long as the word choice is used. The Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) now openly encourage and join those who would persecute and try to eliminate from society anything to do with the God of the Bible.
The Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) have openly encouraged and willing participate in the mainstay of any Collectivist takeover, MOBS NOT JOBS. tHEY now encouraged and willing participation in what they want to be the new normal; MOB RULE. The Marxist/Progressives (Democrats), namely Obama and Holder, gave birth to Black Lives Matter, mostly Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) members of the house have supported and encouraged the ANTIFA movement to prevent free speech, and Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) have called for incivility in everyday activities through harassment and intimidation of any who do not conform to the Collectivist (Marxist, Communist, Socialist, Progressive) movement or MOB RULE.
The Individualist or conservative movement was resilient in many areas of the nation; Florida, Georgia, Indiana, North Dakota, Missouri to name a few states. The voices of such as Sam Adams, Patrick Henry, Tom Paine, and Nathen Hale, are still loud and clear as they called for freedom, independence from a tyrannical government, private ownership of property, liberty, and equality because all are viewed as an individual and not a member of a group. Sadly, the overwhelming number of Americans who were students in any public school have no idea who the above patriots were, or more why they risked everything for a country founded on individualism.
The other reality of last night that is very clear as the sun rises; Paul Ryan proved that failure, deceit, and treason are and should be his legacy. Ryan was a failure as a Speaker. Ryan introduced and negotiated budgets with the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) that were as one sided as was the Iran deal Obama negotiated with the Islamist Jihadists he so admires. Ryan claimed he was a fiscal and social conservative, but all evidence shows that he was to the left of most if not all RHINO’s. Ryan was a traitor to his party when he refused to step aside as Speaker when he announced he was not seeking re-election. The result was that the house mid-terms floundered and went in circles much like a rudderless ship. Ryan, however satisfied his ego, and perhaps fulfilled his wish, of remaining as Speaker and handing the gavel to a Marxist/Progressive (Democrat). An Individualist can come to no other conclusion than that Paul Ryan was a complete failure. The argument could be made that Ryan accomplished everything he wanted to accomplish; bigger government, a bigger deficit, open borders, and a Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) house. Freedom and liberty however won because Ryan will soon be a private citizen.
THOUGHTS TO HAVE BEFORE YOU VOTE AND WHILE YOU ARE VOTING
The Results of open borders and “Hope and Change”
Last year, women took to the streets of one of the migrant-heavy areas of Paris to protest about what they say has become an all-male “no-go zone,” where any female daring to venture out alone is subject to severe sexist harassment or worse. They’ve stopped protesting and now fear leaving the house.
BODY COUNT LONDON 2018 CLIMBS TO 115 DEAD: Boy, 17, stabbed to death outside London subway station
“If French no-go zones revolt, we don’t have the capacity to face them,” said France ex-military chief
Germany: Muslims try to derail high-speed train with steel wire across railroad
France: Innumerable neighborhoods are Islamised and ruled by Sharia law
Obama To Americans: You Don’t Deserve To Be Free
Be aware while you are voting
The person who did not remember how to spell their name or what their address is, is a Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) voting for somebody illegally registered.
The person who asked for your parents’ ballot, your parents have been deceased for 10 and 5 years now, is a Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) who received your parents name from the person who paid them.
The person who walked out of the voting booth and is now back in line, is a Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) fulfilling the call by the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) to vote early and often.
The person who just asked for a ballot for “Pluto” is a Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) paid to vote throughout the state for the different Disney Characters that they registered.
The person who asked for a ballot whose address does not physically exist and 45 other people are registered at the same address, is an illegal alien who received payment from the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) to risk any chance they might have of becoming a US citizen to cast illegal votes. The illegal alien should learn that, just like Professor Ford, once they have used you, you will be cast aside for the good of the cause.
The person who is rechecking their votes to make sure their votes are registered as cast is a Freedom Loving American who understands that “Hope and Change” means Marxist style tyranny and the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) despise our Republic, our Declaration of Independence, our Constitution, and our Bill of Rights so much they will employee the most vile and illegal means imaginable to gain their ends of a Marxist totalitarian state.
DO NOT REMOVE
Don Jans, the author of "My Grandchildren's America", believes that America is great because of it's promises of individual freedom and opportunity. Like most grandparents, he believes his grandchildren will have the ability and desire to excel, if that opportunity is still available. Will the changes promised and happening now, limit these freedoms and opportunities?
Don has been a student of history for over 40 years. He has concentrated in the study of European history with an emphasis on Russian history. This led him to his study of Karl Marx and Marxism. In addition to being a popular speaker on Marxism, Don has also had articles published on the topic. He also has been a guest on regional and national media broadcasts.
Dec 1, 2014 Presentation with Don Jans http://www.thevillagesteaparty.org/dec-1-2014-with-don-jans.html
Dec 1, 2014 Special Interview with Don Jans
Contact info: firstname.lastname@example.org