Don Jans' - BOOKS AVAILABLE HERE
Receive 5% discount
No shipping or handling charges
At Checkout Add Coupon Code: AM
Review of "The Road To Tyranny" "Your definition of Individualism and Collectivism was clear and relevant. I had heard about the slippery slope before, I now understand what it is and that it is real. You made so clear how our freedom and liberty are under attack. The book was easy to read and to understand. I really appreciate that you did not resort to “bumper sticker” attacks but stayed with reason and facts. I have purchased more books to give to people who would never otherwise be aware of what is happening.
SPEAKER INFORMATION CONTACT AT: MYGRANDCHILDRENSAMERICA@GMAIL.COM
Don Jans is a nationally acclaimed SPEAKER and AUTHOR contrasting the policies proclaimed by Karl Marx with the principles upon which our NATION WAS FOUNDED:
GOVERNMENT SHOULD NEVER BE TRUSTED – IT IS ALWAYS THE BIGGEST THREAT TO FREEDOM
When our nation was founded, a government was formed with great hesitation by the founders. The founders understood that in forming a government they were creating the single biggest threat to the freedom they had just won. In order to protect those freedoms, freedoms they had just won from a tyrannical government, freedoms granted by our Creator and not man nor government, the founders wrote the Constitution. Patrick Henry stated, “The Constitution is an instrument not for the government to restrain the people, but for the people to restrain the government, less it (the government) should come to dominate our lives and our interests.”
The Constitution is not the governments. In fact, the Constitution places limits on the powers of the government. The Constitution states specifically what limited powers the federal government has and reinforces the fact that the federal government’s powers are indeed greatly restricted in the 10th Amendment. This is one reason those who advocate for bigger and a more controlling government also would have us believe that the Constitution is a “living document.” All a “living document” means is that the Constitution has no meaning and thus there are no restriction on the government which is in direct contrast with the whole purpose of the Constitution.
Ronald Reagan said, “The government is not the solution, the government is the problem.” Thomas Paine said, "It is the responsibility of the patriot to protect his country from its government." Sam Adams told us, "If ever time should come, when vain and aspiring men shall possess the highest seats in Government, our country will stand in need of its experienced patriots to prevent its ruin."
This is Comrade Obama’s view of government, “Unfortunately, you’ve grown up hearing voices that incessantly warn of government as nothing more than some separate, sinister entity that’s at the root of all our problems; some of these same voices also doing their best to gum up the works. They’ll warn that tyranny is always lurking just around the corner. You should reject these voices”
The age-old question is do we trust those individuals who are in government or do we constantly insist on constant review and total transparency. Our founders and other freedom loving Americans warned us about the danger of entrusting individuals with great power and control and not requiring constant review and transparency. Those who believe in the goodness and control of government insist that all in government can be and should be trusted.
We are now learning why our founders were correct and Comrades like Obama are wrong. The desire by those individuals in government to rule and control can never be underestimated or dismissed. We are learning of people like Holder, Mueller, Brennan, Clapper, Comey, and others who took it upon themselves to determine what is right for the American people. We are also now learning that this directive came from Comrade Obama.
These individuals determined it was their decision to determine what the American people can and should know, who should be elected president, that it was right for them to lie and mislead, that it was right for them to release government and classified information, and that they are above the law and therefore their actions and deeds should not be investigated and revealed.
Now Clapper, who has on several other occasions blatantly lied to the American people, is telling us it was for the good of the American people and the Trump campaign that the federal government spied on the Trump campaign. This is distorted logic that only a conspiring and narcissistic individual could conceive. The facts seem to point to Obama at the very least approving of these actions.
What is being revealed is that a conspiracy to thwart the rule of law and the Constitution itself was a part of the daily workings of the Obama regime. They apparently believed their scheme would go undiscovered when Hillary took office. Then election night happened. They continued to try to cover their anti-freedom activities with the appointment of Mueller. Now the truth is unraveling despite of Mueller’s activities.
Holder and the others have said a complete and transparent investigation would be harmful to and undermine the DOJ and the FBI and in fact the whole government. To allow the deeds of those who desired to undermine the very fabric of our Republic to remain secret would be far more dangerous. The United States is facing a Constitutional crisis. Our Republic has and is being threatened. These who have perpetrated this conspiracy are in the same category as was Benedict Arnold.
STACY ABRAMS VICTORY IN GEORGIA IS VERY REVEALING AND FRIGHTENING IF YOU LOVE FREEDOM
Stacy Abrams is being touted as a black female who won the race for the Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) primary for governor in Georgia. We hear the black female loud and clear but what we are not hearing is that Stacy Abrams eliminates the Democrat and totally embraces the Marxist/Progressive. Here are many of her stated policies:
Stacy Abrams advocates for public education of your children by the state from the cradle. The Marxist has always advocated that the values of the child is to be determined by the state and not the parent because the child is really the property of the state and not the responsibility of the parent.
Stacy Abrams says Georgia should have a fair economy by lifting the poor out of poverty which means wealth confiscation and redistribution as determined by the state along with central planning. She also says this includes state wide universal healthcare.
Stacy Abrams advocates for more government control over the lives of the citizens. She advocates making people more dependent on the government and less self-reliant claiming that some people are incapable and can only survive and even thrive with the help of the government. This is of course advocating collectivism over individualism, communism over the American ideal of pursuit of happiness and not guaranteed outcome for all.
Stacy Abrams advocates total and complete voter registration and no restrictions or requirements of proof of citizenship at time of registration or when voting. Like all the Marxist/Progressives in the United States, she understands that election results can be greatly enhanced by promising people the benefit of others hard work and effort and then allowing all legal or illegal voters to cast ballots, so they can receive based on need and not on effort or contribution.
Stacy Abrams echoes Karl Marx in his belief that “From each according to his ability to each according to his needs” as Stacy Abrams claims that merit based should be ignored and need based should be the rule.
Stacy Abrams advocates the Marxist philosophy as did Lenin, Stalin, Trotsky, Mao, Castro, Chavez and does Obama, Holder, Jarrett, and Axelrod. The frightening aspect of Abrams victory in the primary is that several other openly Marxist/Progressives won by wide margins in the Democrat primaries. The party of Truman and Kennedy has become the party of Marx, Lenin, Stalin, Trotsky, Mao, Castro Chavez, Obama, Holder, Jarrett, and Axelrod.
These Marxists, including Abrams, as all Marxists despise the principles upon which the United State was founded and prospered; those principles of individualism, rule of law, limited government, divided government and sovereignty by the people. As did Marx and Lenin, these current Marxists advocate collectivism, arbitrary law, big government, concentrated power, government control, and a “Dictatorship by the Proletariat” that will bring about the Marxist classless society that is totally conforming and totally equal socially, politically, and economically; a desired utopia that has ended in a total social and economic catastrophe every time it is attempted.
May 21, 2018
Coup de-etat against Trump
Chuck Morse and Don Jans, the author of My Grandchildren's America, discuss the latest political developments around the agenda to depose the administration of President Donald J. Trump.
COURT RULING SAYS THAT CONGRESS MUST DO ITS JOB
The legislative Branch of government is the only branch of government that, according to the United States Constitution, can make law. Law is not to be made by the Executive Branch or the Judicial Branch of government. However, congress has failed to do its job and the executive and judiciary were only to willing and to eager to pick up the slack. The politicians in congress greatly appreciate this because it allowed them to pontificate without taking a stand. We saw this when then Speaker of the House made the most telling statement of how Congress avoided its duty when she infamously stated, “We must pass this bill, so we can learn what is in it away from the fog of the controversy.” What Pelosi stated, although she probably had no idea she was saying given her restricted intellectual capacity, is that congress will allow both the executive branch through regulations, and the judiciary branch through rulings, to make the difficult decisions and allow the congress to avoid their responsibility.
The left has come to hate Trump even more than they did prior to the election because Trump has stated that congress must do its work, as in the case of DACA, in the education area, and environmental areas to name a few. The left is also deathly afraid of judicial nominees that Trump has chosen because these are judges who understand their role is not to make law but to enforce law. This latest case is a perfect example with the judge saying his personal belief is of no consequence, he can only give a ruling based on the law. If congress does not like the ruling, then they must change the law. The ball is in your kitchen congress; can you stand the heat.
This is the background:
In April 2014, Epic Systems Corporation sent an email to a group of its employees. The email contained a modified arbitration agreement. The agreement mandated that all wage-and-hour claims made by the email’s recipients could be brought against Epic only through individual arbitration. The agreement also required that the employee waive their right to any other means of resolving such a disagreement. The email said that continuing employment at Epic constituted agreement to the new conditions.
Not long afterward, one of the group filed a lawsuit alleging he and others had been deprived of overtime pay. Epic asked the court to dismiss the lawsuit as the plaintiff, Jacob Lewis, had agreed to waive legal action when he acknowledged receipt of the company’s email. The trial judge refused to dismiss the case and allowed it to proceed to trial. Epic appealed to the Seventh Circuit. The Seventh Circuit agreed with the trial judge. The Seventh held that the National Labor Relations Act held precedence over the Federal Arbitration Act, a law allowing employers to impose arbitration. Epic appealed to the Supreme Court.
Neil Gorsuch, Trump appointee to the Supreme Court, in a 5-4 decision, agreed with Epic (decision).
Gorsuch and the majority didn’t take a position on what policy was best but rather what the law required:
Gorsuch writes that the “policy may be debatable, but the law is clear: Congress has instructed that arbitration agreements like those before us must be enforced as written. While Congress is of course always free to amend this judgment, we see nothing suggesting it did so in the” National Labor Relations Act, “much less that it manifested a clear intention to displace the Arbitration Act.”
The larger point is that it isn’t the job of the Supreme Court to decide what is the best policy. That job belongs to Congress. This is very much in line with the immigration case decided last week which found Congress had passed a law that was impermissibly vague. And it shows a mature recognition that the courts do grave damage to their own credibility when they wade into policy battles to try to remedy a mess made by Congress.
The left is demonizing Gorsuch because he followed the mandate given to the courts in the United States Constitution. He ruled on the law as passed by Congress. The left says that because the courts have consistently ignored The Constitution and made rulings based on their personal beliefs, this is precedence and should be continued. The left is wrong again. The law is the law and only congress has the power to change it. Do your job congress. Enough grandstanding, pontificating, and shirking your duty. There is a new sheriff in town.
HOW THE DEMOCRACY DESIRED BY THE MARXIST/PROGRESSIVES (DEMOCRATS) WORKS
Venezuela – the country who has employed the very policies called for by the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) – collectivism, big government, confiscation of assets by the government supposedly to redistribute, government demands on how the people are to run their lives, restrictions on freedoms including speech and religion, and confiscation of guns, held an election on Sunday. Just like in all collectivist nations as desired by the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) the results were known on the Saturday before election Sunday – Maduro Wins in a Landslide. The predetermined number that was announced on Monday was Maduro 5.8 million votes and others 1.8 million votes. Most people said they did not vote but just like in California, New York, or Illinois the facts do not get in the way of the final tally.
The difference in Venezuela from the United States today is that the government can legally jail anybody who would challenge them. Although the Mueller team is adjusting to the Maduro ways. In the United States, we have learned, the law enforcement arms of the federal government still have to oppose the opposition in a covert manner. In Venezuela the government can and did close down the opposition overtly while in the United States Obama’s DOJ and FBI had to secretly tap the phone lines of Trump’s campaign, secretly infiltrate Trump’s campaign with spies, fund totally fabricated stories and then use them to try to give some rule of law excuse to spy and use that same fabricated story to have Brennan and Clapper lie about Russian collusion, somewhat covertly.
Votes will probably be destroyed if anyone has reasonable proof that vote tampering occurred. How does this differ from the campaign of Debbie Wasserman Schultz? Voters were being intimidated at the polls in Venezuela by government thugs. How does this differ from Black Panther thugs standing outside US voting stations with their military garb and Billy clubs? Irregularities in votes counted and citizens going to the polls will take place. How does this differ from Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) calling for illegal aliens being able to vote along with previously deceased voters and pets of voters, not to mention the number of Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) who believe if one vote is good than ten must be better.
Freedom Loving Americans take a good look at Venezuela. All the policies advocated for by the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) are the same policies called for by Chavez. We see the result in Venezuela and it will be the same result in the United States. The policies of the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) have always resulted in a nation that suffers from the worst of social and economic decay.
Will the Venezuela people recover? Eventually yes, however, they still have many hardships to suffer. Many more will be killed, die from starvation, be imprisoned, be robbed, and suffer the humiliation of not being able to provide for their families. All of this could have been avoided. They were promised “Hope and Change” and enough believed it was a better way so that Marxist Chavez was able to gain control and the downward spiral began. The United States is in that downward spiral thanks to the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats). The Marxist/Progressives including Obama’s DOJ and FBI failed in their attempts to rig the 2017 election. Unless the swamp is completely drained, our freedom remains at great risk.
A spectre is haunting THE UNITED STATES — the spectre of COMMUNISM.
Four Democratic candidates backed by the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) won primary elections for legislative seats in Pennsylvania on Tuesday. The Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) is the largest socialist organization in the United States. DSA's members are building progressive (Communist) movements for social change while establishing an openly democratic socialist presence in American communities and politics.
This is from the DSA’s statement: We are socialists because we reject an international economic order sustained by private profit, alienated labor, race and gender discrimination, environmental destruction, and brutality and violence in defense of the status quo.
We are socialists because we share a vision of a humane international social order based both on democratic planning and market mechanisms to achieve equitable distribution of resources, meaningful work, a healthy environment, sustainable growth, gender and racial equality, and non-oppressive relationships.
These are quotes from the Communist Manifesto: “Then the world will be for the common people, and the sounds of happiness will reach the deepest springs. Ah! Come! People of every land, how can you not be roused.”
And here it becomes evident that the bourgeoisie is unfit any longer to be the ruling class in society and to impose its conditions of existence upon society as an over-riding law. It is unfit to rule because it is incompetent to assure an existence to its slave within his slavery, because it cannot help letting him sink into such a state that it has to feed him instead of being fed by him. Society can no longer live under this bourgeoisie; in other words, its existence is no longer compatible with society.
The proletarians have nothing to loose but their chains. They have a world to win.
More from DSA: DSA carries on a fine old American tradition— the tradition carried on by Eugene Debs and thousands more. I am proud to be a member.
Debs originated the Socialist Party in the United States and identified with the Communist Party of the USA throughout his lifetime.
The DSA sings the same song sung by Karl Marx, Friedrich Engels, Lenin, Mao, Castro, Chavez, Frank Marshall Davis, Obama, Jarrett, and Axelrod.
The thread which runs through Lenin’s writings is his view that socialism should be a society where the working people control their own fate, a society organized to benefit the vast majority. This view was the foundation for Lenin’s efforts in socialist construction. The result was the Soviet Union.
Communism cannot exist without socialism. Socialism always morphs into communism.
Every attempt to bring about the fictional society espoused by Collectivism has ended with a society suffering from both social and financial decay. Poverty and crime escalate while the living standards for all but a few plummet. Tyranny is the inevitable end.
A spectre is haunting THE UNITED STATES — the spectre of COMMUNISM.
A FEW FACTS ABOUT KARL MARX AS THE LEFT TRIES TO GLORIFY HIM
Marx was born into a Jewish family who had a rich Jewish history with many of his uncles being Rabbis.
Marx’s mother came from a wealthy family.
Marx’s father practiced law; was successful and purchased a small vineyard.
Marx had few friends as a kid. He was a good student.
Marx was supported by his parents when he went of to Cologne and then Berlin to go to school. Marx spent beyond his allowance, but his father would always give him the extra that Marx requested. When Marx’s father died, his mother said no more and cut back drastically on the allowance Marx received.
Marx married Jenny von Westphalen who was four years older than Marx and broke her engagement to a Prussian officer in order to date Marx who married her several years later.
Marx was never a good provider and was never employed other than as a news editor for left wing newspapers that were quickly closed or failed. Marx did write for the New York Daily News and received small amounts for articles he submitted, many of which were written by Friedrich Engels.
Marx and his family lived in poverty. They had seven children, only three of whom survived to adulthood. Of the three, the oldest died as an adult from illness and the other two girls committed suicide. All three girls were loyal to Marx. The two girls who committed suicide received money from Engels and lived rather up scale lives in their last years.
Friedrich Engels, the only real friend Marx had, was a devoted follower of the Marx philosophy. Engels was a part of owner of a textile mill in Manchester England and was able to sustain the Marx family because of his earnings. When Engels retired and sold his part of the business, he gave Marx a substantial annuity.
It was Engels that actually wrote Das Kapital Volumes II and III from notes left behind by Marx after he died.
Marx said many things but lived his life by completely different standards. He advocated for the worker and condemned the bourgeoisie even though Marx and Jenny strived to live like the bourgeoisie. Marx did not like to be around workers and would verbally attack them when they were in his presence. Marx was caustic and would verbally and legally attack anybody who would question him in any way.
Marx said that all estates should be taxed at the rate of 100% because the assets belonged to the collective or the state. Yet at the death of Jenny’s mother and the death of Marx’s mother, not one cent of the benefits they received, which were substantial, were shared with anyone.
Marx understood that to bring about his classless society would require despotic actions and he supported such actions. He also stated that there would be a time that society would be ruled by the Dictatorship of the Proletariat with all dictatorship implies.
The picture the left tries to paint of Karl Marx the man is often a false picture. He was a very selfish person who placed the needs of himself above the needs of his family or anybody else. He allowed his family to live in abject poverty, at times being deeply in debt and begging for food. When Engels wrote to Marx to tell him that Engels long time live in girl friend had died, Marx replied with a quick “that is to bad” but I have not received the money you usually send, please send as soon as possible.
Marx is not an individual to admire unless you believe narcissistic individuals deserve admiration. His philosophy, where practiced, has brought about tremendous poverty and suffering and has resulted in the death of millions by starvation, by murder, and extreme living conditions while imprisoned or otherwise. Marx lived a life of double standards and lies. Those who would honor the Marxist or Communist philosophy and hold up Karl Marx as a great philosopher and humanitarian are in a pretend world.
ANOTHER ANTI-AMERICAN GOAL AIDED BY COMRADE AND MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD LOVER, OBAMA
U.S. Muslim preacher: “Soon, America will be ours”
Here in the United States: “The number of Muslims in the US has increased by 40% in just five years — between 2010-2015 — while in the same period the non-Muslim population of the US has grown by only five percent.”
“Radicalism: The Real Shock Was the Reaction of the Americans…,” by Majid Rafizadeh, Gatestone Institute, May 12, 2018:
“Soon,” said the letter, “America Will Be Ours”.
The writer, it became clear, was an extremist Muslim in the U.S. who claimed to be a reputable religious preacher. With each new word, concern grew.
He pointed out, throughout the letter, the “sinful” ways of the West: dancing, drinking, dating…
He expressed disgust that most women did not wear the hijab or participate in prayer five times a day. Then he got straight to the point: “Ours,” he explained, represented Muslims like him.
The sentiment is hardly a new one. A person hears similar proclamations from many Muslim extremists throughout the years. The real shock was not letter but the reaction of many Americans after seeing it.
Such a thing, they said, could never happen. The writer’s words were “just bluster,” nothing to be taken seriously. Most surprisingly, they stated — honestly — that Muslims who speak of such intentions do not really mean what they say, so these threats should not be cause for concern.
The history of the two nations where I grew up — Iran and Syria — taught all of us there a big lesson about living in this kind of ignorance: the reality of how quickly a nation can be consumed by the philosophies of a religious state. An authoritarian and malicious regime, as exists now in Iran — the world’s leading sponsor of terrorism and brutal even to its own people — is something we cannot forget.
In a few centuries, in Syria, where more than 90% percent of the population were Christians, and in Iran where an overwhelming majority of citizens were Zoroastrians, the demography drastically shifted to majority-Muslim. Neither nation could have anticipated such a change.
While many may underestimate the radical preacher’s claims that “Soon, America Will Be Ours”, for extremist Muslims these beliefs are strongly and deeply rooted.
Many extremists believe that their religious desire — for a “Muslim takeover of the White House, a directive from Muhammad himself” — is coming true in the US. Religiously speaking, for these Muslims, ruling America is Allah’s (God’s) word, a sacred promise is coming to fruition.
A recent survey and demographic research released by the Pew Research Center found that Muslims will soon overtake members of other religions, including Jews, as the second-largest religious group in the United States.
This issue should not be taken lightly. What does being the second-largest religion in a country mean? Voters impact local and national politics, swing domestic elections, elect more representatives from the same religious affiliation, are influential enough to determine who the next president of the United States may be, and change the laws of the land. All it takes is a subtle shift in power for the entire society, political system and culture of a nation to be changed.
The number of Muslims in the US has increased by 40% in just five years — between 2010-2015 — while in the same period the non-Muslim population of the US has grown by only five percent. This means that the Muslim population is growing almost eight times faster than the non-Muslim population in the US….(Read More...)
IS KIM JONG UN SEEING THE LIGHT
We have witnessed a remarkable turn in the cruel dictator of North Korea. Perhaps he sees the tremendous opportunity he has to become a truly beloved leader to his people. We can only hope this is the case.
We must recall that throughout the last 50 years or so, the United States has fallen at the feet of the North Korean leaders much like the United States accepted the so-called inevitable domination of Communism during the days of the Cold War. Ronald Reagan finally said no to the Communist dictators and rose from the negotiating table and left the room. He said we will not give in to the ridiculous demands of the Soviet Union. In a few years the Soviet Union and the Soviet bloc were no more, and the Cold War ended.
When Reagan walked from the negotiating table saying he could not accept the terms he was being offered, he was roundly criticized. The typical pundits and politicians denounced Reagan as a war monger, as unstable, and as being unable to understand the significance of his actions. Reagan understood what he was doing, and he was correct.
Clinton, the Bushes, and Obama caved to the North Koreans proclaiming that the only way to deal with them was to negotiate or give them what ever they demanded for false promises from them. Trump told Kim Jong Un that those days no longer existed because a typical politician and appeaser was not in the White House. Trump explicitly told Kim Jong Un that he had more and bigger bombs and if North Korea wanted to play war games, they would lose and Kim Jong Un would be no more. Kim Jong Un took advantage of the Olympic games being in South Korea and began to play nice.
What Kim Jong Un has done since is remarkable. Make no mistake, a cruel and murderous dictator can never be trusted and any actions he promises to take must be absolutely verified, unlike the requirements Comrade and Muslim Brotherhood appeaser Obama required of Iran.
The opportunity Kim Jong Un has could make him a beloved leader by choice and not by demand in North Korea. The nuclear weapons he was developing and probably has do not benefit his people nor do they really benefit him. If Kim Jong Un should choose to use them, he would be annihilated. He has also learned that he cannot use the them as a threat against Trump like they were used as a threat against the previous people who occupied the White House. Thus, the usefulness of the weapons or threat of development of such weapons has greatly diminished.
On the other hand, Kim Jong Un could use the verified demolition of both any weapons he has and the facilities to create such weapons to bring about an economic revival in North Korea by negotiating for investment in his country by nations of the free world. Imagine what North Korea could become if all sanctions were lifted and the nations of the free world would be welcomed to invest in North Korea. Kim Jong Un could be revered as the person who brought economic prosperity to his people and his country simply be getting rid of weapons and a development system that, because of Trump, has lost any use as a negotiating tool.
Let us hope that Kim Jong Un understands that his opportunity should not be wasted. Trump is not easily used or fooled. Trump also, as the world has learned, is a man of his word. Yes, Kim Jong Un, the United States press and the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) would denounce Trump for helping you understand the opportunity you have, but your people would be grateful to you forever...(Read More...)
WHAT YOU EARN AND WHAT YOU HAVE IS NOT YOURS!!!
Everything belongs to the collective or the state. Any assets you might have accumulated or received are not yours and you have no right to determine to whom they should go through gifting or at the time of your death. Anything you earn in any way is not yours regardless of your effort or sacrifice to earn it.
“FROM EACH ACCORDING TO HIS ABILITITES, TO EACH ACCORDING TO HIS NEEDS,” SO SAID KARL MARX AND SO SAY NANCY PELOSI AND THE MARXIST/PROGRESIVES (DEMOCRATS).
Marxist/Progressive leader Nancy Pelosi gleefully laughs about taxing Americans if Marxist/Progressives win mid-terms. When Americans were allowed to keep some of what they earned, Comrade Pelosi repeatedly said that the GOP’s tax cuts amounted to “crumbs” for the middle class. Yet, Pelosi resented the middle class from retaining even “crumbs.”
And now, appearing at a Politico event, Comrade Pelosi was asked to respond to GOP talking points that a Speaker Pelosi would institute single-payer health care and “raise taxes” by moving to “roll back the tax cuts that they passed this year.” Pelosi’s response: “The second part there is accurate.” So, there is Pelosi, confirming she would to raise taxes if Marxist/Progressives win back the majority this fall.
Remember, it was Comrade Franklin Roosevelt that said 100% or what you earn over a certain amount should be confiscated by the collective or the state. Pelosi and the current Marxist/Progressives are headed to fulfilling that declaration by Roosevelt. Roosevelt also stated that this was fair. Marx agreed as do all Communists. They strongly believe that all belongs to the collective or the state and it is the collective or the states divine responsibility to redistribute based on what they define as the need of each of their subjects, serfs, or slaves.
Our founders warned us about this danger when they said that freedom would cease to exist if you take from those who would work and give to those who would not. The founders have been proven that what they said is accurate. Look at Venezuela to learn just how correct they were...(Read More...)
OBAMA REGIME LIED TO CONGRESS AND AMERICAN PEOPLE TO PASS IRAN DEAL
The Obama regime promised the American people that there would be unfettered inspection rights in Iran if his flawed Iranian Deal was passed. Of course, this was a lie stated not only by Obama but also Kerry and Rhodes. What we came to realize is that the real purpose of the Iran deal was so that Obama could pull all sanctions on Iran, sanctions that were working, and give Iran more cash so they could perpetuate terror around the world and especially harass Israel.
"Inspectors will also be able to access any suspicious location. Put simply, the organization responsible for the inspections, the IAEA, will have access where necessary, when necessary," Obama said.
Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei told military commanders that he would not allow any inspections of the country's military sites.
So, what does the deal actually say on the subject?
The agreement allows for a "long-term IAEA presence in Iran" to monitor materials and nuclear development that wouldn't be used in weapons. Inspectors will have continuous monitoring capabilities at known nuclear facilities. For other areas in the country, including military sites where there is suspected nuclear activity, IAEA inspectors will have to request access.
If inspectors have concerns that Iran is developing its nuclear capabilities at any of the non-official nuclear sites, they are allowed to request access "for the sole reason to verify the absence of undeclared nuclear materials and activities or activities inconsistent with" the agreement. They must also inform Iran of the basis for their concerns.
Iran, in response, can propose alternatives to inspection that might satisfy the IAEA's concerns, the deal says. But if they can't come to an agreement to satisfy the inspectors within 14 days of the original request for access, the issue goes to a joint commission that consists of representatives from the P5+1 powers (the U.S., China, Russia, France, the United Kingdom and Germany), Iran, and the European High Representative for Foreign Affairs. They have another seven days to reach an agreement that must be supported at least five of the eight members. If they decide inspectors should get access, Iran has three days to provide it.
That means a total of 24 days could elapse between the...(Read More...)
WHAT THE MARXIST/PROGRESSIVES (DEMOCRATS) WANT FOR THE UNITED STATES
The other evening, prior to speaking to another group hungry for the truth, a gentleman who had within the last several months escaped the confines of Venezuela came and introduced himself to me. In the course of our conversation he told me that not only were citizens of Venezuela fleeing the ravages of the political and economical system the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) desire for the United States, but members of the military were also fleeing. The reasons the military personnel were fleeing were the same reasons citizens were fleeing; no food, no clothes, no ordinary necessary daily supplies, crime, and all the other conditions that always result from this social and economic system touted by the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) here in the United States.
I did some research on what the gentleman told me about the military in Venezuela, and here is what I found.
CARACAS, VENEZUELA (BLOOMBERG) - Military officers are joining the exodus of Venezuelans to Colombia and Brazil, fleeing barracks and forcing President Nicolas Maduro's government to call upon retirees and militia to fill the void.
High desertion rates at bases in Caracas and the countryside are complicating security plans for the presidential election in 13 days, which by law require military custody of electoral materials and machinery at voting centres.
"The number is unknown because it used to be published in the Official Gazette. Now, it is not," said Ms Rocio San Miguel, director of Control Ciudadano, a military watchdog group in Caracas.
She said soldiers are fleeing for the same reason citizens are: "Wages are low, the quality of food and clothing isn't good."
Last week, officers who rank as high as general were called in and quartered for several days at their units.
Retired officials and militia members were also contacted by their superiors, according to one retired officer who asked not to be named for fear of angering the regime.
Government officials are training these fill-in personnel for the election, said a second retired officer.
The shortage of troops comes as hundreds of thousands of Venezuelans flee a societal collapse...(Read More...)
WHEN COMMON SENSE AND JUDGEMENT ARE ELIMINATE
The secularists of the Western World, including those in the United States, are telling us that Marx was correct, and morality does not exist. These same people would have us believe that the teachings of a perverted and sick ideology, that being the ideology of Islam, should be not only tolerated and accepted, despite the abuse of women and children it encourages, but embraced and promoted. These people would have us believe that mercy killings, wife beating, rape, murder, female genital mutilation, and sex with young girls is normal behavior. Then these same secularists would have us believe this is advancing civilization just as is the murder of millions of children before they are even born.
If there is one thing history has taught us, it is that the secularist or the progressive movement is now and always has been a movement that restricts the basic principles upon which the United States was founded, the very basic principles of Individualism which declare that the rights of the individual supersede those of the collective so long as they do not infringe on the rights of others. In other words, the rights of women to live a...(Read More...)
REAL REASON FOR ATTACK ON 2ND AMENDMENT BY MARXIST/PROGRESSIVES
Any movement that had as its goal to control a population for the purpose of remaking that society into a totally different society has confiscated the weapons or guns of the people. The new society desired by the those who are championing change has historically been to change a free society who protects freedom of speech and thought, into a society adhering to only one political thought and eliminating the discourse of any dissenters. This is defined as a tyrannical society under a dictatorial or controlling government.
This is the mindset of the Marxist/Progressive Party (Democrats) in the United States. It is the goal of this group to fundamentally transform the free society of the United States into a totally conforming and totally equal, politically, socially, and economically, society. This has been stated and exhibited in many different ways including the call for the forced confiscation of all weapons of the citizens. Others who have employed this same tactic includes the Nazi party headed by Adolph Hitler. It is ironic that those championing the tactics of Hitler continue to call any who oppose them as Hitler like... (Read More...)
Yes, multicultural leftists actually believe their own nonsense. One might have thought that they were just trying to fool the public but were hell-bent on bringing in Muslim migrants so that they could benefit from the migrant influx financially or in some other way. But no, these dreamy fantasists actually think that the Muslim migrants are noble, gentle refugees who wouldn’t hurt a fly, and who are opposed only by racist “islamophobias.” This woman found out the truth, but it’s likely that even her horrific experience hasn’t changed her mind.
They just never learn a snake is a snake and will do what snakes do. A middle-aged Swedish woman was raped and abused by two Muslim asylum seekers in their asylum accommodation. The woman, who was a member of a Facebook group against migrant deportations, tried to prove that xenophobes are wrong about the fact that Muslims are dangerous.
On her way to work one morning
Down the path alongside the lake
A tender-hearted woman saw a poor half-frozen snake
His pretty colored skin had been all frosted with the dew
“Oh well,” she cried, “I'll take you in and I'll take care of you”
“Take me in oh tender woman
Take me in, for heaven's sake
Take me in oh tender woman,” sighed the snake
She wrapped him up all cozy in a curvature of silk
And then laid him by the fireside with some honey and some milk
Now she hurried home from work that night as soon as she arrived
She found that pretty snake she'd taken in had been revived
“Take me in, oh tender woman
Take me in, for heaven's sake
Take me in oh tender woman,” sighed the snake
Now she clutched him to her bosom, “You're so beautiful,” she cried
“But if I hadn't brought you in by now you might have died”
Now she stroked his pretty skin and then she kissed and held him tight
But instead of saying thanks, that snake gave her a vicious bite
“Take me in, oh tender woman
Take me in, for heaven's sake
Take me in oh tender woman,” sighed the snake
“I saved you,” cried that woman
“And you've bit me even, why?
You know your bite is poisonous and now I'm going to die”
“Oh, shut up, silly woman,” said the reptile with a grin
“You knew damn well I was a snake before you took me in
Take me in, oh tender woman
Take me in, for heaven's sake
Take me in oh tender woman, “sighed the snake.
CONGRESS CONCENTRATES ON IMPORTANT ISSUES WHILE IGNORING A $21 TRILLION DEBT
The national debt has been classified as the biggest threat to our national security, yes even bigger than global warming, cooling, or change. Each of us can determine whether it is warming, cooling, or change just as we each can determine if we or man, women, or something in between according to the Marxist/Progressives. Remember in the Marxist world of make believe, nothing is defined because everything depends upon how we “feel.” Also, in the Marxist world and the swampland world of Washington D.C. real problems are those they determine will give them publicity and votes the next time they run for office; in other words, if I have to take a stand on anything remotely controversial, then we should not have a vote in congress. If the bill is meaningless and makes me look like I am doing the business of the people, we must have a vote.
Congress refuses to hold budget hearings in committee and then vote on a budget bill. Congress refuses to do its constitutional mandated duty of setting immigration law and instead have the executive and the judiciary branch handle immigration law even though they have no constitutional authority in the matter of naturalization and immigration. Congress refuses to hold open and transparent committee hearings on budget matters and other matters and instead passes omnibus bills with self-imposed and meaningless deadlines.
But congress does the people’s business or, so they claim. A new bill floating through Congress may change the way musicians are paid. The House passed the Music Modernization Act with overwhelming support on Wednesday. It updates copyright and licensing laws for the first time in nearly two decades. The bill was introduced by House Judiciary Committee members Bob Goodlatte and Jerrold Nadler and simplifies royalties and mechanical payments to artists in the digital age. Supporters of the bill say it stands to benefit industry professionals by setting a statutory right to recognition for contributors like producers, sound engineers, and others.
The Senate will consider the bill on Tuesday, May 15 and it is expected to pass.
You can rest this week-end knowing the congress is doing the business of the people. Please Freedom Loving Americans, let’s drain the swamp of these pompous and freedom sucking frauds we call congressmen and senators.
DO NOT REMOVE
Don Jans, the author of "My Grandchildren's America", believes that America is great because of it's promises of individual freedom and opportunity. Like most grandparents, he believes his grandchildren will have the ability and desire to excel, if that opportunity is still available. Will the changes promised and happening now, limit these freedoms and opportunities?
Don has been a student of history for over 40 years. He has concentrated in the study of European history with an emphasis on Russian history. This led him to his study of Karl Marx and Marxism. In addition to being a popular speaker on Marxism, Don has also had articles published on the topic. He also has been a guest on regional and national media broadcasts.
Dec 1, 2014 Presentation with Don Jans http://www.thevillagesteaparty.org/dec-1-2014-with-don-jans.html
Dec 1, 2014 Special Interview with Don Jans
Contact info: firstname.lastname@example.org