MORE EXCUSES FOR CRIMINAL BEHAVIOR, BAD BEHAVIOR, AND IMMORAL BEHAVIOR
Sexual assault is the rage of the day. Back in the 1990’s sexual assault and rape were excused by the Marxist/Progressives as “boys will be boys” because the assaulter and rapist was their hero Bill Clinton. Hillary, the self-proclaimed champion of women blamed those who were assaulted and raped by Bill as being a part of some “vast right-wing conspiracy.” The net result was that criminal activity, (rape), bad behavior, and immoral behavior, were accepted by the Marxist/Progressives as just a part of life.
Rumors of this type of criminal, bad, and immoral behavior have been rampant for years. For many reasons, mostly money and power, the victims have been portrayed as the guilty participant. Those who have had the courage to speak the truth about these powerful “bad boys” have seen the abuse and criticism they will receive at the hands of other powerful women like Hillary Clinton who viewed them as a threat to their ambitions.
Throughout the world this type of behavior is being encouraged by the Marxist and Globalist movements, who have proclaimed themselves as the champions of women, by legitimizing the Muslim beliefs and teachings in Western society. Throughout the Western world, schools are promoting Islam beliefs while courts are protecting the criminal behavior (rape, beatings, and female genital mutilation). What these actions are doing are promoting the advancement of female degradation and abuse. Yet, the Marxists and Globalist, once again attack those who would support the rights of women as Islamophobic. Truly foolish people like Ashley Judd even believe she would have more rights as a female if she were living in a Muslim society as opposed to the United States. If her friends, the Marxists and Globalists are successful in their endeavors, Ashley Judd will not have to move to the Middle East, she can move to Western Europe or even stay in the United States to have her wish.
The Marxist/Progressives and Republican establishment once again revert to...(Read More...)
MORE COLLABORATION BETWEEN MARXIST/PROGRESSIVES (DEMOCRATS) AND REPUBLICAN ESTABLISHMENT DUPES TO TAKE AWAY OUR INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS
We have discussed the many similarities between the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) and Republican Establishment many times. There is little to no difference between these two political movements. Pushing aside those things that are best for the American people and protect our freedom and liberty, members of these two groups willingly join hands to do what’s best for their own selfish political interests instead.
While it’s easy as a Freedom Loving American to point at the socio-fascism of the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) as the primary cause of our ever-accelerating descent toward becoming a post-Constitutional America, it’s been the failure of the Republican Establishment to stand in the gap on behalf of the American people and the Constitution that is sealing our fate.
I have written about how the education of our children has been hijacked by the Marxist movement and our public schools are now indoctrination centers. Children—from preschool and kindergarten all the way through college—are being indoctrinated to surrender their Constitutional rights for the betterment of the collective.
In another example of the Republican establishments betrayal, Paul Ryan has hooked up with Patty Murray —they’ve worked together before—to create one of ..(Read More...)
THE LEFT HATES THE TRUTH
The Marxist enablers throughout the world have never wanted the truth told. We saw this during the 1920’s, 1930’s, and 1940’s, in the United States when the members of the Communist Party of the United States and their dupes refused to acknowledge the truth about what was happening in the Soviet Union or they refused to believe the truth about Communism. Frank Marshall Davis, Barack Obama’s mentor, often spoke of what a wonderful integrated community existed in the Soviet Union. Wonderful integration did not even exist for members of the Communist Party much less for the general population. Obama believes this evil is so wonderful he promised to fundamentally transform the United States to a Communist state.
Now these same Communist sympathizers are criticizing Trump for being direct and honest about the conditions in the Communist State of North Korea. I listened to the complete speech given by Trump the other night. I thought it was one of the best he has given. While he was discussing the horrible conditions in North Korea he repeated what people who have escaped that Communist State have said. He did not speculate and did not have to amplify. The actual conditions and treatment of the people by the Communists is far worse than the mind of an individualist could imagine. We individualists forget that collectivists, including communists, have absolutely no regard for human life, other than their own.
Here is what the Communist sympathizers of MSNBC said about Trump's speech.
MSNBC had a hard time grappling with...(Read More...)
THE IMPACT OF CULTURAL MARXISM IS SEEN ALL AROUND US
The deadly Islamic terrorist truck attack in New York City on Halloween exposed many issues, from national security to immigration policy. But it’s about much more than that. The attack and its aftermath have shone a light on the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) campaign to fundamentally transform America through cultural Marxism. That’s the revolutionary philosophy that aims to cure inequality and bring about conformity by destroying traditional Western culture. This includes massive, unrestricted immigration.
Sayfullo Saipov, a 29-year-old Uzbekistan native living in New Jersey, yelled “Allahu Akbar” while mowing down 20 people, killing at least eight on a bike path in lower Manhattan. He came to the U.S. in 2010 via the “diversity lottery” system created as part of the Immigration Act of 1990. Officials say he was “radicalized” by ISIS after moving to the U.S.
As Trump noted, Charles Schumer, New York Marxist/Progressive (Democrat), was a prime backer of the diversity program, in which 50,000 foreigners are admitted annually in a lottery. It doesn’t matter whether they love America or hate it. There was little to no vetting.
Before the bill’s passage, Schumer explained that America owes all of the countries of the world a certain amount of guaranteed entry into the United States, an extremely odd quota system that only a fool could advance with a straight face. There is no “right” in the Constitution to immigrate to the United States, and no other nation has embraced this wacky idea.
Why do Marxist/Progressives promote diversity over unity, multiculturalism over American heritage, sexual anarchy over marriage, and applaud when people speak languages other than English? The answer is that it ripens the field for...(Read More...)
TAX CUTS SHOULD BE BROAD AND DEEP AND SPENDING CUTS SHOULD BE BROAD AND DEEP
The early details of the tax reform plan were revealed, and it appears Washington is at last attempting to take action in reforming our heavily destructive tax code. The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act goes some way in lowering individual income tax rates for low- and middle-income Americans, while almost doubling the standard deduction for single and married tax filers. The bill is clearly targeted at the average American.
The bill also takes small steps toward simplifying the tax code by reducing the number of tax brackets and eliminating special interest deductions. As a point of much controversy and debate within the ranks of the GOP, the bill compromises on eliminating the state and local tax deduction but instead caps the deduction at $10,000.
The Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT) and the Death Tax will be both be repealed, the latter by 2024.
The cry from the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) and some of their Republican establishment dupes is that the tax cuts must be revenue neutral. What a ridiculous comment. The other ridiculous comment is that the tax cuts cannot benefit the rich but must benefit the poor. These are comments we would expect to hear from Marx and Engels. They did not make any sense either.
How do you have a cut that is neutral? ...(Read More...)
FREEDOM LOVING AMERICANS LETS HAVE A HEART TO HEART TALK
Another of Obama’s brothers killed 8 people in New York City in the name of what Obama calls “a peaceful religion.” These attacks and killings have taken place before in the United States and around the world including Western Europe. A left-wing reporter said the biggest danger in this incident is the backlash of the right against this “peaceful religion” or what is now known as Islamophobia.
A Republican establishment senator said that the structure of the tax cuts and tax reform must be done very carefully because the left will attack a tax bill as a right-wing plan to aid the rich and punish the middle class and the poor.
The American public is warned that the harsh policies of the Trump administration against Venezuela have the potential of toppling Maduro and that could be bad for the people of Venezuela because it could throw their country into further chaos and people might die from starvation.
Republican establishment senators rally against the Trump administration when they stop the illegal payments to insurance companies to fund the supposed loses the insurance companies are suffering due to the foolish mandates of Obamacare.
Republican establishment senators say that no spending or investigative limits can be placed on the investigation into so called Russian interference into our elections except the Uranium One deal, the DNC hard drive scandal, the killing of DNC employee Seth Rich, or Imran Awan.
Who is to blame for these destructive but politically correct positions? When we read right wing blogs or listen to right wing newscasters and ... (Read More...)
ADMITTED POLITICAL USE OF THE IRS BY THE MARXIST/PROGRESSIVES (DEMOCRATS) AND DOJ AND COUNTRY SAY SO WHAT
The Internal Revenue Service was used by the Marxist/Progressive Party (Democrats) to attack its political foes is now a fact since the IRS openly admitted such.
The IRS will fork over 3.5 million dollars and an apology after admitting it unfairly scrutinized Tea Party groups during the Obama Administration. Attorney General Jeff Sessions announced Thursday, that members of over 400 conservative groups reached a settlement. The groups claimed their tax-exempt status faced higher scrutiny in 2013 because of their political ideology. Sessions confirmed groups with the words ‘tea party’ or ‘patriots’ were subject to inappropriate screening in their applications. A senior attorney for judicial watch who helped uncover the scandal says it goes even deeper. After the settlement announcement, Sessions said the heightened scrutiny was wrong, adding it is improper for the IRS to single out groups for different treatment based on their names or ideological positions.
How pathetic. Once again, the real issue is ignored. A political party used a powerful agency of the federal government to put politics above the United States Constitution in a blatant attempt to deprive political foes their constitutionally protected right to free speech. For the sake of expediency, the Department of Justice claims a victory by having tax payer dollars paid to those who were harmed. Not one individual was indicted for an egregious attack on our constitution.
The freedom to oppose those in power is the most critical element of maintaining a free society. The elimination of such rights is always the first tactic to be... (Read More...)
THE ABSOLUTE STUPIDITY OF POLITICAL CORRECTNESS
We are now told that George Washington is controversial. Perhaps the NFL will begin to protest the Washington monument as racist. For sure General Robert E Lee was a terrible person, even though history portrays Lee as a great general and a true gentleman. Any student of history understands that an important element to the infamous communist slogan “hope and change,” used by Obama and Axelrod and taught to them, directly to Obama and indirectly to Axelrod by known Communist Party of the United States Of America member and direct mentor to Obama, Frank Marshall Davis; it is a critical part of the revolution to demonize the historical American heroes. Lenin, and then Stalin, taught this to Davis and other members of the CPUSA as a part of the Comintern’s indoctrination program for all party members. Obama, Axelrod, and Jarrett, another indirect student of Davis, have promulgated this teaching through their comrades and their dupes.
This was in the Washington Times and shows just how deeply this political correctness stupidity has penetrated our society.
George Washington was one of the founding members of Christ Church in Alexandria, Virginia, buying pew No. 5 when the church opened in 1773 and attending for more than two decades whenever he rode north from Mount Vernon to do business in town.
This weekend, the church announced it was pulling down a memorial plaque to its onetime vestryman and the country’s first president, saying he and another famous parishioner, Robert E. Lee, have become so controversial that they are chasing away would-be parishioners.
While acknowledging “friction” over the decision, the church’s leadership said both plaques, which are attached to the front wall on either side of the altar, are relics of another era and have no business in a church that proclaims its motto as “All are welcome — no exceptions.”
“The plaques in our sanctuary make some in our presence feel unsafe or unwelcome. Some visitors and guests who worship with us choose not to return because they receive an unintended message from the prominent presence of the plaques,” the church leaders said in a letter to the congregation that went out last week.
The decision was also announced to parishioners on Sunday.
The backlash was swift, with the church’s Facebook page turning into a battleground. Some supporters praised the church for a “courageous” stand, while critics compared leaders at the Episcopal church leaders to the Taliban or the Islamic State.
Church leaders said they debated for a long time, and the Rev. Noelle York-Simmons, the rector, said in an email to The Washington Times that the vote by the vestry was unanimous. The plaques will come down by next summer, when leadership determines another place for them.
For now, the Lee memorial, about the size of a grave marker, stands to the right of the altar, reading in gold lettering, “In Memory of Robert Edward Lee.” The Washington plaque to the left says: “In memory of George Washington.”
They were erected in 1870, just months after Lee’s death, and were a bit of a sensation at the time, earning mentions in newspapers from Massachusetts to San Francisco. The accounts said the memorials were paid for by subscription of citizens of Alexandria.
The church also has small metal markers on the Washington family pew and at the location where Lee was confirmed, but there is no other information or comment posted on the two men’s lives in the church.
Lack of other details was part of the problem for leaders, who said the memorials didn’t explain the two famous parishioners’ memorial presence.
“Because the sanctuary is a worship space, not a museum, there is no appropriate way to inform visitors about the history of the plaques or to provide additional context except for the in-person tours provided by our docents,” the church leaders said.
It’s not clear that the church could divorce itself from Washington even if it wanted to. The website touts itself as “a church where George Washington worshipped” and displays a picture of its famous patron.
As an original benefactor, Washington bought pew No. 5 when the church opened in 1773. He was a vestryman and contributed to the church throughout his life, according to the Washington Papers project. His family considered the church important enough to him that it donated one of his Bibles after his death.
Lee attended Christ Church beginning at age 3, when he moved from Stratford to Alexandria. The church was so integral to his family that Mary Custis Lee, his daughter, left the church $10,000 in her will upon her death in 1918. That money was used to begin the church’s endowment.
Church leaders did not say whether they will attempt to return the $10,000 gift from Lee’s daughter.
The church’s senior and junior wardens didn’t answer questions about the decision, and neither did Ms. York-Simmons, the rector.
Instead, she emailed a brief statement saying the decision was by “unanimous vote” of the vestry.
MARXISTS/PROGRESSIVES (DEMOCRATS) FIGHT ANY TAX CUTS
Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) believe the tax rate should be 100%. Franklin Roosevelt proposed a top rate of 100%. Marx said it was not the top rate that should be 100/% but that all should go to the government to redistribute based on need; as the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) define need. Sanders, Schumer, Obama, and other Marxist/Progressives will not voice that view, but everything they say and do follows that line.
The Senate minority leader, Schumer says Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) will take a hard-line approach with the White House on taxes.
“There is a path forward, but only after this tax bill fails,” Schumer says. “The hard right, which cares so much about just reducing taxes, has a stranglehold on the Republican Party right now. And I don’t think they’ll give it up unless this bill fails.”
This is exactly what Karl Marx would have said. No tax cut is fair. Any tax increase is right. Everything rightfully belongs to the state and it is up to the state to determine the best way to redistribute. Everything must be redistributed to accomplish the Marxist ideal for the United States, and all the world, eventually being a totally socially just, totally conforming, and totally equal society.
When Schumer or Sanders are confronted with the anemic growth rate their 100% confiscation plan produces, even though they will not verbally voice their honest opinion, they do understand the limitation on growth. That is what they want. Marx, Sanders, Schumer, and all Marxist/Progressives understand their economic program does not generate robust growth.
Marx said any economic growth...(Read More...)
AN EXPLANATION FOR THE ANTI MUSLIM INFILTRATION MOVEMENT IN EUROPE
Collectivists have always denied facts. They have denied economic facts. There policies have never worked. They have denied social facts. Their policies always lead to chaos. There has been much speculation as to why collectivists lie and deceive when trying to convince the public that their policies should be adopted, but the overwhelming reason seems to be their desire for control of others and wealth and prestige for themselves. We have seen this as well in the United States with Marxist Barack Obama. He lied to the American people when he pushed Obamacare into law. It failed much quicker than anybody thought it would. Obama lied to the American people when he said he would put the interests of the American people first. He then proceeded to give away our sovereignty in the Iranian Agreement, TPP, the Paris Climate Accord, and his foreign policy in general. Obama lied to the American people when he claimed he could allow massive immigration from Syria and other Muslim countries and still keep us safe. He could not and did not. His real purpose was to have the United States infiltrated with his brothers, Islamic Jihadists.
Americans had better take a hard look at Europe, primarily Britain...(Read More...)
FEINSTEIN IS TO CONSERVATIVE FOR CALIFORNIA PROGRESSIVES
Diane Feinstein, after she announced she would be running for her 4th term to the United States Senate, was declared to be out of touch with the California mainstream. Yes, it was said that Feinstein is not progressive enough and no longer represents the Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) Party of California, and the new Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) Party of the United States per the proclaimed policies of their collectivist leaders such as Bernie Sanders, Tom Perez, and Keith Ellison.
Earlier members of the Communist Party of the United States of America, such as Frank Marshall Davis who mentored Barack Obama, always referred to themselves as progressives as they were told by the Comintern to do. It makes no difference what they called themselves because the followed the Communist Party line as it was dictated at that time by Joseph Stalin.
This has been discussed in previous writings but is worth saying again. Collectivism is the opposite of Individualism. Individualism is the idea that the individual’s life belongs to him and that he has an inalienable right to live it as he sees fit, to act on his own judgment, to keep and use the product of his effort, and to pursue the values of his choosing. It’s the idea that the individual is sovereign, an end in himself, and the fundamental unit of moral concern. This is the ideal that the American Founders set forth and sought to establish when they drafted the Declaration and the Constitution and created a country in which the individual’s rights to life, liberty, property, and the pursuit of happiness were to be recognized and protected.
Collectivism is the idea that the individual’s life belongs not to him but to the group or society of which he is merely a part, that he has no rights, and that he must sacrifice his values and goals for the group’s “greater good.” According to collectivism, the group or society is the basic unit of moral concern, and the individual is of value only insofar as he serves the group. As one advocate of this idea puts it: “Man has no rights except those which society permits him to enjoy. From the day of his birth until the day of his death society allows him to enjoy certain so-called rights and deprives him of others; not . . . because society desires especially to favor or oppress the individual, but because its own preservation, welfare, and happiness are the prime considerations.”
Communism and socialism are the advanced forms of collectivism...(Read More...)
WAS ISIS REALLY BEHIND THE ATTACK IN LAS VEGAS
ISIS jihadi site claims Amaq, the official ISIS news agency, has video of Paddock, Vegas
Why a False Claim Seems at Odds With the Group’s Strategy By Michael S. Smith II
Since declaring its so-called caliphate in the summer of 2014, the Islamic State (also known as ISIS) has claimed responsibility for more than a dozen attacks in the West. Seven of them have occurred in the United States—most recently in Las Vegas. Stephen Paddock, a 64-year-old American whose religious interests remain a mystery, converted a luxury hotel room into a sniper’s perch and took aim at concert-goers gathered beneath his window, killing nearly 60 people and wounding hundreds more. Shortly after, via its Amaq “news service,” ISIS asserted that Paddock was a “soldier of the Islamic State who carried out the attack in response to calls for targeting coalition countries.” In a separate Amaq report, ISIS explained, Paddock “converted to Islam months before the attack.” Soon after, the group issued an official statement, in which it claimed that the shooting was in response to ISIS leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi’s call for attacks “targeting the crusader alliance” and that “after careful monitoring of the Crusader gatherings in the city of Las Vegas,” Paddock, whom ISIS identified using the kunya (or honorific title) “Abu Abd El Bar,” killed and wounded 600 people before becoming a “martyr.”
Newsweek: ISIS may be withholding proof that Las Vegas shooting was jihad in order to discredit FBI
October 10, 20172:17 pm By Robert Spencer:
“If Islamic State did indeed cultivate Paddock, as it has claimed was the case, the group surely has some evidence of its engagements with him. If it does, it may be the case the group is waiting on FBI and other agencies to dismiss its claim of responsibility for the Las Vegas attack before posting contradictory evidence online for the world to see. Islamic State has been very focused on undermining confidence among civilians in the West that their technologically-superior governments are competent managers of our collective security.”
If ISIS Was Behind Las Vegas Shooting, There’s a Terrifying Reason It Won’t Prove It Yet
By Tom O’Connor, Newsweek:
Authorities continue to doubt that the Islamic State militant group (ISIS) was behind last week’s massacre in Las Vegas, despite the jihadists’ persistent claims the shooter acted on their behalf. According to one leading expert’s analysis, however,...(Read More...)
OBAMA’S WAY OF AIDING HIS BROTHERS, THE ISLAMIST JIHADISTS, BACKFIRES WITH LITTLE MEDIA COVERAGE
It was the stated goal of Barack Obama to close Guantanamo Bay. Many of the worst and most devoted Islamic Jihadists were being held in Gitmo. A friend of the Jihadists, Barack Obama, believed it was best if those Jihadists who had stated publicly their hatred for the Unites States, were freed from the prison so they could continue their assault on the country Obama swore to protect. That was Obama’s grandest lie.
There were 242 Jihadist prisoners in Guantanamo Bay when Obama made his first great lie to protect the United States Constitution in January of 2009. In January of 2017 there were 41 remaining. Obama broke the law several times, while releasing his Jihadist brothers so they could continue their assault on Western civilization, by not giving proper notice to congress. Obama not only broke the law he promised to uphold, but he committed treason by aiding an enemy who had declared war on the United States.
In 2014 Obama traded five of the worst Jihadists for Army Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl, a suspected deserter at the time. The five Jihadists released were:
Khirullah Said Wali Khairkhwa: He was once the Taliban's interior minister, actually helping to create the Taliban movement in 1994. His Guantanamo case file described him as a “hard-liner in his support of the Taliban philosophy” and “known to have close ties to Osama bin Laden.”
Mullah Mohammad Fazl: Fazi was a senior commander in the Taliban army during the 1990s, eventually becoming its chief of staff. He is thought to have personally supervised the killing of thousands of Shiite Muslims near Kabul between 1998 and 2001. His Guantanamo case file also describes him as being present at a 2001 prison riot that led to the death of CIA operative Johnny Michael Spann, the first U.S. citizen killed in the Afghan war. "If released, detainee would likely rejoin the Taliban and establish ties with ACM elements participating in hostilities against US and Coalition forces in Afghanistan," his case file reads.
Mullah Norullah Noori: Noori was a provincial governor in several areas during the Taliban regime. He is also believed to have been present during Spann's death and may have also been involved in the Shiite massacre. His Guantanamo case file says that he "continues to be a significant figure encouraging acts of aggression."
Abdul Haq Wasiq: Wasiq was the deputy chief of intelligence for the Taliban. According to his Guantanamo case file, he “utilized his office to support al Qaeda” and was “central to the Taliban’s effort to form alliances with other Islamic fundamentalist groups.”
Mohammed Nabi Omari: Omari was a member of a joint al-Qaeda-Taliban cell in eastern Khost province, according to his case file, and “one of the most significant former Taliban leaders detained” at Guantanamo.
On a Saturday afternoon, Barack Obama appeared outside the White House in the spring sunshine with the parents of Bergdahl, an American soldier who had been held captive by the Afghan Taliban since 2009, to announce their son's freedom.
"This morning, I called Bob and Jani Bergdahl and told them that after nearly five years in captivity, their son, Bowe, is coming home," Obama said. "He wasn’t forgotten by his community in Idaho, or the military, which rallied to support the Bergdahls through thick and thin. And he wasn’t forgotten by his country, because the United States of America does not ever leave our men and women in uniform behind."
Later, national security advisor Susan Rice commented on ABC's This Week that Bergdahl, "served the United States with honor and distinction.”
AND NOW THE REST OF THE STORY:
Army Sergeant Bowe Bergdahl is expected to plead guilty to charges of... (Read More...)
A CONSERVATIVE SURPRISE IN AUSTRIA THAT COULD HAVE A MAJOR IMPACT ON THE EUROPEAN IMMIGRATION PROBLEM
Make Austria Great Again: The rapid rise of Sebastian Kurz whose policies have been seen as a “cure” to help solve the European immigration crisis. A recent poll published by the Kurier newspaper showed 33 percent of voters backed Kurz’s conservative party, with current Chancellor Christian Kern’s left-leaning Social Democrats running second at 27 percent. Kurz is the world’s youngest foreign minister. He became foreign minister of Austria at the age of 27, but at the age of 24 became the youngest cabinet member in the history of the Austrian republic.
The immigration policies of Kurz have been seen as a “cure” to help solve the European immigration crisis. Kurz’s plan was extremely far off of the beaten path from other European policies and ideas to curtail this issue. His philosophy was neither leaning left nor right, he took a third path: focusing on integration, and the Balkans. Kurz understood that he couldn’t welcome all immigrants into his small country nor could he cut them all off. 1 in 5 people in his country of Austria were born outside Austria, so he realized he had a duty to welcome these outsiders. Therefore, his new policy became “a sort of microcosm or petri dish for the demographic remaking of Europe.” A core to his immigration policy became his emphasis on assimilation. Therefore, he laid the groundwork to effectively integrate these refugees into Austria. This began with minimizing the number of immigrants. His policy showed that if there are too many refugees, due to the mere size of Austria, they would be unable to reach out and help these people. These numbers which reach approximately 10,000 people coming into the European Union daily. As a result, Kurz curtailed the mass influx of people coming from the Balkan region – the main source of a majority of the country’s immigrants. The Balkan agreement was made with Austria’s neighboring countries, making huge strides to minimize incoming numbers not only into Austria but across the European Union as well. Within Austria this resulted in less than 1,000 people coming into the country daily. Then, to continue along these lines, an agreement was made with Turkey which further decreased the influx to less than one hundred people a day. One hundred people a day was a number which Austria was much more equipped to handle.
While reducing the numbers, Kurz also set integration policies in place. Still understanding the importance of the Balkan region, integration officers were sent to this area to work with immigrants. Specifically, officers were sent to countries such as Turkey and Serbia. Kurz strongly believes, that countries “need to work with other countries and reach out to immigrants before they come … so that they can understand their rights and obligations.” Additionally, when he was the Secretary of Integration at the age of 25, he created education policies to ramp up early childhood education. Setting standards for entering elementary school knowing Germany was extremely important to integration, as emphasized by Kurz.
All of these ideas and policies were extremely unconventional, resulting in apprehension and even opposition from European powerhouses such as Germany for a good period of time. But, more recently, these countries have jumped on board and now this policy even garners support from German Chancellor Angela Merkel. As he continues to gain political footing and support as a result of these bold policies, Kurz is predicted to be a viable candidate for Austrian prime minister in the near future.
FIRST AND SECOND AMENDMENTS ARE THREATS TO THE MARXIST/PROGRESSIVE (DEMOCRAT) AGENDA
The biggest threats to the Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) agenda would be the Declaration of Independence, the United States Constitution, the First and Second Amendments to the Constitution, and the Bible. We have seen the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) attack the Declaration of Independence, the United States Constitution, and the Bible since the late 1800’s. In the last 50 years or so we have seen an assault on the First and Second Amendments.
To understand why the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) have assailed the First and Second Amendments, we must understand what their agenda is. The Democrat party has undergone a dramatic change over the last 150 years or so. They have transformed into the Communist Party of the United States. Lenin and Stalin specifically targeted the groups that now dictate the policies of that party; academia, the press, and Hollywood. The leadership of the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) has been indoctrinated in the progressive or communist agenda.
The mindset of the Marxist/Progressive Party (Democrat) is that all individuals are secondary to the group and must subjugate their wishes, desires, talents, and achievements to what is determined by them to be in the best interest of the group. It is necessary, according to the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats), that all who think differently from the group must be converted or eliminated. Ultimately, it is the desire of the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) to have only one economic class and one social class, but two political classes. The two political classes would be the few loyal members of the ruling party who dictate what is best for all others which is the other class.
The First amendment is in direct contrast to the achievement of the goals of the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats). The First Amendment states, “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.” The First Amendment was adopted specifically to provide a means protect freedom.
A free society requires independent thought with diverse ideas. A free society cannot exist without the rights protected by the First Amendment. Conversely, a collectivist society, or the society desired by the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) cannot tolerate these freedoms because...(Read More...)
EXAMPLES OF THE FRANKFURT SCHOOL INFLUENCE ON PROFESSORS WHO INDOCTRINATE AMERICAN STUDENTS
An Ithaca College professor calls the patriotic song “God Bless America” a “warmongering” song inappropriate for sporting events.
In a September 28 op-ed for the Ithacan, professor Stephen Mosher claimed that “expressions of hyper-patriotism” like the national anthem and songs like Irving Berlin’s God Bless America have “changed our ‘philosophy’ about what it means to be an ‘American’.
Mosher, who teaches “sport as political resistance” and “sport and popular culture” for Ithaca College’s Department of Communication Studies, claims that these songs should be banned from sporting events.
“Sporting events don’t need a national anthem,” he claims, adding that following the events of September 11, hyper-patriotism took hold and the song, “God Bless America,” took its place as an unofficial anthem for Americans.
He claims that many of these expressions and demonstrations “serve to minimize what real patriotism looks like,” pointing out that there is no requirement to hold a hand over your heart during the national anthem.
The professor recalls his time as a student at the University of Massachusetts-Amherts, where various events—including “so-called race riots, political assassinations, Olympic protests, and the disastrous Vietnam experience had altered [his] philosophy about the role sport plays in our society.”
He says that some black basketball players would turn their backs to the flag when the national anthem was being played, prompting fans to throw objects at them. He noted that even though these violent fans were removed from the game, nothing ever prompted the university to consider “NOT playing the national anthem.”
Mosher’s remarks come in the wake of NFL teams kneeling during the national anthem in protest of President Trump. The professor also takes issue with the use of the American flag on MAGA apparel and athletic uniforms, which he says violates the U.S. Flag Code.
“Of course, the most effective way to expose the jingoists spreading lies is to call their bluff that sports and politics shouldn’t mix,” he says. “To that end, why not simply abandon the practice? We don’t play the anthem before most church services or movies or concerts. The jingoists would have to find something else to be upset about, and those athletes who are concerned about issues of social justice could find alternative ways to bring those concerns to light.”
A Drexel University professor tweeted Monday that the Las Vegas massacre “is what happens when” white people “don’t get what they want.” George Ciccariello, a politics professor, suggested the “white supremacist patriarchy” was to blame for the mass shooting. Ciccariello previously came under fire in 2016 for tweeting “all I want for Christmas is white genocide.”
“It’s the white supremacist patriarchy, stupid,” stated Ciccariello Monday. “But liberals will drown out all discourse with a deafening chorus screeching ‘gun control.'”
These are examples of The Cultural Marxists Of the Frankfurt School subverting American education. They began as a Communist think tank at the Goethe University Frankfurt. They noted that the masses didn’t rise up during the First World War to overthrow capitalism; instead, the citizens fought for their countries. Only Russia became Communist, a place they didn’t expect Communism to take hold. Since they took the writings of Marx as gospel, all this was quite shocking. They decided they needed to prepare the way by breaking down traditional social ties—country, family, and religion—and afterwards the masses would embrace rule by a global Communist state.
Columbia University in New York City became the American Frankfurt School. Many of the students the Frankfurt School at Columbia taught, became teachers and professors, who taught another batch of teachers and professors, and they’re now indoctrinating our youth. The above two professors would be considered to be a product of the Cultural Marxist movement.
WHY MARXIST/PROGRESSIVES (DEMOCRATS) ADVOCATE FOR A “LIVING CONSTITUTION”
The Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) despise the United States Constitution. The Unites States Constitution represents everything the Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) opposes. The United States Constitution represents “rule of law.” The Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) believes in arbitrary law so the they can apply the law to whomever they wish and in whatever manner that fits their need at the time. The United States Constitution limits the power of the federal government. The Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) believes the federal governments purpose is to control the lives and thoughts of the people. The United States Constitution requires a divided government with power disbursed between the three branches of federal government and the governments of the states. The Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) believes in a totalitarian state and this requires concentrated power in one branch of the federal government.
Because the Marxist/Progressive and the United States Constitution are at opposite ends of the belief spectrum, the Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) has advanced the mistaken theory that the United States Constitution is and was always intended to be a living Constitution. A living Constitution is one that evolves, changes over time, and adapts to new circumstances, without being formally amended. Or, a living Constitution can mean anything we want it to mean to fit our immediate need and desire.
The Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) were shocked when their Marxist/Progressive candidate for president, Hillary Clinton, was defeated by a non-politician, Donald Trump. The Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) were certain Hillary would be elected and would continue to implement the fundamental transformation of the United States into a totalitarian Marxist state that Barack Obama promised. The American people said no thanks, for many reasons. The shell socked Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) have been trying to manipulate our system to rid the...(Read More...)
PLEASE, LET’S GET REAL
People who were blessed with extraordinary athletic ability are trying to tell us they are oppressed. People on television talk shows are claiming they are oppressed and supporting the ludicrous claims of the athlete. The only way there are oppressed people in America today is if we measure oppression on a scale of from one to ten, and call people who might be a nine on the scale oppressed.
Just what is oppression? The dictionary defines oppression as to burden with cruel or unjust impositions or restraints; subject to a burdensome or harsh exercise of authority or power: a people oppressed by totalitarianism. Oppression is not some police officer pulling you over and asking to see your driver’s license. Oppression is not some fool calling you a derogatory name. Oppression is not some individual with an opinion different from years verbally expressing that view. Those who would consider these acts of oppression are individuals looking to find any excuse to call themselves oppressed so they can get something for nothing.
I had the privilege to go to Romania over the week-end for my second time that country. I will probably go again. It is a beautiful country with wonderful people. The country is clean and appeared to be virtually crime free. The people are energetic, highly educated with most speaking three, four, or more languages, polite, and very kind and helpful.
The Romanian people are a people who have historically lived under tyrannical governments. A quick history of Romania shows us that these people have been ruled by the three major empires of that area, the Roman Empire, The Ottoman Empire, and the Austro-Hungarian Empire. They lived under a Monarchy for a century and then were cruelly dominated by Nazi Germany and then the Communists.
The Franklin Roosevelt administration was directly responsible for the Romanians and the rest of Eastern Europe being subjugated to the tyrannical rule of the Communists. It was Franklin Roosevelt, being greatly influenced by Communist Harry ...(Read More...)
FREEDOM LOVING AMERICANS ARE SAYING ENOUGH IS ENOUGH
We Freedom LOVING Americans still believe in the Declaration of Independence. We Freedom Loving Americans still believe in the United States Constitution. We Freedom Loving Americans still believe in Individualism. We Freedom Loving Americans do not support Collectivism (Communism, Marxism, Socialism, Progressivism, Liberalism). We Freedom Loving Americans, despite Obama, Sharpton, Jackson, The Black Caucus, and all the racists, believe what Martin Luther King, Jr said and look at the content of the character of the individual and not the color of the skin.
The Progressives who are following the dictates of Marx and creating change, revolution, and discontent to tear apart our free and independent society and fundamentally transform us to a totally conforming Marxist tyranny are awakening the Americans who greatly value their freedom.
After President Trump spoke up for tens of millions of voiceless Americans disgusted over spoiled NFL crybabies disrespecting the American flag and anthem, the controversy finally erupted over the weekend.
You would think that this firestorm would have resulted in record ratings for Sunday Night Football, or at least a ratings boost. Unfortunately for the anti-American NFL, the exact opposite proved true with an 8 percent drop in viewership, compared to last week. This is a new season low.
Compared to this time last year, the ratings decline was in the double-digits...(Read More...)
ARE YOU FAR RIGHT - I AM MANY TIMES CALLED A FAR RIGHT EXTREMIST
If you believe in independence and liberty you are far right according to the Marxist/Progressives and the press around the world. If you believe in the right to make your own decisions and not have government make them for you, you are far right. If you believe that as an individual you have the right, yes even the obligation you to have as your life goal to reach your maximum potential and live a happy life than you are far right. If you believe that you as a citizen of a nation have the right to refuse entry into your nation to people who have sworn to kill you and change the laws of your land to a set of rules that are totally contrary to your belief system, than you are far right. If you believe that it is not the duty nor the responsibility of government to confiscate your private assets and redistribute to people who believe it is their right to receive your private assets, than you are far right. If you believe in the principles stated in the Declaration of Independence and the United States Constitution, than you are far right.
In the world today, the founders of the United States would be considered to be far right. These people believed in the rights of the individual and not the domination of the collectivist or the community. The founders told us in the Declaration of Independence that our rights are given to us by our Creator and not by man or government. Yet today, people throughout the world are deemed to be...(Read More...)
THE UNITED STATES HAS MOVED MUCH CLOSER TO WHAT MARX ENVISIONED AS A CLASSLESS SOCIETY
Karl Marx believed in a totally conforming and equal society, financially, socially, and economically. What Marx said was that society should have only one class and since there was only one class then in fact there would be a classless society. The class that Marx saw prevail was the proletariat or wage earner and all other classes including the capitalist would be eliminated or merged into the proletariat.
Marx called for a worldwide revolution to make this happen but understood that in the more developed countries his classless society would not come about through a revolution but through a transformation. Whereas a revolution, such as the one in Russia and most of the Soviet bloc after World War II, China, and Cuba, the classless society would come about through dictatorial and tyrannical persuasion. Marx made his followers aware that harsh measures would have to be used. Transformation meant just that, a change to a classless society through political means over time. Marx also said that in both situations, current society would have to be destroyed and a new society rebuilt.
When Marx was talking about current society being rebuilt, he meant as he stated, all long-standing principles, all morality, and all religion or right and wrong would have to be eliminated and replaced with a secular society based on relative standards. Marxism can only exist in an atheist society. The society based on a strong family unit would have to be replaced with a society where the community or state and not the immediate family members were responsible for raising children. Marx understood, as Lenin implemented, that the state would begin their process of indoctrination from the cradle and continue it to the grave.
The United States has implemented many of the transformation necessities outlined by Marx with many more being implemented, or at least proposed, almost daily. Marx said that a steeply progressive income tax and a death tax would have to be implemented. This was done during the Wilson administration. The individual would...(Read More...)
ISLAMIC THREAT TO OUR FREEDOM AND LIBERTY IS REAL
Barack Obama was and is a true and tried friend of the Islamic world. It was Obama who enabled his brothers, the Muslim Brotherhood to gain control of Egypt, only to be later rejected by the Egyptians. It was Obama who found a way to bring Iran, the number one exporter of terror around the world, back from economic collapse, reward them with billions of dollars to assist with their terror atrocities, and pave the way for them to become a nuclear nation along with North Korea.
Trump was called every negative name imaginable by the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) and Islamic terror enablers when he announced he would limit the number of refugees that could enter the United States and restrict immigration from certain countries that were known to export Islamic terrorists. We in the United States were led to believe that all other nations were sympathetic to allowing Islamic terrorists into their countries because it was the kind and humane thing to do. After all, the leader of the Marxists and chief Islamic terrorist enabler, Barack Obama favored making the United States a Muslim nation so it must be right.
What we have recently learned is that a majority of Europeans want a ban on immigration from Muslim-majority countries, a poll has revealed...(Read More...)
REPUBLICAN ESTABLISHMENT CANNOT BE TRUSTED ON REPEAL
Prior to the 2016 elections, all we heard from the Republican establishment, (Ryan, McCarthy, McConnell, and Cornyn) was how they would repeal Obamacare. The House had voted on and passed full and total repeal of Obamacare several times. These hypocrites promised so many times that if they had a majority in both the House and the Senate and had a President who would sign the bill, Obamacare would be repealed in its entirety and the federal government would remove themselves from the health coverage and health care business other than Medicare and the VA. The majorities are in place and the president is in place, and Obamacare is still in place.
Ryan and McConnell brought different bills to their respective chambers that they referred to as “repeal and replace” but were in fact Obamacare II. If those fake repeal bills had passed, Obamacare would have become a Republican problem and the public would have punished them for the disaster Obamacare will become. If not truly repealed, Obamacare should be left alone to collapse on its own.
The Republican establishment leadership showed its total incompetence and ineptitude...(Read More...)
WHOOPI, A USEFUL IDIOT, SHOWS HER IGNORANCE AGAIN
They would like people to believe they know about what they speak. Yes, they are on television, radio, and the internet showing their ignorance. People believe what they say because the Marxist dominated forces behind our indoctrination system called grade school, high school, and college have taught these people to accept what the Marxists want them to believe and not question and research. The Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) movement in the United States is like a cult; believe what I tell you and do not question or research the conclusion I give you.
Whoopi Goldberg is a prime example of the loud and foolish pseudointellectuals on television, radio, and the internet demonstrating their ignorance time after time while the minions of the left applaud and cheer. Whoopi Goldberg, co-host of “The View,” doesn’t believe the narrative surrounding Antifa — the radical, militant left-wing group — and she believes the right is to blame.
This is what Whoopi said. I hope you can follow this convoluted speak. I believe she has listened to Nancy Pelosi to often because this is truly Pelosi speak. “So we went to see what they had been protesting, what fascist stuff Antifa had been protesting – there’s nothing there. We can’t find anything. This to me – Antifa is one of those things, I don’t want to say the right, but somebody came up with as a catch phrase so that you could say there’s violence on the other side. I’d never heard of this, and people kept saying on television — particularly on the other networks – “Well, this group.” I kept saying, “Who is this group?” Because when you see how stuff is organized, you can say “that’s who we are, we’re fighting for this.” But oftentimes I’ve found that sometimes the side that is kvetching the loudest has sort of orchestrated this so they can bitch about it. I’m not sure who was storming through the streets. I’m not sure who was storming through the streets.”
Whoopi, you poor foolish indoctrinated stooge, Antifa has been a part of the Communist movement, that movement you and your Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) friends are advocating for the United States. Here is a history lesson, a history lesson that is not taught in American schools because of the Marxist dominated influencers controlling our schools.
The extremist anarchist-communist group Antifa has been in the headlines because of recent violent clashes in Charlottesville, Virginia. Yet while the organization has been applauded by some left-leaning news outlets for including white nationalists and neo-Nazis in its list of targets, the organization wasn’t always about targeting “fascism,” as it claims.
The organization was initially part of the Soviet Union’s front operations to bring about...(Read More...)
JUST SOME RAMBLING THOUGHTS
I am wondering what Debbie Wassermann Schultz is thinking now that Imran Awan’s wife has struck a deal with the investigators and will be returning to the United States.
We are learning in the Bob Menendez trial that friendship is an excuse for criminal wrong doing and all charges, regardless of validity, should be dropped because they are just racist.
Trump, after being compared to Hitler and Mussolini, is now accused of emulating Pontius Pilate by Marxist/Progressive Ed Markey. Was Ed Markey guilty of violating the first amendment when he mentioned a Biblical story, especially one about Jesus.
Planned Parenthood, the #1 murderer in the United States, is defending the Dreamers claiming their right to life is now being challenged.
Trump strikes a deal with Schumer and Pelosi to raise the debt ceiling. Paul Ryan had called the proposal “ridiculous and disgraceful.”...(Read More...)
THE GOAL OF THE MARXIST/PROGRESSIVES (DEMOCRATS) IS REVEALED IN CHANT BY THEIR ALLIES ANTIFA
"No Trump, no Wall, no USA at all." This was the chant of the leftist activist group that hates free speech, believes in violence and intimidation, and has been praised as protectors of equality and social justice by prominent members of the Marxist/Progressive Party (Democrats) in Berkley the other day.
I heard this discussed on a talk show the other day. One of the participants in the discussion made the incorrect statement that most of the members of the Marxist/Progressive Party (Democrats) would not agree with the part of the chant that said, “no USA at all.” Not only was he wrong about most members of the Marxist/Progressive Party (Democrats) not agreeing with “no USA at all,” but he would be wrong if he said most members of the Republican establishment disagreed with that same sentiment.
Most, if not all members of what is considered the left in the United States today, wants the United States of America that was conceived with the ratification of the Constitution, to be obliterated. The same can be said about members of the American left who call themselves Republicans and are commonly known as the Republican establishment.
We know the above to be factual because those groups strongly and openly oppose the very ideals upon which the United States was founded. These groups want the core principles of the Constitution, rule of law, limited government, divided government, and the government as the servant and the people as the sovereign to become null and void. The left strongly believes in and advocates arbitrary law. Over the last several years we have seen the left abuse the core principle of all being treated equally under the law. The left has ignored murder, rape, and abuse to appease the Muslims, the rioters, illegal aliens, or anyone they would consider to be oppresed.
We have watched as the Obama regime ignored members of its...(Read More...)
DO NOT REMOVE
Don Jans, the author of "My Grandchildren's America", believes that America is great because of it's promises of individual freedom and opportunity. Like most grandparents, he believes his grandchildren will have the ability and desire to excel, if that opportunity is still available. Will the changes promised and happening now, limit these freedoms and opportunities?
Don has been a student of history for over 40 years. He has concentrated in the study of European history with an emphasis on Russian history. This led him to his study of Karl Marx and Marxism. In addition to being a popular speaker on Marxism, Don has also had articles published on the topic. He also has been a guest on regional and national media broadcasts.
Dec 1, 2014 Presentation with Don Jans http://www.thevillagesteaparty.org/dec-1-2014-with-don-jans.html
Dec 1, 2014 Special Interview with Don Jans
Contact info: email@example.com