No matter what your political party, if you love this country and its freedoms, you need to oppose Marxism! Think of the sacrifices of prior generations compared to how little this generation values our freedoms:
AT LEAST BILL MAHR UNDERSTANDS JIHADISTS, ISLAM, AND MUSLIM ARE THE SAME
HBO “Real Time” host Bill Maher, a noted liberal, clashed with a panel of guests on his show Friday night during a discussion about this week’s Islamic terror attack in London, which the Islamic State has claimed credit for.
During the discussion, panelist Louise Mensch, a former British MP, slammed British “partisans” for blaming the attack on the influx of Muslim migrants and refugees. She essentially implied that the attack had nothing to do with Islam.
But Maher was having none of it.
“Let’s not pretend that [the attack] has nothing to do with Islam, the religion,” he told Mensch.
She hit back and said this week’s attack had as much to do with Islam as Timothy McVeigh’s 1995 Oklahoma City bombing had to do with “Roman Catholicism.”
Maher shot back saying Mensch’s comparison is a “false equivalency.”
“Every time some bomb goes off, before it goes off, somebody yells ‘Allahu Akbar,'” Maher said. “I never heard anyone go ‘Merry Christmas, this one’s for the flying nun.'”
All four members of Maher’s panel disagreed with him, but he was unrelenting.
“Are there Christian terrorist armies like ISIS,” Maher asked. MSNBC host Chris Hayes, one of the members of Friday’s panel, suggested the IRA, a paramilitary Irish group designated as a terrorist organization by Britain, was one, but Maher quickly noted that there’s no current Christian terrorist organization.
“Are there Christian terrorist armies like ISIS, Al Qaeda, Boko Haram, al-Shabaab. Are there armies like that in the world that aren’t Muslim?” Maher asked again.
Mensch began to stutter an answer, while Hayes and the other panelists were silent.
“Let’s not f**k around with this anymore,” Maher said. “Can we please get real.”
Not only are these terrorists yelling Allahu Akbar while killing innocent victims, they are following the dictates of the Koran and the Prophet. Hatred and violence are also being taught and encouraged in Mosques around the world, not just in the Middle East. While death to Jews is being shouted by Iman’s, those same Muslims who are trying to separate these terrorist activities from their beliefs, are silent; we hear no condemnation. In fact, we hear only distancing from Jihadists from these groups with little to no condemnation
The Koran teaches evil and bloodshed so Islam can rule the world. That is the teaching. If a Muslim says he does not believe in these acts of evil, that Muslim is defying the Koran and the Prophet. Maher is correct.
WHAT TWO WELL KNOWN MUSLIMS THINK OF ISLAMIC TERRORIST ATTACKS
When we excuse and justify the actions of evil doers it emboldens the more timid and the incidents become more frequent and more horrendous.
Immediately following the Islamic terrorist attack on the British Houses of Parliament, Muslim Mayor of London Sadiq Khan told British citizens that Islamic terrorism was “part and parcel” of living in a big city.His sentiments were soon echoed by member of the Lord Digby Jones. “You’re safer in London than you’ve ever been,” Jones declared, adding, “If this turns out to be an act of Islamic terrorism, I think the fact that the man is a Muslim is utterly and completely irrelevant.”
As it happens, statements similar to those of Jones and Khan — representing the dangerously defeatist mindset pervasive in Western culture where it concerns Islam– were made by Barack Hussein Obama. We can absorb a terrorist attack. We’ll do everything we can to prevent it, but even a 9/11, even the biggest attack ever … we absorbed it and we are stronger.
The visible and offensive tendency to sanitize acts of Islamic terrorism and portray the atrocities committed by jihadis as issues of “law and order,” rather than wanton acts of war by an invading force, characterized by Jihadist sympathizer Obama. Like the Muslim mayor of London, Obama ostensibly wanted Americans to accept Islamic terrorism as the “new normal,” and in some cases, he elevated the attackers.
Remember, that Obama is a man who once told the NYT that the call to prayer is the “prettiest sound on Earth,” proposed giving Osama Bin Laden a trial, and his last week in office, released high risk terrorists from Gitmo.
Obama didn’t just accept the “new normal” now on display in London. He helped create it...(Read More...)
AND YET MARXIST/PROGRESSIVES CONTINUE TO ADVOCATE THESE POLICIES
The Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) continue to advocate the same principles that brought Venezuela to the point it is today. We saw the results of these same polices in Soviet Russia, the Soviet Bloc, Mao’s China, Castro’s Cuba, and many other examples. All of the above examples, along with the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats), continue to follow the doctrines spoken by Karl Marx; Wrest degree by degree the capital from the capitalist and centralize all elements of production in the hands of the state, Abolish all long standing principles, morality, and religion, and From each according to his abilities to each according to his needs.
These principles have been imposed by the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) on the citizens of the United States over the past hundred years or so. The result is that today we have a huge government that dictates to business how they are to run their day to day operations, that same huge government dictates to private citizens how to run their lives and what to think, we have an amoral society where political correctness defends those who would violate standards that have been the hallmark of society for years, and we now have a welfare system and safety net system that is taught to be based on Constitutional values which is an absolute falsehood.
Venezuela followed that very policies advocated by the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats). Today in Venezuela, families can wait in lines at the supermarket for 18 hours at a time to get the right to purchase small quantities of oil, rice or pasta. Violent crime, meanwhile, is on the rise, with the country's capital, Caracas, recently overtaking Honduras' San Pedro Sula to become the most violent city in the...(Read More...)
CITIZEN POLITICIAN OR PROFESSIONAL POLITICIAN
The politicians have created the mechanisms that have thwarted the intent of the founders that our government be a government where the people are the sovereign and those in government are the servants. When the United States became a nation, it was a sacrifice by an individual to serve in the government representing his fellow citizens. Today it is a sure way to wealth and power. Not only due congresspersons who are defeated or retire secure great lobbying positions, they are also given a generous pension.
Members of Congress are eligible for a pension at the age of 62 if they have completed at least five years of service. Members are eligible for a pension at age 50 if they have completed 20 years of service, or at any age after completing 25 years of service. The amount of the pension depends on years of service and the average of the highest three years of salary. By law, the starting amount of a Member’s retirement annuity may not exceed 80% of his or her final salary.
If we are to return to a citizen politician, the elected servant must be prohibited from becoming lobbyist and we the people should not pay them pensions. This would require that they return to the work position they held prior to being elected to serve. Washington returned to Mount Vernon and worked his farm.
Our Founding Fathers recognized the importance of having citizen...(Read More...)
SADLY, MORNING JOE IS CORRECT
Our founders understood when they established our government, that they were creating the single biggest threat to the freedom they had just won.” In order to preserve that freedom as best they could, for themselves and future generations of Americans, they established the principles of, rule of law, limited government, divided government, and rule by the people.
We are no longer a nation abiding by “rule of law.” We now operate under the concept that our constitution is a “living document,” meaning that the constitution can mean whatever.
Our government is not a limited government, but has grown to be a very powerful government that dominates our lives and interests and confiscates an unprecedented amount of the personal assets of the citizens.
Our government is no longer a divided government, but is now dominated by the Judicial branch that has and continues to usurp the powers and authority of the Legislative and Executive branches.
We are no longer a nation where the people are the sovereign...(Read More...)
MARXIST/PROGRESSIVE (DEMOCRATS) ADVOCATE FOR ARBITRARY RULE
The confirmation hearings are now under way for Supreme Court nominee Neil Gorsuch. The overwhelming question, as it has been in Supreme Court confirmation hearings for at least the last 50 years, is will the nominee interpret the Constitution as it was written or will they interpret the Constitution to forward a political philosophy. The Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) have advocated over these last 50 years that nominees should interpret the Constitution in a manner that will further their Marxist/Progressive agenda.
Our founders wrote the United States Constitution with the intent that it would be the ultimate law of the land. Understanding that things could and would change, the founders established procedures by which the Constitution could be amended. The procedure is not simple. The intent was that the Constitution would not be amended to accommodate fads or whimsy but it would accommodate long term needs.
The Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) believe that the intent of the founders should be minimized, yes even ignored. The Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) understand that the Constitution and the principle of “rule of law’ do not support their ideas. In order to subtlety abandon the Constitution and the “rule of law” the Marxist/Progressives have claimed that the Constitution is a living document, meaning they can arbitrarily determine its meaning.
What is the Rule of Law?...(Read More...)
EGREGIOUS JUDICIAL OVERREACH
A federal District Court judge in Maryland is considering whether he should order President Donald Trump to double the annual inflow of refugees up to 100,000 per year.
Any demand by the judge that the federal government airbus an extra 50,000 migrants — including many adherents of Islam’s sharia legal system — into American neighborhoods would be an unusual intervention into government roles normally left to the elected President and Congress.
This is the authority given to the courts by we the people per the United States Constitution. It would be an extreme stretch to find any place where the courts would have the authority to dictate numbers such as the above judge is proposing.
C O N S T I T U T I O N O F T H E U N I T E D S T A T E S
The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish. The Judges, both of the supreme and inferior Courts, shall hold their Offices during good behaviour, and shall at stated Times, receive for their Services, a Compensation, which shall not be diminished during their Continuance in Office.
The judicial Power shall extend to all... (Read More...)
PSEUDO CONSERVATIVES WILL BE EXPOSED
Many of these pretenders are already known; McConnell, Cornyn, McCain, Ryan, and McCarthy. You will notice that this is the group often referred to as the Republican Establishment. This is the same group that expressed opposition to Obama’s policies but voted for many of them because “it is important to get the governments work done.” Pseudo Conservatives will not be able to hide behind that excuse any longer.
The heart of the Conservative philosophy would use history to show that government has proved to be the chief instrument for thwarting man’s liberty. Government represents power in the hands of some to control and regulate the lives of others. And power corrupts.
There are a number of ways in which the power of government can be measured. One is the size of its governments financial operations, or government spending. Another would be the scope of government activities. A recent study found that the federal government is now the biggest land owner, property manager, renter, mover and hauler, medical clinician, lender, insurer, mortgage broker, employer, debtor, taxer, and spender in all history.
Another measurement of government power is the extent of government interference...(Read More...)
ONE TRUMP POLICY IS DAMAGING MARXIST/PROGRESSIVES (DEMOCRATS) PLANS
Karl Marx advocated open borders for his “fair and just classless society” which is also the end result of the fundamental transformation Obama promised just before the election of 2008. Marx said that it was necessary that the whole world be a “fair and just classless society” if the transformation was to be truly successful. Marx also emphasized that all workers must be able to cross borders at will and when the transformation was complete there would be no needs for borders. This is what the European Community is attempting to do and what the globalists are advocating. Bill Clinton is opposed to the world movement toward national borders and nations defending their interests and their borders, as are all other globalists.
Now we are learning that the Untied State’s southern border has become more secure just by the Trump administration discussing the wall and discussing enforcing our immigration laws. This is contrary to the goals of the Marxist/Progressive (Democrats) which are to have open borders so workers can...(Read More...)
March 10th, 2017
Twenty of the world's biggest banks have paid more than $235bn in fines and compensation in the last seven years. The financial institutions have been fined for a variety of imagined or real reasons ranging from manipulation of currency and interest rate markets and compensating customers who were wrongly sold mortgages in the US or insurance products in Britain.
The total scale of the payouts is roughly equivalent to the annual economy of Greece or Portugal.
The fines have affected the banks' efforts to rebuild capital, reduced dividends for investors and cut the amount firms are able to lend.
The misconduct bill, a euphemism used to justify this extortion, is expected to rise by tens of billions more dollars, and many politicians, regulators and industry observers said more needs to be done to deter wrongdoing.
Radical Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) activist groups collected millions from former Attorney General Eric Holder's record $17 billion extortion deal to settle alleged mortgage abuse charges against Bank of America. Buried in the fine print of the deal, which includes $7 billion in soft-dollar consumer relief, were a raft of political payoffs to Obama constituency groups. In effect, the government ordered the nation's largest bank to create a massive slush fund for Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) special interests.
The extortion deal required billions in debt forgiveness payments to...(Read More...)
THE DEATH SPIRAL OF A FREE COUNTRY
Here is the process, the death spiral of a free nation. Muslims are the only immigration group that comes to a country with its own ready-made model of society it believes to be superior. And they impose it — in the schools, in the workplace, in the marketplace of ideas, and with violence. Each component critical to the end result — the islamization of the country.
America needs to look no further than Europe as a great, terrible warning of what’s to come if we sit back and allow the Marxist/Progressives to turn over our freedoms to their Islamic partners. Obama and his fellow Marxist/Progressives such as Holder and Lynch have done exactly what the Islamic Jihadist Marxist/Progressives sympathizers have done in France. The one goal the Marxist/Progressives have with Islamic Jihadists is to dominate the world. The Marxist/Progressives, including Obama, Holder and Lynch, have certainly aided the Islamic Jihadists here in the United States and worldwide.
The following is from an article all should read. The similarities between the Marxist/Progressives in France and the Marxist/Progressives in the United States is remarkable. In so many of the events that have taken place in France, we can see identical happenings here in the United States.
France’s Death Spiral by Guy Millière, March 5, 2017:
In 1990, the “Gayssot law” was passed, stipulating that “any discrimination based on ethnicity, nation, race or religion is prohibited”. Since then, it has been used to criminalize any criticism of Arab and African delinquency, any question...(Read More...)
MARXIST LORETTA LYNCH CALLS FOR BLOOD IN STREETS
We are in the midst of a revolution. Marx explained that despotic means would be necessary to bring about his “fair and just classless” society. This is the society to which Obama referred when he stated he was about to fundamentally transform the United States. We know Obama is a Marxist as are many of his associates including Jarrett, Axelrod, Holder, and Lynch. The tactics to which they will stoop are no different from the tactics other revolutionaries who aspired to bring about a totalitarian state, used.
Loretta Lynch: Need more marching, blood, death on streets
The Obama regime’s former Attorney General Loretta Lynch has made an impassioned video plea for more marching, blood and death on the streets. She said, “It has been people, individuals who have banded together, ordinary people who simply saw what needed to be done and came together and supported those ideals who have made the difference. They’ve marched, they’ve bled and yes, some of them died. This is hard. Every good thing is. We have done this before. We can do this again.”
This is a part of the takeover...(Read More...)
Freedom Loving Americans must recognize and understand that Loretta Lynch and her Comrade’s will use any means they must to reach their desired ends; a totalitarian state where all conform to their dictates. This is the same end desired by the Hitler, Marx, and Mao who also called for any means to reach their ends...
THE POLITICAL PARTIES ARE DESTROYING THE UNITED STATES
"However, [political parties] may now and then answer popular ends, they are likely in the course of time and things, to become potent engines, by which cunning, ambitious, and unprincipled men will be enabled to subvert the power of the people and to usurp for themselves the reins of government, destroying afterwards the very engines which have lifted them to unjust dominion."
George Washington’s Farewell Address | Saturday, September 17, 1796
Washington was warning the American people against the negative impact that opposing political parties could have on the country. During his presidency, he witnessed the rise of the Democratic-Republican party in opposition to the Federalists and worried that future political squabbles would undermine the concept of popular sovereignty in the United States.
Today the United States has a national debt of over $20 trillion dollars. It is estimated that our Gross Domestic Product will be just over $17 trillion dollars. The places the United States in the same category as Greece; an nation with greater debt than GDP. The interest rate being paid on this debt is at historical lows. Interest rates can only increase. The entitlements, Social Security and Medicare, are not properly funded and threaten a financial crisis. These factors will only contribute to worsening the debt crisis. The political parties are not willing to discuss these problems honestly because of the political consequences.
At least 11 million people reside in the United States illegally. These individuals are lawbreakers. Ignoring that they are criminals and intentionally and knowingly flaunting their continuing criminality makes a mockery of one the key principles upon which our nation was founded, “rule of law.” For political purposes, this direct attack on a key principle of our nation is ignored.
Our military is at its weakest and lowest level in decades. Our influence in the world and the confidence other nations have in us is at the lowest level I can remember. The trust and faith our friends have in our good will and our word is at the lowest level I can remember.
We are witnessing a complete breakdown in society in Western Europe because they have allowed people into their countries who refuse to...(Read More...)
OBAMA'S POST WHITE HOUSE GOALS
On July 15, 2016 Obama addressed the Diplomatic Corps reception in Washington, D.C. Many Ambassadors to the United States attended. Obama simply reflects his globalist handlers when he suggested that the solution to the world’s problems will be found in everyone’s submission to a single globalist power. Obama believes that we should “build strong institutions to protect people from those impulses” of nationalism and cultural pride. In other words, all Americans should stop being so selfish and self-centered and surrender themselves to the global “common good”.
Furthermore, Obama said that “hatred and violence of a few ultimately is no match for the love and decency and hard work of people of goodwill and compassion. “ What happened to the War on Terror? In a war, the object is to crush the enemy into total defeat. In Obama’s war, we are supposed to crush them with love, decency, goodwill and compassion. Actually, Obama said this again in the same speech: “We will defeat these ideologies by offering a better vision of development and economic progress.”
This is purportedly the same goal of the 2030 Agenda promoted by the United Nations, where the new Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) are the answer to all of mankind’s problems. In the same context, Obama referred to “a new sustainable development set of goals to end extreme poverty and promote health and education and equality for all people, including women.”
This is the Preamble to “Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.”
This Agenda is a plan of action for people, planet and prosperity. It also seeks to strengthen universal peace in larger freedom. We recognise that eradicating poverty in all its forms and dimensions, including extreme poverty, is the greatest global challenge and an indispensable requirement for sustainable development. All countries and all stakeholders, acting in collaborative partnership, will implement this plan. We are resolved to free the human race from the tyranny of poverty and want and to heal and secure our planet. We are determined to take the bold and transformative steps which are urgently needed to shift the world onto a sustainable and resilient path. As we embark on this collective journey, we pledge that no one will be left behind. The 17 Sustainable Development Goals and 169 targets which we are announcing today demonstrate the scale and ambition of this new universal Agenda. They seek to build on the Millennium Development Goals and complete what these did not achieve. They seek to realize the human rights of all and to achieve gender equality and the empowerment of all women and girls. They are integrated and indivisible and balance the three dimensions of sustainable development: the economic, social and environmental.
And this is some background:
Strategic Plan of the Office of the President of the General Assembly
The historic 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development was adopted by all 193 Member States of theUnited Nations on 25 September 2015. It presented the world with a masterplan for...(Read More...)
These are the goals of the United Nations, the organization that exist because of the United States funding it. These are the goals of Obama and all Marxist/Progressives. This will be the post White House agenda of Obama.
LET US TELL THE TRUTH – ISLAM IS NOT A PROMOTER OF PEACE
I am so tired of hearing political correctness defend Islam as a purveyor of peace. People from all spectrums always qualify Islam with the statement that the “vast majority of Muslims are peaceful people.” My thought is, “so what.”
The 13th-century Mongols were known as barbaric plunderers intent merely to maim, slaughter, and destroy. This perception, based on Persian, Chinese, Russian, and other accounts of the speed and ruthlessness with which the Mongols carved out the largest contiguous land empire in world history, has shaped both Asian and Western images of the Mongols and of their earliest leader, Chinggis Khan. Yet, we know that the vast majority of Mongols were peaceful people who stayed at home and tended to the daily needs of their families and communities.
The Ottoman Empire was responsible for the Armenian Genocide. Non -Muslim citizens, Christians and Jews, lived as second class citizens with virtually all civil rights being denied them. They were also required to extra taxes, and were subject to cruel and inhumane punishment for the slightest transgression. Most of the Muslims living within the borders of the Ottoman Empire were peaceful.
At least 20 million people were killed under the regimes headed by Lenin and then by Stalin in Russia. Stalin was known to work late into the evening and then go out to his dacha and dine and drink with members of the Communist Party. He was also known to have the wives of people with whom he was dining, tortured, raped, and killed while he and the spouse of the victim were dining and drinking together. At least 20 million people were killed under Lenin and Stalin. Most of the Russian people were peaceful people.
The Nazi regime under Hitler is known to have tortured and killed over 12 million people in their concentration camps with over 6 million of these people being killed just because they were Jews. Most of the German people were peaceful people.
Mao's Great Leap Forward 'killed 45 million people in four years. Mao Zedong, founder of the People's Republic of China, qualifies as the greatest mass murderer in world history. Most of the Chinese people were peaceful people.
The number of people Castro had killed, tortured, and imprisoned in Cuba is unknown. We know it was a large number of people, especially when measured as a percentage based on the population of Cuba. Most of the Cubans were peaceful people.
Yes, many Muslims would perhaps prefer to live in peace with their fellow citizens, but the book they use as their rules by which to live says that, “Allah gave us orders to kill every infidel.”
These people of peace, when asked to support reform and peace refused. In December 2015, a small group of Muslims met in Washington, DC to discuss the reform of Islam. This group asked about how many mosques they had initially approached for support and the nature of the responses from those mosques was eye-opening:
We spent significant resources on this outreach over a period of ten months. We reached out through snail mail, e-mail, and telephone to over 3,000 mosques and over 500 known public American Muslims. We received only 40-plus rather dismissive responses from our outreach, and sadly less than ten of them were positive. In fact, one mosque in South Carolina left us a vicious voice mail threatening our staff if we contacted them again.
So, this group made over 3,500 contacts within the Muslim community, but received only a little over 40 responses, of which less than ten were positive. So, to work with these numbers, let’s say the group made 3,500 contacts and received nine positive responses. That means that only .0026 (a touch over one-quarter of one percent) of the Muslim organizations and Muslim individuals the group contacted responded in a positive manner. And the group had even received a “vicious voicemail” from a mosque as a result of these initial contacts.
What does the Koran say about killing infidels?
Then when the sacred months [after the Hajj] have passed, kill these Idolaters wherever you find them, and capture them and besiege them, and lie in wait for them in each and every ambush.
The Koran contains at least 109 verses that call Muslims to war with nonbelievers for the sake of Islamic rule. Some are quite graphic, with commands to chop off heads and fingers and kill infidels wherever they may be hiding. Muslims who do not join the fight are called 'hypocrites' and warned that Allah will send them to Hell if they do not join the slaughter.
This is what these “people of peace” are taught. The basics of Islam is not peace but world domination. World domination is what the Kahn’s sought, what the Ottoman Empire sought, and what the Communists sought. Even though many people within the borders of those nations who were led by advocates for world domination preferred peace, it did not stop the killing. When an ideology calls for evil, those who adhere to the ideology are supporting violence even though they voice support for peace. Islam advocates evil; it is not an ideology for peace.
AND YOU THOUGHT THE WAR WAS WON NOVEMBER 8
Napoleon thought he had won the war against Russia when the 1812 Fire of Moscow broke out on September 14, 1812 and Russian troops and most residents abandoned the city and Napoleon's vanguard troops entered the city following the Battle of Borodino. The supplies and food Napoleon expected to find in Moscow were non-existent., having been burned with the rest of the city. After waiting a month for a surrender that never came, Napoleon, faced with the onset of the Russian winter, was forced to order his starving army out of Moscow.
During the disastrous retreat, Napoleon’s army suffered continual harassment from a suddenly aggressive and merciless Russian army. Stalked by hunger, because the Russian Army had burned everything on their retreat from Napoleon, and the deadly lances of the Cossack, the decimated army reached the Berezina River late in November but found its route blocked by the Russians. On November 26, Napoleon forced a way across at Studienka, and when the bulk of his army passed the river three days later, he was forced to burn his makeshift bridges behind him, stranding some 10,000 stragglers on the other side. From there, the retreat became a rout, and on December 8 Napoleon left what remained of his army to return to Paris with a few cohorts. Six days later, the Grande Armée finally escaped Russia, having suffered a loss of more than 400,000 men during the disastrous invasion.
The Russians were willing to burn and destroy anything and everything in their goal of defeating Napoleon. They did not defeat Napoleon by winning battles. The Russians prevailed because they were willing to destroy anything and everything for ultimate victory.
The Marxist/Progressive Party (Democrat Party) has the same mentality as did the Russians under Czar Alexander I; victory at any and all costs. The Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) despise the Declaration of Independence and the United States Constitution. The Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) despise the principles upon which we were founded; rule of law, limited government, divided government, and rule by the people. Karl Marx explained that in order to establish the socially just, totally equal, and totally conforming fair and just classless society (communist), that he, Marx, and the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) desire, all long standing principles, morality, and religion must be destroyed.
The Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) have been actively and openly destroying religion and promoting immorality for over 100 years in the United States. The Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) have been destroying the railing against the Declaration of Independence and the United States Constitution for over 100 years. The Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) have advocating against the principles of rule of law, limited government, divided government, and rule by the people for over 100 years.
The Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) supported and elected as president, a self-proclaimed progressive, Woodrow Wilson, who fought to change the very structure of our government as established by the Constitution. The Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) supported and elected as president, FDR, who openly brought into his administration, known and self-proclaimed Communists. The Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) supported and elected a known Marxist, Obama. Obama was schooled in Marxism virtually from the day of his birth. Obama proceeded to study and promote the precepts of Marxism, to this very day.
The Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) suffered an unexpected set-back in their commitment to transform the United States into a Marxist state, when they nominated a law breaker and liar who was also a very poor and lazy candidate, Hillary Clinton, who proceeded to lose the election. If anybody thinks for one moment that these Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) will not continue in their efforts to transform the United States into their desired Marxist state, those same people probably believe Napoleon did capture Russia. The Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) will burn and destroy the United States to achieve their goals, just as the armies of Alexander I did. The Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) have no regard for truth, they have no regard for decency, they have no regard for honor, they have no regard for fairness, they have no regard for dignity, and they have no regard for honesty. The Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) march to only one principle and that is, “the ends always justify the means.”
November 8 was simply a battle. The Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) have sworn to become even more vicious and evil. We witnessed this when they nominated as their Chairman, Tom Perez, who immediately named Keith Ellison as deputy chairman. The Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) have now doubled down on the Marxist policies of Obama with an even greater tendency for violence and destruction, leaning more to open rebellion per Ellison as opposed to transformation.
The Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) will not rest until they have destroyed what was intended to be a free and capitalist United States and have made it into a socially just and fair and just Marxist state. We Freedom Loving Americans cannot rest either, even though we won the battle on November 8. We must continue to fight for our freedom. Our goal must now be to transform our schools back into units of education as opposed to the indoctrination vessels they have become.
WHY DOES THE LEFT DEFEND THE EVIL THAT IS ISLAM
It’s becoming increasingly difficult to talk honestly about Islam. For the left, in particular, it’s a kind of heresy to suggest that Islam has a problem.
All religions are not the same. All faith traditions are not equally wise or equally tolerant or equally peaceful. A fundamentalist Jain is not the same as a fundamentalist Christian. A devout Quaker and a committed Wahhabist have very different ideas about justice and equality and morality. And to the extent that Quakers and Wahhabists live by the light of these ideas, the differences between them are vast and consequential.
What happened in Paris last weekend was both tragic and banal. And like mass shooting incidents in America are as depressing as it is familiar. Commentators on the Left, focused on our own complicity and on the need to counter “Islamophobia.” Liberals defend values of Islamists, who turn women into cattle and children into ...(Read More...)
WALLACE AND MCCAIN PROMOTE CURTAILING FREEDOM
The First Amendment:
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
Congress cannot make any law abridging the freedom of the press. Freedom of speech is essential to a free society. The freedom of the press is essential to a free society. Censorship is detrimental to freedom. Those who considered themselves journalists must have the freedom to report as they see fit whether it is fake news or not. However, the citizens have freedom of speech and thus have the right and the duty to criticize journalists as they see fit. Criticism of a journalists is not a threat to abridge the freedom of the press but is simply an exercise of free speech. Somebody explaining that the press is an enemy of the people is in no way a step toward dictatorship.
President Donald Trump’s recent criticisms against the media earned the ire of Fox News host Chris Wallace, who argued on “Fox and Friends” that Trump recently “crossed an important line” when he declared the “fake news” media to be the “enemy of the American people.” Trump did not cross any line, he simply exercised his constitutional right of free speech.
“We can take criticism. But to say...(Read More...)
GLOBALIZATION IS A FAILURE BECAUSE COLLECTIVISM ALWAYS FAILS
Globalization is another word for Collectivism. Collectivism is an ideology which incorporates all of the damaging ideologies (Marxism, Communism, Socialism, Nazism, and Progressivism.) These ideologies all profess conformity and egalitarianism. They discourage the individual from striving to be their best. They all belief that the goals and ambitions of the individuals should be subjugated to the stated goals of the group. They believe that competition is damaging to the group and to the individual. Their result is always a restriction on progress and innovation.
Facebook Inc Chief Executive Mark Zuckerberg, a Collectivist, laid out a vision of his company serving as a bulwark against rising isolationism, writing in a letter to users that the company’s platform could be the “social infrastructure” for the globe.
Zuckerberg’s comments come at a time when many people and nations around the world are taking an increasingly inward view. U.S. President Donald Trump pledged to put “America first” in his inaugural address in January. That followed Britain’s decision last June to exit the European Union.
The result of Britain moving forward with Brexit has brought about economic optimism.
The average forecast for UK economic growth has more than tripled since Britain’s vote to leave the European Union (EU) as economists...(Read More...)
THE INCONSISTENT AND MISGUIDED LEFT IS A REAL THREAT TO FREEDOM
The First Amendment is paramount to the United States remaining a free society.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
The very first freedoms a Marxist, Fascist, Communist, Socialist, or Collectivist Regime will subvert are freedom of speech, assembly, and the press. In a free society, we must always defend the right of free speech, including that of people like Yvette Felarca. The ironic twist is that she wants to prevent others from speaking even if it takes violent means and she calls the speaker “fascist” even though she is advocating the very tactics employed by the Nazi’s and other despotic groups.
Freedom of speech and the right of the people “peaceably” to assemble was discussed on the Tucker Carlson Program last evening.
“Fox News host Tucker Carlson had a heated 10-minute interview on his show Monday night with Yvette Felarca, a middle school teacher and organizer for the violent, left-wing protest group By Any Means Necessary.
Felarca, who helped organize the violent protests at UC Berkeley...(Read More...)
DO NOT REMOVE
Don Jans, the author of "My Grandchildren's America", believes that America is great because of it's promises of individual freedom and opportunity. Like most grandparents, he believes his grandchildren will have the ability and desire to excel, if that opportunity is still available. Will the changes promised and happening now, limit these freedoms and opportunities?
Don has been a student of history for over 40 years. He has concentrated in the study of European history with an emphasis on Russian history. This led him to his study of Karl Marx and Marxism. In addition to being a popular speaker on Marxism, Don has also had articles published on the topic. He also has been a guest on regional and national media broadcasts.
Dec 1, 2014 Presentation with Don Jans http://www.thevillagesteaparty.org/dec-1-2014-with-don-jans.html
Dec 1, 2014 Special Interview with Don Jans
Contact info: firstname.lastname@example.org