Don Jans' - BOOKS AVAILABLE HERE
Receive 5% discount
No shipping or handling charges
At Checkout Add Coupon Code: AM
Review of "The Road To Tyranny" "Your definition of Individualism and Collectivism was clear and relevant. I had heard about the slippery slope before, I now understand what it is and that it is real. You made so clear how our freedom and liberty are under attack. The book was easy to read and to understand. I really appreciate that you did not resort to “bumper sticker” attacks but stayed with reason and facts. I have purchased more books to give to people who would never otherwise be aware of what is happening.
POLITICAL PARTIES WILL DESTROY THE UNITED STATES WASHINGTON AND ENGELS TOLD US
George Washington said, “There is nothing which I dread so much as a division of the republic into two great parties, each arranged under its leader, and concerting measures in opposition to each other. This, in my humble apprehension, is to be dreaded as the greatest political evil under our Constitution.”
George Washington again, “All obstructions to the execution of the laws, all combinations and associations, under whatever plausible character, with the real design to direct, control, counteract, or awe the regular deliberation and action of the constituted authorities, are destructive of this fundamental principle, and of fatal tendency. They serve to organize faction, to give it an artificial and extraordinary force; to put, in the place of the delegated will of the nation the will of a party, often a small but artful and enterprising minority of the community; and, according to the alternate triumphs of different parties, to make the public administration the mirror of the ill-concerted and incongruous projects of faction, rather than the organ of consistent and wholesome plans digested by common counsels and modified by mutual interests.”
Fredrick Engels also saw the destructive power of politics in the Untied States when he said, “Nowhere do “politicians” form a more separate and powerful section of the nation than precisely in North America. There, each of the two major parties which alternatively succeed each other in power is itself in turn controlled by people who make a business of politics, who speculate on seats in the legislative assemblies of the Union as well as of the separate states, or who make a living by carrying on agitation for their party and on its victory are rewarded with positions. It is well known how the Americans have been trying for thirty years to shake off this yoke, which has become intolerable, and how in spite of it all they continue to sink ever deeper in this swamp of corruption. It is precisely in America that we see best how there takes place this process of the state power making itself independent in relation to society, whose mere instrument it was originally intended to be. Here there exists no dynasty, no nobility, no standing army, beyond the few men keeping watch on the Indians, no bureaucracy with permanent posts or the right to pensions. And nevertheless, we find here two great gangs of political speculators, who alternately take possession of the state power and exploit it by the most corrupt means and for the most corrupt ends – and the nation is powerless against these two great cartels of politicians, who are ostensibly its servants, but in reality, dominate and plunder it.”
When party leaders place the good of the party over the good of the nation their actions prove they ultimately place party over country. Diane Feinstein did exactly this and proved by her actions that the words of both Washington and Engels were prophetic; political parties will bring about the destruction of a great nation. Great nations can only continue to flourish when those in positions of power place the nation over the political party or their own personal desire for power and riches.
Diane Feinstein was not wrong to make the accusations against Judge Kavanaugh known. She was completely wrong in how she did this. She made these accusations known at the time she did for the purpose of not only destroying a life but also the nomination of Judge Kavanaugh. If Feinstein had placed nation over party, she would have completely disclosed these accusations to the Judicial committee prior to the Kavanaugh hearing so a full and complete investigation could have taken place. If they were proven to be true, Kavanaugh and the administration should have been notified understanding that this accusation would be an issue in the hearing. If the accusation was proven to be false, it would never have been a part of the hearing nor would it be an issue today.
Feinstein did this disservice to the United States for political and personal reasons. The political reason was to insert politics into the court system even more than it is today. The personal reason is because she is facing a tougher race for reelection to the Senate than she anticipated. Feinstein is a hero to her far left base but is a scourge to our Nation that can only remain free when politicians play fair and place nation above party.
Washington was correct and that is understandable. Engels was also correct and that is remarkable that the co-author of "The Communist Manifesto" would understand his followers in the United States (the Democrats) would use every available method to destroy our freedom and independence and bring about the tyrannical classless society of Marx and Engels.
POLITICAL CORRECTNESS MASKS EVIL AND REALITY
The modern left has taught people that the way to evade difficult situations is to simply call them something else. We are then told by using a euphemism the problem has been solved and all will be good. We are told that if we use the word choice the act of taking the life of a baby is simply a medical procedure. We are told if we use the word undocumented, the fact that a crime of illegal entry has been committed has never happened and the repercussions are simply an over dramatized account by racists and xenophobes. We are also told that if we view the Muslim religion as the religion of hate as opposed to the religion of peace we are Islamophobic and demonizing some manufactured per cent of those who would follow the teachings of the profit Muhammad.
We are told that it is only the misguided Islamic Radical Jihadist Terrorists that want to harm anybody who does not claim allegiance to their religion. Yet, Muslims follow the teachings of the Quran or the book of Allah. The book of Allah, purportedly the eternal never-changing charter of conduct for the individual and the society at large, is singularly wanting. It emphatically and repeatedly vilifies and condemns the kefirs — all non-Muslims. A total of about three percent of the verses of the Quran seem to say something positive about non-Muslims. Yet even these few verses are immediately followed by verses that discard them.
First, there was the Islam of Mecca, or the Islam of weakness. For thirteen years, Muhammad’s teachings, as recorded in the early suras of the Quran, were about hellfire and damnation, but not about punishment of the unbelievers in this world. Very few people were attracted to what he preached. In fact, the people scorned the man, harassed him, and eventually made him flee his hometown of Mecca for Medina. Then a major mutation took place: the Islam of Medina, or the “Islam of Tyranny,” arrived on the scene. The Quran’s suras of Medina are replete with exhortations of intolerance, exclusivity, and sanctioning of violence against non-Muslims. This mutation deeply appealed to the temperament of the Arab Bedouins, and they flocked to Muhammad’s beliefs.
The People of the Book, Jews and Christians are subject of the Quranic approval only if they recognize that their holy books are corrupt while the Quran is the one true book.
Ironically, Allah, who is claimed by Muhammad to be the creator of all, does not even bother addressing people of other faiths, such as Zoroastrians, Hindus, Buddhists, or those of no faith. Why are all these folks left out? Could it be because Muhammad did not know about them, that Muhammad had contacts only with Jews and Christians?
Muslims and their apologists selectively cite the positive verses of the Quran to impress upon others its goodness and convince them that the book is indeed about peace, tolerance and the brotherhood of all people. It is in this spirit of misrepresentation that Islamic organizations in the West spend huge sums in spreading their propaganda through the media by claiming that Muslims are indeed kin of Jews and Christians; that the only three faiths Islam recognizes are members of the Abrahamic family.
Acceding to Muslims, Islam was made for men. Women are playthings of men. Islam is 100% misogynist. Men are superior to women. Women are to obey men and are to be beaten when they disobey or misbehave. Islam is racist. The Quran stipulates that Arabs are superior to all others and it clearly condones slavery. It explicitly stipulates discriminatory laws for slaves. Islam denounces other belief systems and marginally recognizes the validity of only two religions, Judaism and Christianity. The nature of Islam is based on violence. It not only condones jihad, it recommends it and promises great reward for the jihadist.
Here is the truth, as bitter as it may be. Islam is the culprit. Islam is anything but a religion of peace. Violence is at the very core of Islam. Violence is institutionalized in the Muslim’s holy book, the Quran, in many suras.
The Quran as a Charter of Hate
It is impossible to accept the Quran as a book of the loving creator of the universe, as Muslims claim. Why would the creator Allah, an all-merciful and compassionate, as the Quran calls him, vilify, despise and consider all non-Muslims as worthy of torment? Studying the Quran shows it to be a charter of hate, more than anything else. A few examples will suffice:
Non-Muslims are the worse beasts (sura 8:55);
Jews are despicable apes (suras 2:65) and says the Jews are like donkeys (sura 62:5);
In the daily prayers that involves seventeen recitations of Al-Fatehe (sura 1), the Jews are demonized and the Christians are castigated;
The Quran condones terrorism (surahs 8:12, 8:59);
Killing a Jew earns the Muslim admission in Allah’s paradise (sura 9:11).
Forbids asking questions about it, because one may lose his faith (sura 5:101-102);
Allah is the one who leads people astray and will punish them for it (suras 5:41, 7:155, 16:53, 6:49);
Satan, or the devil, can harm people only by Allah’s permission (sura 58:10). Would not this make Allah responsible for harming people?
Not long ago, a rapist was acquitted by an Islamic court in the Islamic Republic of Iran for his crime by pleading that Satan made him do it. The judge ruled that he cannot punish the real culprit, Satan. The man, therefore, was found not guilty of the crime. A truly Islamic form of justice, squarely based on the Quran.
Unfortunately, Islam cannot be reformed, since Islam claims it is the perfect eternal faith for mankind. Splits have occurred and will continue to occur in Islam. Yet reformation has not happened in nearly 1400 years and is not going to happen. Allah’s book is sealed.
More and more Western countries are appeasing the Muslim and adhering to the hatred taught within its covers. Political correctness is saying this is the way to peace and understanding. According to the Muslim, peace can only exist when all adhere to the terms of the Quran. Understand what the politically correct term or phrase really means, or more appropriately what the term is really concealing.
THE PROGRESSIVE MOVEMENT IS IN FACT A REGRESSIVE MOVEMENT
The progressive movement is not a progressive movement, but a regressive movement. Progressive has been defined as making use of or interested in new ideas, findings, or opportunities. Regressive is defined as returning to a former or less developed state; characterized by regression. Regression is what the Marxist/Progressive movement is advocating for the United States today.
Sovereign is used to describe the person or institution that is the highest power. The sovereign has the final say in all decisions. When the United States became a nation, our founders took a dramatic turn from history. Government had always been the ultimate power over people. What the head of government said or declared was the law of the land and the individual had no recourse. The sovereign rulers said in fact they were sovereign because they were the agent of God here on earth, thus legitimizing their sovereignty. Our founders acknowledged the sovereignty of God but differed from the rest of the world in that they did not place an individual or institution in the middle between God and the people. Our founders said that the role of government was not to rule the people but to serve the people and to insure the rights given by God directly to man were not infringed upon by government. The role of government was not to act as ruler on earth because the people would have the role of sovereign on earth.
The founders were incredibly forward-looking people, in fact they were liberal or progressive because they changed the way government was to be viewed from the way it had been viewed for centuries prior. Americans are not taught this in history classes. The fact is that history has been rewritten so many Americans view the founders as being regressive thinkers so the modern “progressive” will have their views regarded as progressive and not seen as the regressive views they really are.
What we are witnessing in the United States today is the movement to establish government’s role as sovereign once again. The modern progressive movement has taken the position that what are considered to be inalienable rights granted by our Creator to us as individuals; freedom of speech and thought, freedom to peaceably assemble to voice our disagreements, freedom to worship God as we choose, freedom to object to government when government views it’s role as sovereign, and so many more rights that are not mentioned as stated by the Ninth Amendment, are really rights to be granted by government as they wish.
What we are witnessing in the United States today is a movement orchestrated and controlled by “elites” who believe the happiness of individuals is best determined by them as opposed to the individual. These movements are extremely regressive movements and take us back to the darkest days of history when the Sovereign literally ran the lives of the individual and dictated all actions of the individual. Karl Marx described this as a classless society. In the classless society all people would conform to the same thoughts and ideas. All people would be equal in all aspects of society including social, political, and economics. Individuals differences were not to be recognized, especially when those individual differences would be detrimental to the group as determined by the group.
Freedom can only exist when the individual is not only allowed but encouraged to exercise those inalienable rights given to us by our Creator. Perhaps the most important of these rights is that right to thoughts and ideas and the freedom to express these thoughts and ideas. The Marxist/Progressive movement in the United States today is telling us that if we do not conform to their collectivist ideal than we are not only reactionary, but regressive. The exact opposite is what history would tell us to be the truth.
The regressive would demonize any who disagreed with their idea that the women’s right to choose was a right of liberation as opposed to an action that denies the right to be born by another individual, that weather, even climate, has changed throughout history, that individuals, regardless of race or gender are to be treated equally based on their individuality, that all individuals should not be limited in their desire to achieve in whatever field they chose, and that we as individuals have the freedom to make choices and we as individuals reap or suffer the consequences.
What the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) are telling us today is that we as individuals must accept the role of government as our sovereign. What many of that movement further advocate is that no Creator exists, therefore their role of sovereign is supreme. This is the same position assumed by many of the ancient dictators as well as many of the modern actual or aspiring dictators including Lenin, Stalin, Mao, Castro, and Obama and his fellow comrades.
JOBS REDUCE POVERTY – NOT GOVERNMENT WELFARE PROGRAMS
With unemployment steadily declining and more people working in full time year-round jobs, household incomes in the United States rose last year, and the nation’s poverty rate declined to its lowest level in more than a decade according to new federal government data. The decline in poverty rates naturally declines as people work. People go to work when taxes are lowered, and government regulations are reduced. History has proven this rule to be as consistent as is the rule of gravity.
While all people know this to be true, why does the Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) contingent always call for higher taxes and more regulation while at the same time claiming it is their goal to help the poor and lower the poverty rate. Their stated goal is inconsistent with their stated actions. They know it.
We must understand that it has never been the goal of any collectivist movement to help the people they claim they want to help. The Marxist, communist, socialist, and progressive movements have always known that to make the claims they make is the ticket to them gaining power. As they raise taxes, increase regulations, and place more people on government welfare programs, they are purposefully enslaving more people to the master the sate and increasing their power base.
It is not the goal of the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) to help anybody but themselves. As they purposefully limit economic growth, the perception the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) are creating is that they have the answer to solve the very problem they knowingly created. During the Obama regime, the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) were proud of the record numbers of people that were on food stamps and receiving welfare checks. The Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) praised the goodness of government and tried to make the argument that this is why government should collect even more taxes and place even more regulation on business.
If Trump had not won, we would have seen a tax increase instead of a tax decrease, we would have seen even more regulation and not a massive roll back in regulation, we would have seen an increase in the poverty rate, and we would have heard why government is so good and not witnessing how capitalism reduces poverty and socialism increases poverty once again.
The Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) agenda is the same agenda as that put forth by Marx and followed by Lenin, Stalin, Mao, Castro, and Chavez. That agenda is to control the population and force upon all people the concept of total conformity to the Marxist ideology while bringing about equality, or poverty, for all except the elite in government.
The pattern is clear. The pattern was not created by Marx. The pattern has failed every time it has been implemented. The pattern always ends in total societal and financial failure. The pattern cannot succeed. The pattern is always brought about by the collectivist movement through deceit and violence. The Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) movement in the United States is employing, encouraging, and enabling deceit and violence. If successful in bringing about the fundamental transformation promised by Comrade Obama, the result for the United States will be a total failure of society and a failure of our financial system. This result is as sure as is the result that gravity will always pull objects back to earth.
LEFT WILL NOT DENOUNCE VIOLENCE – IT IS IN THEIR DNA
House Majority Whip Steve Scalise (R-La.) said Wednesday that Democrats need to denounce violence done in the name of politics, after a man allegedly attempted to stab a GOP congressional candidate in California.
“There’s no place for it. If somebody on the right was doing it, we’d be vocally denouncing it. They need to be denouncing it on the left,” Scalise said on "Fox and Friends."
The assailant in the Tuesday attack allegedly shouted profanities about President Trump before attempting to stab Republican Rudy Peters, who is running in the state's 15th District.
Fox News host Ed Henry also brought up recent confrontations between Trump administration critics and officials that have happened in restaurants and other public places. Rep. Maxine Waters (D-Calif.) drew criticism in June for encouraging Americans to continue the confrontations, which the critics call harassment.
“They need to be denouncing that kind of activity,” Scalise said.
“You should not incite violence, or any kind of assaulting people based on their political views and especially if it’s somebody who’s working in the administration and you’re attacking them because of what they do and what they believe in," he said. "That’s not what American ideals are about.”
Scalise was critically wounded by gunfire when a man who authorities say was “fueled by rage against Republican legislators” opened fire on him and three others last June.
“Leadership on the Democrats’ side needs to stand up and say this is wrong, no matter what your differences with the president or anybody else, you go and you solve them,” Scalise separately told Fox Business Wednesday. “We’re going to have an election in a few weeks, that’s how you resolve it. You don’t resort to violence.”
Scalise added that Democrats “need to be called out” by the mainstream media.
“If you saw this happen on the right, you know where the mainstream media would be,” Scalise said. “The mainstream media needs to be in the same place, calling this out too, and calling on leaders on the Republican and Democrat side to denounce it.”
The Marxist movement, which is the left in the United States today, will not denounce violence. Marx encouraged revolution. Marx explained that the current society must be destroyed so the Marxist Classless society called for by the Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) movement in the United States, can completely rebuild their desired totally conforming and totally equal society.
Collectivist movements, such as we see taking place in the United States today spearheaded by the Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) movement, have followed the dictates of Marx and through violence destroyed the existing society. We saw it in Russia, later the Soviet Union, headed by Lenin and then Stalin. We saw it in the Soviet Satellite countries, Hitler’s Germany, Mao’s China, Castro’s Cuba, and now Chavez’s Venezuela. The fundamental transformation of the Untied States called for by Comrade Obama is the same fundamental transformation that took place in the above; the same transformation Marx said must take place to bring about his communist society.
The Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) understand that if their desired fundamental transformation is to occur, they must use every means possible, including but not limited to propaganda, deceit, lying, and any and all types of violence. After all they understand that, “the ends always justify the means.”
We Freedom Loving Americans must understand the DNA of the Marxist. We must understand their only standard is a double standard. We must be aware of history and understand how much they despise the American electorate for derailing their plans in 2016. We must work ten times as hard in 2018 to be sure that the Marxist movement does not capture either house of congress. We must enable the building of the wall, the return to the Declaration of Independence, The Constitution of the United States, and the Bill of Rights. We must once again return our schools to systems of education and not systems of indoctrination.
It is a big job, but it is no bigger than the job our founders had before them in the 1770’s and 17780’s. Never forget the rallying cry of Sam Adams, “It does not take a majority to prevail, but a tireless minority committed to setting brush fires of freedom in the minds of men.”
We must be tireless and never stop setting those brush fires of freedom. We will then remain a free and independent people; yes free from the tyranny of government.
OBAMA EXPLAINS HIS HATRED FOR THE DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE, THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION, AND THE BILL OF RIGHTS
Obama is once again in the public eye exposing his collectivist (communist, Marxist, socialist, progressive) views and skillfully twisting them as if they were the goals of the founding fathers. The principles upon which the United States was founded are in direct contrast with the goals of Communist Obama and his fellow comrades. Obama’s promise to fundamentally transform the United States has been revealed to mean he wants to fundamentally transform the United States into a nation that would emulate all government control that prompted the colonists to revolt.
Our nation was founded as an Individualist nation where the individual is encouraged to pursue their own happiness, even when that happiness does not conform to the dictates of “common standards.” Americans were taught to pursue their dreams, even when those dreams did not conform to the prevailing norms of the day. Our founders understood that government is one of the major obstacles to a nation being great, because the individuals who comprise government have the natural propensity to dictate to the citizen their thoughts and their ideas; such as Jimmy Carter stating that the United States would have to limit their ambitions because of the “energy shortage.”
This is from a recent speech given by Comrade Obama:
“It did not start with Donald Trump. He is a symptom, not the cause. He’s just capitalizing on resentments that politicians have been fanning for years, a fear and anger that’s rooted in our past, but it’s also born out of the enormous upheavals that have taken place in your brief lifetimes.”
During his Illinois speech, Obama explained, “Of course, there’s always been another, darker aspect to America’s story.
“Progress doesn’t just move in a straight line. There’s a reason why progress hasn’t been easy and why throughout our history every two steps forward seems to sometimes produce one step back.
“Each time we painstakingly pull ourselves closer to our founding ideals, that all of us are created equal, endowed by our Creator with certain inalienable rights, the ideals that say every child should have opportunity and every man and woman in this country who’s willing to work hard should be able to find a job and support a family and pursue their small piece of the American dream, ideals that say we have a collective responsibility to care for the sick and the infirm and that and we have a responsibility to conserve the amazing bounty, the natural resources of this country and of this planet for future generations — each time we’ve gotten closer to those ideals, somebody, somewhere has pushed back.
“The status quo pushes back. Sometimes the backlash comes from people who are genuinely, if wrongly, fearful of change.
“More often, it’s manufactured by the powerful and the privileged who want to keep us divided and keep us angry and keep us cynical because it helps them maintain the status quo and keep their power and keep their privilege. And you happen to be coming of age during one of those moments.
The record of Obama reelects very clearly what Obama meant when he stated he will fundamentally transform the United States.
The United States Constitution and the Bill of Rights limit the rights and powers of government while establishing that our Creator gave us what are called Natural Rights or those rights that protect individuals to be the person God created and not the person the government believes we should be. It is the understanding that we are individuals limited only by our individual abilities and desires and that allowed the United States to become the exceptional nation it became. Obama condemned the United States for rising above the conforming standards to which he adheres and denounced the United States for its economic and military leadership continually.
Obama, through executive order and regulation violated the words of the United States Constitution and the spirit of the Declaration of Independence, The United States Constitution, and the Bill of Rights, by placing government limitations on our Natural Rights, by changing and nullifying constitutional law, and by legislating through the executive branch. His actions always increased the power of government and limited the rights of the individual.
Obama served the purpose of enemies of the United States who had declared war against us. This is defined as treason by the Constitution. Obama lifted sanctions on Iran at a crucial point and enabled the Iranians to continue their pursuit of nuclear weapons, so they could destroy our allies and ourselves. Obama gave the Iranians access to billions of dollars, so they could continue funding terrorist organizations who had stated it is their goal to destroy the United States and our allies. Obama also assisted these same enemies by maintaining an open border and allowing other terrorists to enter our country through his refugee program.
Obama limited economic growth by increasing taxes and using stifling regulations on business. He now claims it is his policies that are responsible for the economic growth he declared to be a thing of the past. It is the reversal of his policies, taxes and regulations, that has ignited the economic growth he said could never be achieved again.
Obama and Holder are directly responsible for the racial hatred in the United States today. They gave legitimacy to such anti-social groups as Black Lives Matter. Obama and Holder, mostly through deceit, fostered the hatred toward law enforcement. It was Obama and Holder that insinuated that Americans, especially patriotic Americans, are racist.
Obama is a very dangerous person. Many of his supporters refuse to research his Marxist and Islamic Jihadist ties and leanings. Many of his supporters have the same Marxist and Islamic Jihadist leanings. Obama is anti-American. He advocates for the exact opposite of what was the basis for the American Revolution and our American principles, principles based on the teachings of John Locke. Obama advocates for the principles of the French Revolution, or those principles put forth by Rosseau and Hobbs.
I challenge you to research and understand my above paragraph or you can wait a few months and read my next book that will explain that paragraph.
LEST WE FORGET
I was in a hotel in Gainesville, Florida the morning of September 11, 2001 watching the morning news. The story was that a plane had flown into one of the towers of the World Trade Center and nobody was sure if this was intentional or some form of an accident. While the discussion was taking place, you could see flames coming from the tower. While watching the flames and listening to the discussion, we who were watching, saw another plane fly into the other tower. No longer was the discussion questioning the accident idea, but the discussion was now who orchestrated the attack.
Within a short period we were informed that all planes had been ordered to land. We also learned that there were at least two other planes that were presumably hijacked and now the speculation was what were their targets. We learned that one of the targets was the Pentagon. The other plane crashed in Pennsylvania. The United States had been attacked and all planes were grounded.
I remember finally getting on a plane several days later. My route home took me through Atlanta and then into Los Angeles. I had been through Atlanta many times before. Never had I seen the airport so empty. Our plane seemed to be the only plane landing at the time. When we landed in Los Angeles it was the same situation, empty runways and empty airports.
As events unfolded we learned that the United States had been attacked by a known enemy. That same enemy had try to take down the World Trade Center about eight years earlier. When the people were caught who had attempted the bombing, America considered these war criminals to be civilian criminals and the individuals were tried in our courts and they were granted all the constitutional protections an American citizen would be given.
These same people have declared war on the United States and all peoples living in nations that do not adhere to their Islamic dictates. These same people have perpetrated attacks through out the United States and other non-Islamic nations. Still today, Islamic Jihadists are welcomed into non-Islamic countries, given benefits as if they were citizens, and continue to attack our western civilization while refusing to assimilate. We have been told that these terrorists are not happy because we do not love them enough.
These Islamic Jihadists are not necessarily unhappy. They hate anything and everything that is non-Islamic. It is there sworn duty to destroy us and put all people under Islamic control. Any individual who refuses will be killed. This is what they believe and what their children are taught.
That morning 17 years ago proved to me the Islamic Jihadist is serious about their threats and their claims. We are seeing the results through out the world, most predominantly in Western Europe. Yet, foolish people defend these people and still believe we must love them more, so they will denounce their evil ways and their hate. The more we defend them the more they will destroy us.
This is reality. We know attacks are being planned on a continuous basis. War has been declared. Those of us who understand the danger of Islamic Jihadists are being called the enemy. Those who bury their heads in the sand are guilty of aiding the enemy. History shows those who advocate the policies being advocated by the left today; that is to defend and encourage the enemy in hope that the enemy will recognize the love and change their declared intentions and goals, have always been proven to be wrong. We must learn from history and fight this war with determination, otherwise we will be fighting to escape from Sharia Law as the Law of the land.
THE EPITOME OF DOUBLE STANDARD
The left has always gone by their number one criterion of “The ends always justify the means.” Remember the way they treated Justice Bork and Justice Thomas. Remember when Harry Reid knowingly went onto the Senate floor saying that he had it from good sources that Mitt Romney had not filed income taxes for ten years. A few years later when it was common knowledge that Reid had knowingly lied, he defended his lie by saying, “he wasn’t elected was he.” Now we are learning that the left wants a perjury case brought against Judge Kavanaugh.
Three prominent liberal groups pushing to defeat Brett Kavanaugh’s Supreme Court nomination on Friday urged their fellow Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) to seek a formal perjury investigation of him based on his testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee this week. Demand Justice, MoveOn, and NARAL Pro-Choice America outlined their case in a letter sent as Kavanaugh’s marathon four-day hearing came to a close, with the Republican Senate still expected to confirm him by month’s end.
The trio of advocacy groups claim that five topics Kavanaugh addressed with Judiciary panel senators this week reveal inconsistencies with statements he made during confirmation hearings for his current appellate court position that “appear to rise to the level of perjury,” they wrote. The five topics are: Kavanaugh’s involvement in the judicial nominations of William Pryor and Charles Pickering during his time in the George W. Bush administration; his involvement in the Bush administration’s warrantless wiretapping program; his role in handling Bush-era detainee policy; and his awareness of the use of Democratic documents reportedly stolen by another GOP aide.
Kavanaugh was pressed to explain his past statements to the Senate during this week’s confirmation hearing and sought to clarify his past portrayals. When asked about the conservative Pryor, for instance, the 53-year-old appellate judge said during his previous confirmation hearing that he was not involved in handling the nomination during his service in Bush’s White House.
It is clear there is no perjury what so ever, but as we have learned facts do not matter to the left.
The double standard comes in because there was absolutely no urging by anybody on the left to investigate clear perjury with Holder, Brennan, Clapper, Lois Lerner, Koskinen, or John Kerry and the other representatives from the Obama regime when testifying on the Iran agreement. In every one of these situations, the facts show that what these people said during testimony was not only contrary to the facts, but there is good reason to believe the misinformation given was intentionally given to mislead.
In order for our Republic to survive as a free and independent nation, it is critical that honorable people serve in government positions. What has become all to obvious is that the left does not want our Republic to survive. The left does not want our nation to remain a free and independent people who make decisions for themselves in how they will live their lives, how they will think. The left wants the government to dictate to all us how we are to live our lives, how we are to think. The left wants a society that totally conforms to their ideas and thoughts. This is not the American way, despite the left claiming it is. The left fulfills totally their mode of operation, “the ends always justify the means.” Nothing is to outrageous for them including distorting of facts, double standards, manufacturing of facts, and outright deceit and lying.
AMERICANS HAVE REASON FOR CONCERN
If you listened to the Kavanaugh hearings, you must also have the same concerns I have. The future of the United States is in danger. The members of the judiciary committee have employed many strategies that would never be allowed in any court such as innuendo, hearsay, and anonymous sources. Grandstanding is understandable; after all the Senators are politicians and perhaps by definition these Senators are grand standers and self-promoters.
The one attribute that we should be able to expect, even from politicians, is fairness. This has not been the case. Fairness is no longer a part of hearings conducted by elected representatives. It is entirely possible to make your political points and at the same time be fair and be respectful. This is not possible when your mode of operation is “The ends justify the means.”
We have seen fairness and respect exemplified by certain Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) members of the committee including Senator Feinstein and Senator Klobucher. Their questions were direct, fair, and framed in an understandable and coherent manner. It is difficult to criticize Senator Leahy. One can only feel sorry for him as he embarrasses not only himself and the State of Vermont, but the whole country. Leahy struggles to frame a coherent thought. He has never been accused of being close to being brilliant, but that he still holds such a powerful position in his current greatly diminished state is an embarrassment for all.
What is really frightening, is that people with the character as exhibited in these hearings, actually are elected by American people to such high positions. Senators Blumenthal, Hirono, Booker, and Harris exhibited not only unacceptable behavior for a Senator, but unacceptable behavior for any individual participating in any gathering. Blumenthal and Hirono were interested in only making inflammatory statements and accusations and had absolutely no intent of asking questions to learn anything about the nominee who will be sitting on the Supreme Court. This is shameful.
Senators Booker and Harris were also an embarrassment but fall into a different category because they are seeking the nomination to be President. Harris was totally unfair. She violated every accepted norm of civilized decorum. She also revealed how limited her intellectual capacity is, and how strictly she adheres to the Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) axiom of “the ends justify the means." That she has risen to the position she now holds reveals the truth of the saying that people are promoted until they reach their level of incompetence along with the fallacy that the American voter is wise. Of course, the State of California has become infamous for voting for people like Harris; people who despise the principles upon which the United States was founded.
Senator Booker has revealed his inability to frame any complete thought. He has revealed that he has the capacity to frame the same incomplete thought in 99 different ways. Once he gets beyond that singular thought his ideas and his ability to frame a different thought is totally void. Senator Leahy can be excused because of his advanced age. Booker does not fall into that age category, so one can only attribute that same characteristic to Booker's lack of intellectual sufficiency.
The circus we saw in these hearings, I fear, are only an indication of what is to come. What we have learned is their is an orchestrated intent to disrupt a hearing for a Supreme Court nominee when that nominee is not a part of the Marxist/Progressive movement. Judge Bork and Justice Thomas were the initial recipients of this unacceptable and uncivilized behavior.
That people of the low character and low intellect exhibited by Senators Harris and Booker could even be considered to be serious candidates for the highest office of the land is indeed frightening and reveals the level of the American voter. We were warned by our founders that a republic such as they gave us can only exist when all people pay attention to the means as well as the results is critical. Our founders told us that long standing principles and morality must continue as a part of our society for our republic to continue. Harris and Booker both have shown their total disregard for our long-standing principles enumerated in the Declaration of Independence, Constitution of the United States, and the Bill of Rights. Harris and Booker showed their disregard for morality and fair play as well.
Our founders also told us that those we elect to positions of responsibility those who reflect the general character of the population. We as the electorate must reflect seriously on what we have become. We are an electorate who have not been taught the principles upon which we were founded and thus have been easily manipulated by the Marxist/Progressive movement to disregard these principles. We as an electorate have also been easily persuaded that right and wrong do not exist and thus have elected people to office void of morality and decency. Unless we as the electorate insist on teaching the founding principles and insist on civilized decorum within our institutions of education, nothing will change.
We can begin the above process by returning Blumenthal, Hirono, Booker, and Harris to the private sector, where it is highly questionable if they could exist.
NIKE CERTAINLY HAS A RIGHT TO HIRE KAEPERNICK – THE PUBLIC HAS A RIGHT TO MAKE THEIR CHOICE
Nike is a private company. Nike can hire the people they wish to hire. The public has the right to choose as well. The public can determine if they wish to purchase Nike products for whatever reason they determine. If the public determines they do not wish to purchase Nike products because of their affiliation with Kaepernick, that is a result of a choice Nike made and Nike must live with the consequences of their decisions.
This is no different from the NFL owners determining they will allow their employees to disrespect what many Americans hold sacred. It is a choice the NFL owners have made, and they must live with the consequences of their decisions.
What I find disturbing in these incidents is the perception put forth by many of those who are praising both the NFL owners and Nike for their actions. These people would have us believe that, what I would consider to be misguided motives are in the interest of something called social injustice. Social justice and social injustice, in today’s political arena, have come to have no meaning at all. Social justice and social injustice have come to have no specific meaning just as the Constitution of the United States has come to have no meaning to the same people who tend to support the actions of the NFL owners and Nike.
I have heard naïve people explain that the actions of the NFL owners and Nike are in support of some sort of fairness and freedom. The foolishness of these assertions is that the originator of these social justice protests, Kaepernick, is an advocate for all that suppresses fairness and freedom. Kaepernick has publicly stated that he supports the proponents of those who have followed the doctrines put forth by Karl Marx. The doctrines of Karl Marx specifically denounce fairness and freedom. Marx specifically states that only one class of people should exist and all others should be eliminated. The doctrine of Marxism advocates complete and total conformity to only one way of thought.
What Kaepernick has stated as social injustice is exactly the opposite. What Kaepernick is protesting is the very system that protects his right to voice his nonconforming views. If Kaepernick was living in the type of system he openly supports, his right to voice his viewpoints would be subjected to approval by the then tyrant in control of determining what was or was not appropriate.
Those of you who advocate the same principles and policies advocated by Kaepernick must realize what in fact Kaepernick purports. He is in fact advocating that to bring about his ideas of social justice, the rights of all those who disagree with him are to be subverted. He is denouncing the very system that can only exist when all people, including himself, have the freedom to voice their ideas and opinions.
We who support the very system that allows Kaepernick his freedom, the very system the allows all people to voice their opinions even if they are not the same opinions held by Kaepernick, must understand the consequences of our choices; freedom for all. Kaepernick and his supporters must also understand the consequences of their choices; freedom for only those granted freedom so long as what they support conforms to the ideas of those granting freedoms.
ROW VS WADE IS NOT CONSTITUTIONAL LAW
When Judge Kavanaugh is asked if Roe vs Wade is the law of the land, his correct constitutional answer would be that Roe vs Wade is a ruling of the Supreme Court, but it is not law per the United States Constitution. According to the United States Constitution, a law of the land can only become so if a bill is introduced into a house of congress, passed by both houses, and then signed by the President. This never has happened with abortion.
The manner in which Roe vs Wade has been proclaimed to be law by most in the United States is the way the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) would desire all law be made in the United States; that is that we bypass the elected representatives of the people and place all law establishment and enforcement in the hands of the courts. Remember, the courts are comprised of non-elected and in many cases non-responsive individuals to the American people. We have learned that many judges have no respect for the United Constitution and in many cases, we are learning that many judges have never read the United States Constitution much less studied its formation and basis.
What has transpired over the history of our nation has been a concerted effort by the Collectivists within the United States to follow the direction of Karl Marx and eliminate long standing principles of a nation. That would mean that Marx said the principles of the Declaration of Independence, United States Constitution, and the Bill of Rights. What the Collectivists have done has declared that these documents are living documents. That means that the Collectivists are declaring that these documents can mean anything regardless of what the words say. This is a sure way to obliterate these principle as called for by Marx.
It was the intent of the founders that we have three federal branches of government who were independent but not equal. The legislative branch was always to be the most powerful branch of government because it was the closest to the people, and the judicial branch was to be the weakest of the branches because it was the most removed from the people. Just the opposite has happened with the judicial branch becoming the most powerful. This has happened because the legislative branch has abdicated its position and responsibility while the judicial branch has usurped the Constitutional role of the legislative branch as exemplified in Roe vs Wade.
Our founders understood why the divestiture of power was so critical to a free and independent people. The founders understood that as power is consolidated, as has happened within the judicial branch, a nation becomes closer and closer to succumbing to tyranny. This is happening. Our founders told us that our government might last a long time so long as the separation of power was maintained between the branches of government.
This is the predominant reason the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) have embraced having the Constitution become a living document enabling the branch of government which is most removed from the people to become the most powerful. The critical result of the United States being fundamentally transformed is that the Untied States become a Marxist tyrannical state.
The opposition to Judge Kavanaugh by the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) is their open opposition to the principles of the Constitution of the United States. Judge Kavanaugh believes the United States Constitution was not intended to be a living document. The founders incorporated a method to change the Constitution. It is called the amendment process. It is not a judicial branch of government deciding it can pass law such as it did with Roe vs Wade.
THE WINDS ARE CHANGING IN EUROPE
Europe, under the European Union, the money of George Soros, and the misguided leadership of Merkel, has opened its borders and said come one come all. Who has come are those who wish to take advantage of the generous and misguided welfare systems of many European nations and those who wish to destroy European culture and replace it with the destructive and hateful teachings of Islam. European nations have been told by the European Union who and how many of these immigrants they must accept even though those they have accepted refuse to assimilate into the individual cultures, but instead chose to establish no go zones where Sharia law is enforced, where native women are told they must accept being sexually abused including being raped, and violence and murder are being accepted as the new norm.
There has been backlash against these Soros funded efforts to destroy European civilization in Hungary, Poland, Austria, Italy, and many of the Baltic states. Now we are seeing that same backlash in the typically anything goes nation of Sweden and the Czech Republic.
The realistic element of Sweden is expected to soar in Sweden’s September 9 general election, capitalizing on voter discontent as Swedes punish traditional parties over immigration, integration and health care. Prime Minister Stefan Lofven’s Social Democrats, who have dominated Swedish politics since the 1930s, will remain the biggest party in the country but likely with a record low score, polls suggest. The realistic Sweden Democrats (SD) are heading to make the most gains and come in a close second, followed by the conservative Moderates.
Czech prime minister Andrej Babiš has condemned the past approach of Merkel’s Germany and the European Union to illegal immigration, branding it a “threat to European civilisation”. He said on national television: “We do not want to live here in Africa or the Middle East. We have to stop [immigration from these places].” He predicted that if immigration was not brought under control, public anger and disillusionment would grow, warning “Chemnitz is around the corner” — a reference to the large-scale public protests against Germany’s migrant policy following the fatal stabbing of a local man, allegedly by a Syrian and an Iraqi with a string of previous convictions.
If American citizens will take the time and make the effort to learn what open borders have done and are doing in Europe, they would want to close our borders, so we would know who is entering our country through the process of legal immigration. Marx understood the necessity of having not just open borders but in fact no borders as advocated by Soros, the European Union, and the Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) Party here in the United States. They all understand that in order to bring about the collectivist society they grave, a totally conforming and totally equal society socially, politically, and economically where only the elite are the haves, they must destroy current societies. Open borders are a necessary tool in this quest.
The United States is a part of the same threat now being fought by so many who have suffered under this false mantra of multi-culturalism and tolerance that is really a mirage for the destruction of a society that understands and adheres to the basis of Natural Law. These collectivists want to destroy those societies and replace them with dictatorial states that control the lives and thoughts of all by bringing about the Marxist utopia of a state totally controlled by the “Dictatorship of the Proletariat.”
We who love freedom must learn from those in Europe who are now fighting for a civilized society and freedom.
IRAN AND ISIS TERRORISTS INTENTIONALLY AIDED BY OBAMA REGIMES IRANIAN DEAL
This will go unreported in the mainstream press, but it is a grave concern and validates that Obama and Jarrett wanted the Iranian deal, so they could release cash to the Iranian government to continue to aid terrorists including those who Obama and Jarrett knew would target the United States. Obama and Jarrett despised the United States. Both Obama and Jarrett are dedicated Marxists and Islamic Jihadist sympathizers whose goal is to destroy the United States as a free and independent nation.
Reported by Adam Kredo Washington Free Beacon
The recent arrest of two Iranian agents alleged to have been running spy operations on U.S. soil is just “the tip of the iceberg” in terms of the Islamic Republic’s efforts to conduct intelligence operations in America that could result in a terrorist attack, according to a leading lawmaker and U.S. officials who spoke to the Washington Free Beacon about the matter.
Following the arrest of two Iranian individuals charged with spying on Jewish and Israeli facilities in the California area, Rep. Peter Roskam (R., Ill.) told the Free Beacon it is likely Iran has stationed multiple regime-tied agents in the United States to conduct intelligence operations.
While the arrest of the two Iranians was met with shock in the press, Roskam said he was not surprised by the arrests, which have unearthed concrete evidence of the Islamic Republic’s efforts to foment discord across the globe, including on American soil.
“This is the tip of the iceberg,” Roskam said in an interview. “This is not a surprise and this is a result of the Iran regime getting financial support from the Obama administration in the Iran deal.”
Iran has been emboldened by the lack of international repercussions on its malevolent behavior and may have increased its intelligence operations in America in the years since the landmark nuclear deal, he said.
Iran is “acting with impunity, that deal emboldened them,” Roskam said. “This is an unmasking of that. Unfortunately it’s all too predictable. Give a malevolent regime huge amounts of cash with no restraining influence and this is what happens.”
The Trump Justice Department announced last week it had arrested two Iranians and charged them with spying on behalf of the hardline regime, a discovery that has refocused attention on the Islamic Republic’s global spy operations.
Lawmakers and experts have been warning for some time that Iran has stationed what some described as “sleeper cell” agents across the United States. These agents are believed to operate with impunity and could lay the groundwork for a large-scale terror attack on American soil.
The two Iranian individuals—identified as Ahmadreza Mohammadi-Doostdar, a dual U.S.-Iranian citizen, and Majid Ghorbani, an Iranian citizen and resident of California—were formally charged by the Trump administration “with allegedly acting on behalf of the government of the Islamic Republic of Iran by conducting covert surveillance of Israeli and Jewish facilities in the United States, and collecting identifying information about American citizens and U.S. nationals who are members of the group Mujahedin-e Khalq (MEK),” an Iranian opposition group that promotes regime change in the Islamic Republic, the DOJ announced.
One U.S. official, agreeing with Roskam’s assessment, told the Free Beacon Iran has been running “vast espionage and information operations in the United States” with virtual impunity. The arrest of the two recently charged Iranians denotes a significant shift in policy that could result in the capture of more agents.
“If there’s anything that’s become obvious in the last few months, it’s that the Iranians are running vast espionage and information operations in the United States,” said the source, who could only discuss the situation on background. “The Trump administration has been warning since day one that some of the windfall Iran got from the nuclear deal has been going into malign cyber operations.”
“The propaganda network that Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube uncovered was doubling as a hacking network that had been ramping up in the last couple of years,” the source said, referring the recent uncovering of a massive social media influence campaign believed to be organized by Iran.
Sen. Marco Rubio (R., Fla.), also a vocal critic of the Iranian regime, told the Free Beacon the recent arrest of the two Iranians is cause for major concern.
“I am deeply alarmed by the Justice Department’s new indictment against alleged Iranian agents,” Rubio said. “Iran’s regime has sponsored terrorist attacks against Americans abroad and our allies, and may now be seeking to target American citizens, as well as Jewish or Israeli facilities, on U.S. soil.”
Roskam, in his comment to the Free Beacon, noted that “Iran’s malevolence” toward Israel and other countries it considers an enemy is well documented.
“What’s new here is a level of aggression against the United States and an impunity with which they’re operating,” the lawmaker said, referring to the spy operations on Jewish targets—a cornerstone of Iran’s global terror operations, particularly its 1994 bombing of a Jewish facility in Argentina that sent shockwaves through the global Jewish community.
The operations on U.S. soil are “incredibly provocative and an indication where the Iranian regime is,” Roskam said.
Iran has publicly stated multiple times over the past years that it has a vast espionage network that includes the United States. While many have dismissed these claims as posturing, Roskam said Iran should be taken at its word.
“The takeaway is we can take the Iranians at face value,” he said. “They were declarative during the Iran negotiations: They were not willing to make any commitments as it relates to their state sponsorship of terror. It’s clear they haven’t. This can’t be a surprise to anyone. It is entirely consistent with what they’ve been communicating. The surprise is the idea anyone thought they were slowing down or giving up their aggressive disposition.”
Congress will play a prominent role in investigating the matter in the months to come. This will include working with federal law enforcement to ensure Iranian agents are not able to coordinate terror attacks on Jewish or Israeli facilities.
Earlier this year, Congress heard testimony from a panel of experts of former U.S. officials about Iran’s “sleeper cell” networks in America.
Iran, through terrorists affiliated with Hezbollah, could easily launch strikes in America.
“They are as good or better at explosive devices than ISIS, they are better at assassinations and developing assassination cells,” Michael Pregent, a former intelligence officer who worked to counter Iranian influence in the region, said during the April hearing. “They’re better at targeting, better at looking at things,” and they can outsource attacks to Hezbollah.
WHY HALF OF AMERICANS PLACE PARTY OVER COUNTRY
Every American who believes in the principles of The Declaration of Independence, The Constitution of the United States, and The Bill of Rights should demand a through and impartial investigation of the Hillary Clinton email scandal and the reasons why the FBI and DOJ failed to fairly and thoroughly investigate the Steele and FISA requests. If politics and party protection are put aside, what the evidence is starting to reveal is that there was a coordinated effort to not only control the outcome of a presidential election, but also there was a deliberate effort to have a non-violent coup overthrow the very basics of our coveted tradition of peaceful transfer of power.
After two years of trying to prove that Russia and the Trump campaign colluded to affect the outcome of the election, absolutely no evidence has been found. The Mueller probe has in fact violated the rule of law and is now investigating anybody that had even a remote connection to Trump to try to validate their existence. The Mueller probe is no longer investigating a crime but are investigating individuals to try to find a crime, so they can prosecute. This is what is done in totalitarian states, not states that adhere to rule of law.
In the meantime, there is proof that many crimes were committed by Hillary Clinton while Secretary of State and that there were violations of law and violations of policies by the FBI and the DOJ should be a concern for every American who values life, liberty, and property, Natural Rights given to us by our Creator and not by government.
What we have learned is that the Chinese were stealing Hillary Clinton’s emails in real time. Every email she wrote and received was being copied and sent to the Chinese, even emails with classified information.
“When [the ICIG] did a very deep dive, they found in the actual metadata — the data which is at the header and footer of all the emails — that a copy, a ‘courtesy copy,’ was being sent to a third party and that third party was a known Chinese public company that was involved in collecting intelligence for China,” the former intelligence officer told TheDCNF.
“The [the ICIG] believe that there was some level of phishing. But once they got into the server something was embedded,” he said. “The Chinese are notorious for embedding little surprises like this.”
An FBI intelligence analyst admitted to House committees last week that bureau officials were known to leak information to the press and then use the resulting articles to help obtain surveillance warrants, according to a source with knowledge of his testimony.
Members of the Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) Party have continuously fought to investigate these serious breaches. These people do not want the seriousness of these breaches made known to the American public. They do not want these serious breaches revealed because it would damage their efforts to fundamentally transform the United States. The Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) Party despises the principles upon which our nation was founded. They denounce the ideas of liberty and Natural Rights and embrace the principles of the collectivist (communist, socialist, progressive) movement were all rights of the individual, including life, liberty, and property are under total control of government.
Two fundamental policies of this movement are steeply progressive income taxes which is paramount to the Marxist doctrine of a totally conforming and a totally equal society because it is essential for spreading the wealth from the productive to the non-productive. The other principle is that of open borders. Marx told his followers that it is essential no borders exist so the whole world can live in his classless society. What we have learned is that people who live in the classless society supported and promoted by the Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) Party will always strive to escape the tyranny and breakdown of society and the financial system that is always the product of the policies now being promoted by the Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) Party if these people are aware that freedom and liberty exists in an Individualist society. Marx said all individualist societies had to be destroyed.
The Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) Party is doing everything they can, remember they practice what every Marxist has practiced that “the ends always justify the means,” and will lie, deceive and cheat to not allow the truth of what took place during the Obama regime to destroy the very core of The Declaration of Independence, The United States Constitution, and The Bill of Rights.
“JUST TO BUSY TO BE BOTHERED” IS DESTROYING OUR FREEDOM AND LEADING US TO TYRANNY
For laughs people are asked questions about different aspects of our nations history and our government. Even college students who are protesting for their rights have no idea what lead to the American Revolution, how many branches of government we have and what are they, what was the document called that declared our independence, how many justices does the Constitution say must sit on the Supreme Court, how many justices sit on the court, who are the justices, what is their constitutional function, and what is their assumed function.
A majority of likely voters were unable to correctly name just one Supreme Court justice, according to a recent poll.
The results, according to the survey:
52 percent of voters overall were unable to name one High Court justice.
48 percent of voters overall said they could or correctly named a justice.
59 percent of voters identifying as conservatives could not name a justice.
57 percent of voters identifying as liberals correctly named a justice.
Ruth Bader Ginsburg was the most recognizable justice; she was correctly identified by 25 percent of voters, according to the survey.
The Judicial Branch has become the most powerful branch of government, even though the framers intended it to be the weakest. That is correct, the branches were never intended to be equal; independent yes but not equal. The Judicial Branch has usurped the legislative function that was given only to congress or the legislative branch. Americans mistakenly believe that rulings by the court are laws. According to the Constitution, the court can only render rulings. The court has usurped the executive branches powers by claiming the orders given by the executive are not legal because the judges also play the role of God claiming they understand the intent of the executive, ignoring the words, and override the executive. District judges are now playing the role of God as well.
The Judicial Branch of government, with the Supreme Court having the final say are destroying the very document they were supposed to protect. We are quickly becoming a Judicial Tyranny with unelected judges becoming the tyrant. And Americans can not even identify these unelected individuals. The ironic part of this story is the most recognized Justice, Ruth Bader Ginsberg, has stated that international law must be considered when making rulings and can supersede the Constitution. She also claims the Constitution is a living document, so it really does not mean what it says. The words are meaningless, so we can have the Constitution mean whatever we want. The Justices have done that and have deemed the Judicial branch of government should be the most important branch, making law, administering the law, and ruling on the law.
Americans do not deem this to be important. Our nation is on “The Road To Tyranny” and Americans are to busy with other aspects of their lives to take the time to vote wisely, voting for freedom.
MARXIST/PROGRESSIVE PARTY (DEMOCRATS) OPEN WAY FOR FIRST MEMBER OF THE DSA TO BE THEIR OFFICAL PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE
We know that the Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) Party has nominated dedicated socialists to be their candidate for president. In 2008 and 2012 they nominated a dedicated Marxist (Communist) to be their presidential candidate. But never have they nominated an individual who openly declared that they were a socialist. They came close in 2016, but the party elite were able to nominate a different very flawed candidate who, if the DOJ and FBI had not become the party police protecting their members of the party but still enforcing the laws of the United States, would have been indicted and tried for violating the National Security Laws of the United States as well as being tried for using the position of Secretary of State to enrich herself and her family.
The Marxist/Progressive Party (Democrats) have changed their rules under the leadership of socialists Perez and Ellison. Under the new rule, super-delegates – the members of Congress, DNC members and other top officials who made up about 15 percent of delegates that year – will not be allowed to vote on the first ballot at a contested national convention. This could dramatically change the nominee since most nominees today are nominated on the first ballot. The potential candidate will not have to beholding to the super delegates.
This clearly opens the way for a member of the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) to become the nominee of the Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) Party. Much of the base of the party is moving into the socialist camp, especially those would be primary election voters. Although the reality of who the party has become could be shocking to some voters, it would not change the party program much since the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) and DSA are really one and the same.
Here is the purpose of the DSA as stated in Article II of their constitution.
We are socialists because we reject an economic order based on private profit, alienated labor, gross inequalities of wealth and power, discrimination based on race, sex, sexual orientation, gender expression, disability status, age, religion, and national origin, and brutality and violence in defense of the status quo. We are socialists because we share a vision of a humane social order based on popular control of resources and production, economic planning, equitable distribution, feminism, racial equality and non-oppressive relationships. We are socialists because we are developing a concrete strategy for achieving that vision, for building a majority movement that will make democratic socialism a reality in America. We believe that such a strategy must acknowledge the class structure of American society and that this class structure means that there is a basic conflict of interest between those sectors with enormous economic power and the vast majority of the population.
As you can read, this purpose is also the purpose of the Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) Party. To have their nominee also be a member of the DSA would not be any change in policy, but the public acknowledgement could have a major impact on the eventual outcome. No longer would the candidate have to try to convince the public they were really capitalists while at the same time declaring to Joe the Plumber that if he is successful he will be punished because it will then be his obligation to pay much higher taxes so the results of his hard work and success could be shared with those that the candidate deems to need it more than does Joe the Plumber.
Now the candidate could openly campaign on the socialist agenda of both the Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) party and the DSA. Even 20 years ago this would have been certain death for any political party in the United States. However, that might not be the case today. The indoctrination program of the socialists in the public schools along with the brainwashing being done through our main stream press has been ongoing and seemingly successful. We could be on “The Road To Tyranny, Individualism to Collectivism.” Freedom Loving Americans, this is a call for you to understand that the rights endowed to us by our Creator are under serious attack. You must thoroughly educate yourself on what is collectivism, the evils of collectivism, and the certain devastation socially and financially that is always the result of collectivism. Than you must, as Sam Adams said, “set brush fires of freedom in the minds of men.”
ONLY SAINTS DIE
I will periodically read the obituary section in the paper. I do it because it reinforces that only saints die. The individual was always the most loved most wonderful family member who loved people and brought happiness to those with whom they came into contact. I believe we can learn about the person the saint really was, the principles they held regardless of what they said, and who could really count on that person when they were really needed. I also believe that in all situations respect should be paid to the family who we know are grieving.
John McCain lost his battle to brain cancer. According to the obituaries he was indeed a saint. His friends are paying him great and, we should assume honest tributes. These tributes tell us a great deal as to the principles McCain really held.
Here are some examples of what his true friends said:
“He really understood in the marrow of his bones what it meant to be an American,” Hillary Clinton said.
Dick Durbin paid tribute to what he called McCain’s “uncommon decency.”
“I think we could do with this kind of approach to politics and we’d do well to remember John McCain and his legacy as we go forward,” Jeff Flake said.
Shortly after the announcement of McCain’s death, Chuck Schumer announced his intentions to propose a resolution that would rename the Senate’s Russell office building after McCain.
Nancy Pelosi said that Schumer’s proposal “would be a great tribute.”
Obama said that despite their differences, McCain and he shared a “fidelity to something higher – the ideals for which generations of Americans and immigrants alike have fought, marched, and sacrificed.”
Obama said they “saw our political battles, even, as a privilege, something noble, an opportunity to serve as stewards of those high ideals at home, and to advance them around the world.”
PEACEFUL TRANSFER OF POWER IS NOW UNDER ATTACK
When George Washington won the first presidential election and was inaugurated to become the President of the Untied States, it was done peacefully. There had been a call for Washington to assume the roll of a monarch and he rejected, even a monarch without hereditary succession. The transfer of power from John Adams to Thomas Jefferson was a peaceful transfer even after a very bitter campaign in which ridiculous and slanderous accusations were made. John Adams set a standard that had been followed by all others not elected or leaving the White House until 2016.
This peaceful transfer of power set a standard to which the rest of the world would aspire. It is now an accepted concept throughout Europe and even becoming so in parts of Asia. It has not become accepted throughout most of Africa as of yet. The concept of a peaceful transfer of power is now under attack in the United States, the nation that brought the concept to the rest of the world.
Peaceful transfer of power requires that the political elements within the country have common goals, such as the protection of freedom and independence that the United States has had over the course of our history. The political elements with the United States no longer have the preservation of individual rights above the rights of the state, that is freedom and independence of the people, which is required for a free and independent society. One of the political factions within the United States still holds the rights of the individual as Natural Rights granted by the Creator, a power that exceeds the power of the state, while the other element believes all rights are under the purview of the state.
I write about this difference in “The Road To Tyranny, Individualism to Collectivism.” Collectivism believes the people are servants of the state while Individualism believes the state is a servant of the people. These two concepts are colliding in the United States today and this collision is threatening all principles necessary to freedom including the peaceful transfer of power and the rule of law.
The collectivists, (communists, socialists, progressives) have played by a different set of standards throughout their history. The Collectivist has always lived by the axiom, “the ends justify the means.” The desired end of the collectivist is a society controlled by the state with the individual dependent upon and subservient to the almighty state; as Marx and Lenin believed and advocated, the state is god.
Many things changed in the United States recently that has brought about this open denunciation of the traditions so unique to the United States; the peaceful transfer of power and adherence to rule of law as opposed to arbitrary law where the law is changed simply by saying it has and where the law is applied differently depending on the political goals of the so-called perpetrator. The people of the United States elected a dedicated and determined communist (Marxist) to be president. This Communist believes in strict adherence to all the collectivist ideology is. This communist changed the bureaucracy into a communist style bureaucracy that believes in all that is arbitrary law including changing the law as needed by sampling restating it to mean what you need at the time and applying the law differently to people depending on their political goals and their allegiance to the collectivist ideology. This communist elected to be president also transferred the law enforcement arms of the federal government such as the DOJ, FBI, and CIA to become arms of a political party as opposed to enforcing the law of the United States under the concept of rule of law; applying the law as written and applying it uniformly regardless of social, economic, or political status of the person under investigation.
This political faction will do anything they need to do to bring about their end goal of negating The Declaration of Independence, The Constitution of the United States, The Bill of Rights, the peaceful transfer of power, the rule of law, and the abolition of all the rights of the individual as endowed to us by our Creator, to bring about their desired end of collectivism or supremacy of the state. This political faction believes anything said, anything done, and the destruction of any individual is justified so long as their goal is achieved.
Freedom, peaceful transfer of power, rule of law, and all that has made the United States a unique and great nation, are the very things that must be destroyed for the collectivists to achieve their goals. The communist that occupied the White House from 2009 to 2017 will, along with his comrades, do whatever is necessary to bring about the coup they are currently orchestrating. They have become even more vicious since their plans were so rudely interrupted by the American people in November of 2016.
MARXIST/PROGRESSIVES (DEMOCRATS) ACCESSORY TO ANOTHER MURDER
Another criminal the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) insist on protecting murdered another American citizen. An innocent young American woman, simply jogging and minding her own business, was murdered by a criminal the Marxist/Progressives protect, even knowing they are protecting this criminal while endangering the lives of peaceful citizens. The Marxist/Progressives have their reasons for their actions. They are fully aware the odds of the criminal voting for them are extremely high while the odds of the young women in Iowa voting for them are perhaps at best 50%. Consequently, the value of the young woman’s life has far less value to the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) than does the protection of the criminal.
Anyone who breaks the law is a criminal, even if the crime is just not paying a speeding ticket. It is against the law to be in the United States if you have not followed the laws of entrance. Illegal aliens are by definition a criminal.
Aiding or contributing in a secondary way or assisting in or contributing to as a subordinate.
In Criminal Law, contributing to or aiding in the commission of a crime. One who, without being present at the commission of an offense, becomes guilty of such offense, not as a chief actor, but as a participant, as by command, advice, instigation, or concealment; either before or after the fact or commission.
If an individual favors policy that enables people to enter the United States without following the rules of entrance, they must be considered to be accessories to any crime committed by these illegal aliens including the murder of Mollie Tibbetts. This would include fighting or preventing policies that protect our borders from those who would enter illegally. This would include fighting or preventing policies that would enable these criminals to remain in the United States. This would include providing protection to these criminals through such methods as providing any form of sanctuary to them or detracting law enforcement from caring out their duties.
Marxists/Progressives (Democrats) clearly fall into the definition of being an accessory to crimes committed by illegal aliens. Paul Ryan, Kevin McCarthy, Mitch McConnell, and other members of the Republican establishment would also have to be included in the category of accessory. Even though the Republican establishment gives lip service to stronger borders and removal of these criminals, their actions support the policies advocated by the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats). It is congress that must provide the money for a wall. It is congress that must pass stricter immigration laws. Congress is controlled by the Republican establishment.
It is the Republican establishment that always has a reason why they cannot act to protect American citizens from these criminals at this time. It is the Republican establishment that also tries to convince the American public that those who are in the United States illegally are not really criminals. By this reasoning, the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) and the Republican establishment are stating that not only do they want to continue to be accessories to these crimes committed by these criminals they are protecting, they are also saying they do not support rule of law but choose to apply arbitrary law, which is how law is applied by tyrannical states.
Rule of law includes applying the law to all who have broken the law, even if the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) and Republican establishment determine the individual is basically a good person. Applying this type of subjectivity to the application of the law, is arbitrary law; this is the dictatorial government saying because I determine you are a good person it is okay if you break the law, but because I determine you are a bad person, you will be held responsible for your criminal activity.
Until the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats), and yes we must include the Republican establishment, determine they will no longer support this criminal activity of entering or remaining in the United States against our written law, they will be held responsible, as accessories, for all other criminal activity committed by these illegals, including the murder of Mollie Tibbetts.
EUROPEAN UNION BRINGING ABOUT ITS OWN DEMISE
First it was the UK with Brexit and now we are hearing Sweden calling for Swexit. The European Union has become a dictator of former independent states, and many of these states are saying enough is enough. The forced refugee immigration policies have brought open rebellion in many states including Hungary, Poland, Austria, Italy, and others. The forced refugee immigration policies have brought about terrible domestic unrest in France, Germany, Belgium, Sweden, Norway, to name a few.
Brexit has become the example to follow for Sweden Democrats (SD)’s leader Jimmie Åkesson, who urged Swedish MPs to give citizens a chance to express how they feel towards Europe. Speaking to a local newspaper he called the EU a “large web of corruption” and said in the bloc, “no one has control over anything”. Arguing Stockholm should get back control of its sovereignty and funds, he added: "We pay an enormous amount of money and get overwhelmingly little back. “But the main reason is ideological: we should not be in an ideological union."
Jimmie Åkesson also said the budget black hole left by Brexit will force Sweden to further disbursements. This is not the first time a Swedish political leader called for an EU referendum. Peter Lundgren, MEP for Sweden and leading member of the SD, predicted the exit of the European Union for Sweden after Brexit one year ago.
The relentless stream of Muslim migrants to Europe, sanctioned and demanded by the EU, has combined with economic troubles and rising fear of Islamic radicalism to fuel a backlash against these Muslims who refuse to assimilate into the different cultures but instead insist on setting up their own no go enclaves under Sharia law and not the law of the individual country.
The simmering resentments and suspicions have driven debates across Europe about tighter controls on this forced immigration. Worries about Muslim immigration have helped buoy concerned parties throughout Europe, including Sweden. There are few places where the turn against immigrants is more surprising than Sweden.
The anti-European Union sentiment seems to be growing as the European Union as different individual governments punish the natives of the different countries in favor of the politically correct appeasement of Islamic Jihad terrorism and crime. The United Kingdom started the exit movement from the European Union that is threatening to become an avalanche.
YES, RAHM EMANUEL IS RIGHT BUT HAS BEEN ROUNDLY CRITICIZED BY HIS FELLOW MARXIST/PROGRESSIVES (DEMOCRATS)
Chicago has become a war zone. Two dozen people were shot in a span of 12 hours to start the weekend in Chicago. In one weekend in Chicago, 66 people were shot, including 12 who died, police say. From Friday afternoon to early Monday, 21 people were wounded, and two people were killed, including a 14-year-old boy who was shot early Saturday while walking in the Washington Park neighborhood, according to police. Weekend toll in Chicago: 6 dead, 22 wounded. At least 72 shot, 13 killed in Chicago over violent summer weekend, police department says. These were all different week-ends in Chicago, a city with some of the most restrictive gun laws in the country.
The black on black crime, which this is, is never discussed in polite leftist conversations. The reasons for this type of activity, not only in Chicago, but also in inner cities across the country including Baltimore, Washington DC, Los Angeles, and Oakland is buried in the mainstream media if mentioned at all.
Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel blamed the city's massive crime problem on a "shortage of values." Mr. Emanuel called on residents to "be a neighbor" and step forward if they knew anything about the perpetrators.
Emanuel is being criticized for saying that a lack of morals in some communities is to blame for the escalating violence rocking the city this summer.
“This may not be politically correct," he said, "but I know the power of what faith and family can do. … Our kids need that structure. … I am asking … that we also don’t shy away from a full discussion about the importance of family and faith helping to develop and nurture character, self-respect, a value system and a moral compass that allows kids to know good from bad and right from wrong.”
He added: “If we’re going to solve this … we’ve got to have a real discussion. … Parts of the conversation cannot be off-limits because it’s not politically comfortable. … We are going to discuss issues that have been taboo in years past because they are part of the solution. … We also have a responsibility to help nurture character. It plays a role. Our kids need that moral structure in their lives. And we cannot be scared to have this conversation.”
Emanuel also raised hackles by tackling the idea of a "moral community."
“Everybody is pointing at somebody. The criminal, the criminal activity, the gang have to be raised, not just ‘what did the police do?’” Emanuel said then. “Legitimate questions, but not in lieu of another set of questions, not in lieu of asking where is the individual or the gang or the culture who condones rather than condemns?”
The mayor continued to say that the “question of what a moral community is” needed to be addressed, along with questioning his decisions and the policies of the Police Department. Mayoral challenger Lori Lightfoot, whom Emanuel appointed to two city policing panels, has criticized the mayor’s remarks as a form of “victim shaming.”
The Chicago Mayor showed a great deal of courage in saying what he did, but he should have continued with his discussion and explained that what he addressed is a direct result of the so called “war on crime” which brought about the permanent welfare system that has made slaves of many inner city inhabitants, to the state. This is exactly what happens when the Marxist mentality of “from each according to his abilities to each according to his needs” is employed.
A permanent welfare system destroys the family, it destroys respect people had for themselves and for others. It brings about fatherless families. It creates a breeding mentality for the purpose of increasing welfare payments. It creates a criminal and gang infested community. A permanent welfare system has been created and endorsed by the Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) Party because it creates a permanent voting block; a group of people who are now slaves to the state.
Emanuel discussed the results of a system for which he has been a strong supporter. He did not discuss the reason for the break down of different communities within his city. The Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) are dealing with the inevitable results of the society they have purposefully created for the sole purpose of power, so they can fundamentally transform the United States into a Marxist tyrannical state. Their solution to solve the problem will be a bigger welfare state and a bigger and even more dictatorial bureaucratic state. It did not work in the Soviet Union, Cuba, or Venezuela and it will not work here.
YES, ELECTION FRAUD IS THRIVING AND PROMOTED BY MARXIST/PROGRESSIVES (DEMOCRATS)
Some 3.5 million more people are registered to vote in the U.S. than are alive among America’s adult citizens. Such staggering inaccuracy is an engraved invitation to voter fraud.
That’s enough over-registered voters to populate a ghost-state about the size of Connecticut.
A sample of 462 counties exhibit this ghost-voter problem. These range from 101 percent registration in Delaware’s New Castle County to New Mexico’s Harding County, where there are 62 percent more registered voters than living, breathing adult citizens — or a 162 percent registration rate.
Washington’s Clark County is worrisome, given its 154 percent registration rate. This includes 166,811 ghost voters. Georgia’s Fulton County seems less nettlesome at 108 percent registration, except for the number of Greater Atlantans, 53,172, who compose that figure.
But California’s San Diego County earns the enchilada grande. Its 138 percent registration translates into 810,966 ghost voters. Los Angeles County’s 112 percent rate equals 707,475 over-registrations. Beyond the official data, there are credible reports that in LA County the total number of registered voters now stands at a number that is a whopping 144 percent of the total number of resident citizens of voting age.
All told, California is a veritable haunted house, teeming with 1,736,556 ghost voters. California’s voting rolls are an absolute mess that undermines the very idea of clean elections. t is urgent that California take reasonable steps to clean up its rolls, but given the current political climate in Sacramento, this will not happen.
How does this happen and why is it such a serious problem? It is a serious problem because in the vast majority of states, the voter does not have to prove that they are who they say they are. What has happened on a regular basis is the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) will bus people into different counties, give them names of people they know will not or cannot vote, and pay these people to cast illegal votes.
These discrepancies are deliberately created by the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) for that very purpose. A James Madison University student was recently sentenced to prison after pleading guilty to registering dead voters for the Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) Party during the 2016 election.
Andrew Spieles, 21, was given a 100-day prison sentence in federal court for falsifying 18 Virginia voter registration forms. Spieles worked as a Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) campaign operative during its voter registration drive and admitted that he prepared the false voter registration forms by obtaining the name, age, and address of individuals from “walk sheets” provided to him by the Virginia Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) Party. He fabricated a birth date based on the ages listed in the walk sheet and fabricated the social security numbers.
Always remember that the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) practice regularly and continuously the command to all Collectivists (communists, socialists, progressives, leftists,), “THE ENDS JUSTIFY THE MEANS.”
MARXIST/PROGRESSIVES AGAIN HAVE INTERNAL CONFLICT – BUT THEIR TRUE CHARACTER WILL PREVAIL
Jessie Jackson, an individual who has played loose with truth and facts over his long career of self-promotion and self-enrichment, is at odds with Nancy Pelosi. Jackson, who promoted the lie that Brown raised his arms and shouted don’t shoot while in fact Brown was charging the police office and tried to get the gun and shoot the police officer in Ferguson, is now claiming he wants to retreat to the moral center.
The Rev. Jesse Jackson says the Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) Party can triumph by "standing forcefully for what is right." What Jackson is strongly stating, and he is correct, is that he and his party have NOT stood for what is right.
"This is the time for citizens and for true leaders to move not left or right, to the expedient or the cautious, but to the moral center," Jackson said. In truth Jackson, all people, but especially those who call themselves Reverend, should always advocate for that which is moral, something in which you have failed miserably.
"That may be the final irony. The most successful political strategy may well be not to trim to prevailing opinion or compromise with entrenched interest, but to stand up forcefully for what is right, “Jackson continued. To stand forcefully for what is right should always be what we do regardless of political strategy. This is the difference between a statesman and a politician.
In a wide-ranging interview, Nancy Pelosi addressed the upcoming midterm elections and told the members of her party to “do whatever you have to do” to get elected, even if that means lying to their constituents to tell them what they want to hear.
“Now, I do believe that none of us is indispensable, but I think I’m the best person for the job and I won’t let the Republican ads, which are just … flooding these districts, and I say to the candidates ‘do whatever you have to do, just win baby,'” she stated.
“We must win this. When the caucus decides, it will decide whose name they will send to the floor, and then, and only then, after the election will I ask people for their support,” she added.
Pelosi took the standard approach the Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) Party has relied on in the past and is promoting with even more vigor today. Jackson said the party should take the road of a statesman, which would be great if they did, but since they are the party promoting socialism and all that divides, the truth of what they wish for our country would not be a winning strategy. Never forget the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) have lived by their motto of “the ends always justify the means” for years.
Pelosi’s approach will once again prevail, and Jackson has already moved back in lock step with his party. After all that is who he is, a self-promoter and self-en richer who will do and say anything he needs to say to promote himself and achieve his power and monetary goals. After all, Jackson, as is Pelosi, a Marxist/Progressive (Democrat).
THIS IS THE RESULT OF OPEN IMMIGRATION IN A ONCE PEACEFUL SWEDEN
Gothenburg police and fire services were alerted to the first blaze after 9pm, after which several more calls came in from the city as well as Trollhättan, Lysekil and Falkenberg some 100 kilometres away.
"We have been to around 20 places in Gothenburg. It's mainly vehicles that have burned – cars, some truck, caravans – but also some buried waste disposal site," Johan Eklund, emergency control room officer in the greater Gothenburg area, told Swedish news agency TT shortly after midnight.
Swedish media reported that groups of up to ten youths had been seen throwing stones and lighting cars on fire in Gothenburg districts Gårdsten, Hjällbo and Frölunda, among other locations.
Videos sent to The Local showed masked people dressed in black torching cars.
One witness, who asked to be named only as Robert, told The Local he had seen a group of half a dozen people torch cars in the car park outside his home in Frölunda. His wife called the emergency services.
"We were very surprised. This area is usually very calm. Nothing like this has ever happened before. Six months ago, it happened on the other side of the square. We've been living here for eight years," he said.
"They acted like a team, absolutely. It was organized. They know exactly what they were going to do."
In Trollhättan, 70 kilometres north of Gothenburg, a larger group of people was reportedly involved, wrote TT. Six cars burned in the town and youths were reported throwing stones at police.
Gothenburg police said on Tuesday morning they believed the attacks had been coordinated on social media but added that they were still investigating and were not yet able to confirm that that was the case.
In total around 80 cars were set on fire across the region, said Gothenburg police.
Police said they had managed to identify several people believed to have been present at the scene of some of the fires. Just after noon on Tuesday they said two people, residents of Frölunda and aged 16 and 21, were being held in connection with the fires. They were later formally arrested on suspicion of aggravated arson.
Car burnings were also reported to a smaller extent in Malmö and Helsingborg. Southern police spokesperson Fredrik Bratt told TT it was "not completely out of the ordinary" and added he did not believe they were linked to the Gothenburg fires, but said they were monitoring the situation.
Around a dozen cars also burned in Stockholm, Uppsala and Åkersberga on Monday night, wrote the Expressen tabloid. There were no other reports of riots or violence in those areas, it added.
Other European nations such as Norway, Belgium, France, Germany, and the UK are also under constant attacks. These once peaceful nations are now under constant attack traced to their open immigration policies forced by the EU as well. Sweden is not the exception but the norm.
DEMOCRATS OFFICIALLY BECOME MARXIST/PROGRESSIVE PARTY
Nancy Pelosi was asked in what the Democrats believe.
“There are a lot of people out there, particularly Democrats, who are saying the Democrats have no message, the Democrats they don’t know what they’re for, they know they’re against President Trump, but they don’t know what they’re for,” said the interviewer
Harsh, but ultimately true. Aside from the overarching disdain for Trump, there seems to be little else keeping a fractured Democratic leadership together.
“Democrats are for the people. Democrats are for the people,” Pelosi responded, as if saying it twice makes it more true.
Of course, that’s a response that a well-trained parrot could give. Pelosi stumbled and struggled over her next few words.
“It means we are for the people having lower health care costs, reducing the costs of prescription drugs. Democrats are for bigger paychecks by building the infrastructure of America, creating good paying jobs.”
This is from the Constitution of the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA):
We are socialists because we reject an economic order based on private profit, alienated labor, gross inequalities of wealth and power, discrimination based on race, sex, sexual orientation, gender expression, disability status, age, religion, and national origin, and brutality and violence in defense of the status quo. We are socialists because we share a vision of a humane social order based on popular control of resources and production, economic planning, equitable distribution, feminism, racial equality and non-oppressive relationships. We are socialists because we are developing a concrete strategy for achieving that vision, for building a majority movement that will make democratic socialism a reality in America. We believe that such a strategy must acknowledge the class structure of American society and that this class structure means that there is a basic conflict of interest between those sectors with enormous economic power and the vast majority of the population.
The purpose of the Democrats is stated more eloquently in the Constitution of the DSA than how Pelosi stated it, but then that is not surprising, and perhaps the interview with Pelosi was done after the lunch hour.
Gallup reported that “Democrats have a more positive image of socialism than they do of capitalism” for the first time since Gallup began polling that question over the past decade. This is supported by the call for socialist programs of all elements of the party.
Open borders protesters and members of the Democrat Party and George Soros supported group Antifa chanted death to America during a counter-protest in Washington, DC, on Sunday.
In a video these members of the Democrat Party who also support open borders, can be heard and seen marching down streets throughout Washington, DC, demanding an end to the United States.
“No border, no wall, no USA at all!” Antifa and fellow Democrat activists chanted.
Not one member of the Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) Party has denounced BLM, or Antifa for their statements of hatred towards the United States nor their violence and attacks against the American people, the police, and the press.
What has been suspected from as early as the days of Woodrow Wilson, enhanced by the regime of Franklin Roosevelt, and solidified by the regime of Obama, is now officially known for all: The party once called the Democrats is now officially the Marxist/Progressive Party embracing all that Marx said was necessary, including violence, suppression of speech, and censorship, to bring about his classless society where all conform to communist ideals or suffer the consequences. Remember, in their world, “The ends justify the means.”
FREEDOM OF THE PRESS IS UNCONDITIONAL
The First Amendment to the Constitution of United States is critical to freedom. These freedoms are not conditional, and they are not subjective. These freedoms must be protected for all, even for those with whom we disagree.
The First Amendment says: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
It is very clear that Congress can not make any law abridging the freedom of the press. Notice, the freedom is not conditioned based on the accuracy of the story. The freedom is not conditioned based on the slant of the story, the omitting of pertinent facts, or the abusive personality of the reporter. The founders understood if freedom was conditional it was not a guaranteed freedom. A free nation cannot remain free if we condition the freedom of the press on any subjective criteria.
I was asked the other evening if I thought we would ever have an honest and objective press. My answer was that we never have had and the chances of ever having a totally factual and objective press are non-existent. Reporters and other news people are individuals with all the flaws inherent in human nature.
It is critical that we as citizens of a free nation be discerning when we are reading or listening to different news reporters and outlets. It is critical that we gather our news from several different sources and as we understand a certain source is intentionally misleading, we eliminate that source.
This concept of reporters intentionally using misleading, false, slanderous, or slanted stories is not new to American politics, any other nations politics, or world politics.
Here are a couple of examples of slanderous stories of the past. In the fourth presidential election, John Adams and Thomas Jefferson were opposing each other. Adams was the current President. Adams and Jefferson had played critical roles in the fight for our independence. They had been close friends but grew to be bitter opponents because of their differing political opinions.
Back then, presidential candidates didn't actively campaign. In fact, Adams and Jefferson spent much of the election season at their respective homes in Massachusetts and Virginia. A key difference between the two politicians was that Jefferson hired a hatchet man named James Callendar to do his smearing for him. Adams, on the other hand, considered himself above such tactics. Callendar proved incredibly effective, convincing many Americans that Adams desperately wanted to attack France. Although the claim was completely untrue, voters bought it, and Jefferson stole the election.
John Quincy Adams lost the presidency to Andrew Jackson in 1828, in a bitter campaign filled with perhaps more untruthful stories than truthful stories. The slurs flew back and forth, with John Quincy Adams being labeled a pimp, and Andrew Jackson's wife getting called a slut. As the election progressed, editorials in the American newspapers read more like bathroom graffiti than political commentary. One paper reported that "General Jackson's mother was a common prostitute, brought to this country by the British soldiers! She afterward married a mulatto man, with whom she had several children, of which number General Jackson is one!"
Jackson’s wife, Rachel Jackson, never served as first lady. She died on December 22, 1828, many say, of a broken heart from the spurious attacks against her. Andrew Jackson, who dearly loved Rachel, paid a tremendous price for his victory and entered the White House a widower.
Members of the press, politicians, and others vying for power, prestige, and wealth have and will use the critical guarantee of a free press to achieve their respective desires. Bad people have and will use what is critical for freedom to gain their selfish desires. The alternative to a free press is a censored and controlled press which is the desire and dream of all who wish to limit freedom. A censored and controlled press is one of the first goals of any desirous tyrant and is essential to their success.
No, we will never have a fair and honest press, but we must insist on always having a free press. It is critical to us remaining a free and independent people as opposed to succumbing to the promised fundamental transformation to a Marxist tyrannical state under the Dictatorship of the Proletariat.
DO NOT REMOVE
Don Jans, the author of "My Grandchildren's America", believes that America is great because of it's promises of individual freedom and opportunity. Like most grandparents, he believes his grandchildren will have the ability and desire to excel, if that opportunity is still available. Will the changes promised and happening now, limit these freedoms and opportunities?
Don has been a student of history for over 40 years. He has concentrated in the study of European history with an emphasis on Russian history. This led him to his study of Karl Marx and Marxism. In addition to being a popular speaker on Marxism, Don has also had articles published on the topic. He also has been a guest on regional and national media broadcasts.
Dec 1, 2014 Presentation with Don Jans http://www.thevillagesteaparty.org/dec-1-2014-with-don-jans.html
Dec 1, 2014 Special Interview with Don Jans
Contact info: email@example.com