"Tea Party Surges to Win Wars Waged by Democrat Lies… " www Aileen Milton, President of The Villages Tea Party ________________________
Former Marine Sergeant Hisashi Pompey is an American hero.
Marine War Hero Faces 3 Years In Prison Thanks To A New Jersey Law Posted by Allison Hillman | Apr 14, 2017 This former Marine doesn’t deserve to go to prison. Former Marine Sergeant Hisashi Pompey is an American hero. He is currently faced with 3 years in prison for violating a New Jersey law. His crime? Traveling to New Jersey with a legally owned weapon that wasn’t registered in the state. This ridiculous infraction may ruin the Sergeant’s life. The young Sergeant was visiting the state of New Jersey six years ago when this occurred. He and his wife now reside in Bowie, Maryland with their three daughters. He is a licensed gun owner. During his visit in 2011, he went to Fort Lee nightclub with some friends. At that point, he was an active Sergeant and was in uniform. He was visiting his family in New Jersey from Quantico, Virginia where he was stationed. Before meeting his friends he had been teaching a class on guns to other Marines.
He went outside to retrieve his bag from a friend’s car when another friend ran up to him, his face covered in blood from a fight. The friend grabbed the gun from Sergeant Pompey’s holster and proceeded to brandish it during a confrontation with police. No shots were fired from the weapon. However, New Jersey has some of the more strict gun laws in the country. According to liberals, that protects people from getting killed. We have overwhelming evidence to the contrary. Sergeant Pompey was charged with felony possession of an unlawful firearm. His conviction by a jury ended his career as a Marine. The friend who grabbed the gun was given a plea deal. The Sergeant had served three tours in Afghanistan and Iraq. He was in the Military Police and received several medals for his bravery. He states, “I’m not a troublemaker. I don’t cause trouble. I don’t do anything bad, it was just a common mistake that I made.”
This decorated Marine should be given respect, not prison time. Sergeant Pompey lost his last appeal in February and is scheduled to report for his punishment on April 17. For carrying a legal weapon that night and having an idiot for a friend, the decorated Marine will serve a minimum of three years. In this type of case, the judge has no discretion on sentencing so the Sergeant will serve at least the 36 months. HIs wife Stacey says, “It’s hard to process that a man who served our country, who’s almost given his life for the country, is now having to possibly go to jail for a country that he fought for.” When asked if he was ready to serve his sentence he replied, “Not really, mentally I’m trying with support, but not really.”
This man who bravely served his country is now being treated like a criminal. His wife and children are about to lose him for three years, not to war but to ineffective gun laws. The Sergeant’s only hope now rests with New Jersey Governor Chris Christie. The governor has actually been faced with this decision before. Christie pardoned Shaneen Allen in 2015. She was arrested in 2013 for having a handgun in her car while in New Jersey. Allen is a Pennsylvania resident and had a legal permit to carry the gun, which New Jersey didn’t recognize. That same year Christie also pardoned another Marine, Joshua Velez. He was arrested earlier in the year for bringing his legally owned weapon into New Jersey from Massachusetts. A largely Democratic liberal-run government has brought our country to this terrible place. Even though Americans are granted a constitutional right to carry, states are still allowed to impose strict rules that only end up punishing law-abiding citizens. These three children are about to lose their father to prison.
It has been proven time and again that criminals will get ahold of guns, no matter the law. Chicago is a whole city that makes that point. Their rigid laws have not prevented the criminals from obtaining guns and using them to kill each other and innocent citizens. Perhaps if the citizens were equally armed there wouldn’t be so many deaths. The man who walked into a San Bernadino school last week and shot his wife, two students, a teacher, and himself wasn’t legally permitted to have a gun. He has a violent history and was a convicted felon. That did not stop him from obtaining the weapon that caused so much misery. Liberals seem to be unable to recognize that criminals who shoot people don’t care what the laws say; hence the term criminals. Sergeant Pompey and his lawyer have petitioned Governor Christie for the pardon. “Only help I am asking for is from the Governor, that’s the only one, everyone from judges to lawyers say the only person who will help me now is the governor.” The governor has yet to respond but Sergeant Pompey’s lawyer says he hopes Governor Christie will listen and not let the young man’s life be ruined. “He goes into state’s prison next week where he will do 3 years minimum, before he could even get parole. This is a man who has done two tours in Afghanistan, a tour in Iraq. The only hope is for Governor Christie to exercise his power of pardon. Governor Christie in the past has stepped up and helped worthy individuals and it’s my hope and prayer that he does the same for Sergeant Pompey.” We can only hope that Governor Christie comes to his senses and helps this hero avoid prison. On a larger scale, with a right leaning government in place, there is hope for the 2nd Amendment once again. Carry conceal laws need to be uniform. If someone is licensed to have a gun in one state, another should not be allowed to randomly impose stricter laws on them. ____________________________
This is stunningly interesting and hopefully will be picked up by MSM and congressional investigators. Sometimes when a person is deep inside an echo-chamber of like-minded ideologues, they might not realize what they’re saying is rather revealing to those on the outside. That’s the set up for former Obama administration official Evelyn Farkas (Deputy Asst. Secretary of Defense) appearing on MSNBC and admitting first hand knowledge the Obama administration spied on candidate and president-elect Donald Trump’s transition team to gather “intelligence” for political use. It would appear Ms. Farkas was so caught up in the discussion, she didn’t quite realize the significant admissions she was making about the Obama administration spying on Donald Trump’s team and generating classified intelligence for Ms. Farkas (and others) to spread to Capitol Hill politicians. MSNBC’s Mika Brzezinski recognized the ‘oh-snap’ admission and tried to play it off,… but by then it was too late. I was urging my former colleagues, and, and frankly speaking the people on the Hill [Democrat politicians], it was more actually aimed at telling the Hill people, get as much information as you can – get as much intelligence as you can – before President Obama leaves the administration. Because I had a fear that somehow that information would disappear with the senior [Obama] people who left; so it would be hidden away in the bureaucracy, um, that the Trump folks – if they found out HOW we knew what we knew about their, the Trump staff, dealing with Russians – that they would try to compromise those sources and methods; meaning we no longer have access to that intelligence. So I became very worried because not enough was coming out into the open and I knew that there was more. We have very good intelligence on Russia; so then I had talked to some of my former colleagues and I knew that they were also trying to help get information to [Democrat politicians]. But wait, it didn’t just stop there. It gets worse – or better, depending on your position.
With the help of MSNBC, simultaneous to her admission of first-hand specific knowledge of the administration spying on Mr. Trump, Ms. Evelyn Farkas outs herself as the key source for a New York Times report which discussed President Obama officials leaking classified information to media. Considerable irony jumps to the forefront when you recognize, the New York Times tried to protect Evelyn Farkas as the source of their reporting by stating: “More than a half-dozen current and former officials described various aspects of the effort to preserve and distribute the intelligence, and some said they were speaking to draw attention to the material and ensure proper investigation by Congress. All spoke on the condition of anonymity because they were discussing classified information, nearly all of which remains secret.” (link) D’oh. Whoopsie. Looks like Devin Nunes and the House Intelligence Committee has a new person to bring in for testimony. A positive development because at this rate the media leakers will out themselves without much need for investigation. I wonder what the criminal penalties are for having access to intelligence and sharing it with Democrat politicians [“The Hill People”]. Question #1: Who, specifically, are these “Hill People” you speak of Mrs. Farkas?Watch again. Longer version – key moment at 04:50 [prompted] Just hit play:
UPDATE: The plot thickens:♦ Evelyn Farkas has stated freely on TV that she and a group of associates from the Obama Administration went to congressional staffers who did not have access to these COMINT products and urged them to seek to gain access to them. At some point in the recent past Farkas was de-briefed (cut off) from access to the various kinds of compartmented information she had been given as a requirement of her prior job. When that occurred she signed some papers in which she accepted the responsibility to protect the secrecy of that information. (link) ♦ Evelyn Farkas is also a senior fellow of the Atlantic Council –SEE HERE– the Atlantic Council is funded in part by the US State Department, NATO, the governments of Latvia and Lithuania, the Ukrainian World Congress, and the Ukrainian oligarch Victor Pinchuk. The Atlantic Council has been among the loudest voices calling for a new Cold War with Russia And guess who else is a senior fellow of the Atlantic Council? Dimitri Alperovitch – the founder and CTO of CrowdStrike! Alperovitch is head honcho of the Atlantic Council’s “Cyber Statecraft Initiative”. ♦ CrowdStrike, aka Dimitri Alperovitch was the organization that initially claimed they had evidence the Russians were connected to the Trump organization. A claim they have subsequently walked back – SEE HERE
Combine all of these data-points and you discover that Evelyn Farkas was essentially part of a disinformation campaign with Obama insiders spreading a fake DNC constructed story using false information. However, in addition to pushing the false Trump Russian conspiracy narrative, Farkas has knowledge of the outcome of the original pushing of the narrative leading to actual surveillance of the Trump team. This bolsters the information already presented by Devin Nunes that an entirely separate network of surveillance, unrelated to the Russian conspiracy story, was directly targeting the candidacy of Trump and the post-election surveillance of the President Elect Trump-transition team. ____________________________
Fox News has fired Judge Andrew Napolitano (pictured) for exposing UK spy agencies working with Obama, according to his report.
Fox News Fires Judge Napolitano After He Proved Obama Treason Live On The Air Posted by Sam Di Gangi | Mar 21, 2017 Fox News has fired Judge Andrew Napolitano (pictured) for exposing UK spy agencies working with Obama, according to his report. One of the most popular faces on news-based TV, Judge Andrew Napolitano, is being let go by Fox News. This is happening “after disavowing his on-air claim that British intelligence officials had helped former President Barack Obama spy on Donald Trump,” according to Yahoo News. A person with knowledge of the situation who chose not to be named has said that the Judge will not be with the network any longer nor will he be in any Fox segments. It all started last week on “Fox and Friends.” He said he had three different sources showing that Obama traveled “outside the chain of command” to spy and watch President Donald Trump. The United Kingdom called the accusation “nonsense” following White House Press Secretary Sean Spicer making a reference to the report during a briefing. This all goes back to Trump uncovering that he was spied on by Barack Obama before (and perhaps after) he was elected to office. Judge Napolitano was at the White House advising about Judge Gorsuch and was rumored to be on a short list for the Supreme Court.
In what seems to be a rather common theme in JamesComey’s left leaning F.B.I, it was declared by the agency that there is no proof that Trump was spied upon or wiretapped by Obama. This is the same director that when Wikileaks exposed all of the proof about Clinton, and didn’t need much research to move ahead with her prosecution, claimed that more time was needed. Now for something that DOES need to be researched in depth, it seems that Comey can reach a conclusion in no time at all. The President has flirted with the wise idea of appointing Napolitano to the Supreme Court before. However, he has said regarding the matter, “all we did was quote a certain very talented legal mind who was the one responsible for saying that on television. I didn’t make an opinion on it. You shouldn’t be talking to me. You should be talking to Fox.” This does not mean that “America’s Judge” is forbidden from being appointed to the highest court in the land. Clearly, he is free from other contractual obligations now. The problem is that he may be seen as tarnished, and might face huge opposition to his nomination if it were to happen. Now that he has been fired from Fox, those that oppose him on the left will call this matter in to question as a way to say that he is not honest. “America’s Judge” has been on the side of the true meaning of the Constitution for a very long time. Shepard Smith at Fox News all but fell over himself trying to run from the comments. He said, “Fox News knows of no evidence of any kind that the now-president of the United States was surveilled at any time, in any way.” This is the kind of statement by both Fox and Smith that could really come back to haunt them should the Judge’s words prove true. Napolitano is not a man who has a reputation for being wrong nor dishonest in any way. For this reason, if he was right, many viewers will see Fox just as they do CNN, which is fake news. They also will not easily forgive the besmirching of Napolitano or Trump, if vindicated.
This is more than likely to happen too, considering that he had served on the New Jersey Superior Court from 1987 to 1995, and has more than a bit of experience gathered from the post to know facts when he hears them. It is not very probable that Napolitano made up the three sources, either. One source could be any crackpot, two sources would be common, but three? For him to pick three as his number, he must have really had the sources. Unfortunately for “America’s Judge,” unless the three prove brave enough to stand up for him, he could be in real trouble trying to prove this. It can not be imagined that he would ask them to out themselves. While Judge Gorsuch will likely fill the Scalia vacancy, Napolitano was on a short list to replace Ginsburg or any of the elder Supreme Court members in the future. He has been with Fox as a senior judicial analyst since 1998, so it is odd that the network would not have a bit more faith and trust placed in him by now. There is simply no feasible way that he would openly sacrifice his career and quite possibly his future on the American Supreme Court just to flirt with a lie. His motive could be to secure a place of security in Trump’s future plans for the Supreme Court, but he has already been consulted for Judge Gorsuch. His name is ALREADY on the short list for any openings. As such, he has no motive whatsoever to have stretched the truth in this report. It is far more likely that the Judge has stood by his morals and his ethics. He was most likely fired for refusing to expose who told him. He could do that, but then he would have to look into the mirror when done. Considering that so many people are murdered for bravely telling the truth, Napolitano could, in theory, be signing someone’s death sentence with such a disclosure. Beyond that, if they worked for a UK spying agency as said, these three heroes could lose their jobs, pensions and perhaps even be sent to prison for treason. If England uses the firing squad, that too could be an option since we are talking about spying agencies at the very top.
President Trump has grown irate over hacking and wiretapping that he says is coming from the left. Rather than send these sources to a life of exile as Snowden’s Russian neighbor, Napolitano can be expected to simply take the blow no matter how damaging. If he never gets to wear the black robe as he sits on the Supreme Court because of his report, he will accept it. If his future shot at that is lost then it was lost for the truth (at least the truth as he believed it to be when he said it). That is something a just judge can live with. Such a man is not driven by power or greed, so he would be (and still is) a remarkable choice for such a post. That will depend on two things, however. First, it depends on how much time passes before his name comes up when a justice retires or dies, and secondly, if Trump would still appoint him. If so, the president will see many political arrows from the Obama left flying for his head if, or when, he does. We do know that in all of these years of loyal judicial and analytical service, Judge Andrew Napolitano has been nothing but consistently correct. That means that either he suddenly decided to soil his reputation by lying about three sources in a spy story that otherwise would have passed the news cycle, or he was telling the truth. Where there is smoke, one often finds a fire. Hopefully, that burning smell is the aroma of the Judge happily torching his contract and looking onward.
Sept 29th Demand apology from Government Officials who use this description for Concerned American Citizens
Definition of a Tea bagger .. To tea bag is a slang term for the sexual act of a man placing his scrotum in the mouth of a willing sexual partner for pleasure or onto the face or head of another person. The name of the practice, when it is done in a repeated in-and-out motion, is derived from its passing resemblance to the dipping of a tea bag into a cup of hot water as a method of brewingtea. As a form of non-penetrative sex, it can be done for its own enjoyment or as foreplay. _________________________
NETANYAHU SLAPS OBAMA, PRAISES TRUMP’S ‘VERY STRONG’ LEADERSHIP. April 21, 2017 by James Barrett One prominent global leader who is particularly happy about America’s “welcome change” at the top is Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who on Friday praised Donald Trump’s “very strong” words and “forthright deeds” in response to the tyrannical regime in Syria. The PM’s comments came during a joint press conference with Defense Secretary James Mattis on Friday. During his remarks, Netanyahu made clear that he is glad to see that the policies of the Obama administration appear to have been tossed, like most of his legacy, into the dustbin of history. “We sense a great change in the direction of American policy,” said Netanyahu, the Washington Examiner reports. “We noted the very clear and forthright words, Mr. Secretary, that you had to say about Iran,” he said. “This follows very strong and forthright words on the part of President Trump, and very forthright deeds against the use of chemical weapons by Iran’s proxy, Syria.” This “welcome change” in policy and strategy, he said, is “appreciated around the world and in our region.” Netanyahu proved to be a thorn in the side of President Obama, with whom he repeatedly butted heads, particularly leading up to the infamous Iran nuclear deal, to which the Israeli government was adamantly opposed. Netanyahu really ramped up his increasingly open opposition to the Obama administration when he addressed a joint session of the U.S. Congress in March 2015 to slam the “very bad deal.” That same year, a political NGO connected to Obama’s 2008 campaign attempted to oust Netanyahu in the Israeli election using U.S. taxpayer money. The Trump administration has made clear in the last few weeks that the days of the Obama administration’s feckless “lead from behind” foreign policy are over. In just a matter of days, Trump ordered a strategic airstrike against a Syrian military base in response to yet another use of chemical weapons by the Assad regime and dropped the “Mother of All Bombs” on ISIS in Afghanistan, killing over 100 ISIS militants. Source: The Daily Wire _________________________
ALERT: Clinton Staffer Arrested For Colluding With China. What Should Happen To Them? Justice is finally being SERVED! It’s about time we got some of these crooks behind bars. Candace Marie Claiborne was officially indicted for her treasonous crimes, according to a Department of Justice press release. (via Justice.gov) She committed a slew of crimes against her country, and every single patriot who lives here.We cannot be surprised, considering she was one of Hillary’s staff members. (via YourNewsWire.com) The crimes that Claiborne was indicted on include conspiracy to defraud the U.S. government, concealing contracts with foreign spies, obstructing an official proceeding, and making a false statement to the FBI. Every single one of these crimes is considered a felony, and it looks like Candace isn’t going to be free for a long time. Essentially, she was traveling to China and disclosing top secret government documents to spies. During her time in China, she was bought with thousands of dollars in gifts, nights out, and more. This behavior is absolutely disgusting, and she should be ashamed of betraying her country this way. The reports compiled an extensive list of the things that she received as gifts. She managed to get an apartment, electronics, tuition to an unnamed fashion school, and more. In some of the information presented during the trial, a startling revelation was made. In a move lifted right from Hillary Clinton’s playbook, she told people she was working with that she deleted her emails after she found out she was busted. The prosecutors spoke at length about this situation. According to them, there are bound to be plenty of others who worked for Clinton who are going to have to face the music. At this point, Claiborne is likely going to spend the rest of her life behind bars. The report made by the Department of Justice shows, at length, what exactly happened to land Claiborne in hot water. We’ve been waiting for these people to pay for their actions for a long time. Back when Hillary was running, we knew something was up, and this only goes to confirm that suspicious. In time, we’ll likely see the fall of many others within the Hillary administration. WikiLeaks keeps an eye on them, and may drop another batch of Hillary’s emails. True Americans noticed inconsistencies, and President Trump, who often criticized Clinton for her scandalous actions, did too. Let us not forget how Hillary narrowly avoided prosecution when she deleted her pool of emails. We still have high hopes that justice will be served on that front as well. It’s great that we’re finally in a place where we can start taking out the people who are weighing us down. We’ve been betrayed for years. The Obama administration did nothing for the U.S., and Hillary was almost president, until we changed history. The Left is outraged that their scheme is finally unraveling, but honestly, it’s about time! There are more changes coming in our country, and for the better. We look forward to seeing what’s next for the United States! __________________________
Posted by Sam Di Gangi **Article updated on 25 March 2017 At 11:31 PT;
The ban was passed in the Montana House and aimed at preventing all foreign laws from being enacted in the U.S. (including Sharia law, which was mentioned specifically).** It took some doing, but the PC crowd lost, and sharia law shall NEVER be recognized in America. Many on the right know that Senator Rand Paul (R-KY) has brought forth a couple of ideas for making sure that sharia law can never be welcomed into America. He wishes, as do many sound minds who honor the precepts of liberty, to halt the hold that radical Islamic practices would have upon our culture, and those who would suffer mercilessly under it. Under this awful rule, humans are treated as objects to be abused for the smallest infraction. This is all due to the teachings of a man who claimed to get the divine message of Islam in between marrying children and trampling the rights of Jews and Christians. After worrying about the “intent” of a bill to “prohibit state courts from applying foreign law” and to stop the honoring of sharia from poisoning the West as it has the Middle East and is doing in London, the legislation moved onward. It passed the “House largely along party lines with a 56-44 vote” (confirmed by Billings Gazette). Maybe some were worried that the law would be used as it should be, not just against sharia law, but against the United Nations, NATO and any other foreign body who the left worships. THAT is likely what their main concern was, and it is something that could really help America escape the evil edicts of the NWO.
Sharia law has found itself able to weasel into many western cultures but it won’t be doing so very easily in America. The other concern with Senate Bill 97 is that it may not be “tolerant” enough of religions that long to cut our heads off and throw us from skyscrapers while beating our daughters in honor killings. After all, what politically correct hollow-head on the left does not care more about the feelings of butchers within our society than the people who they butcher? While this bill does not spell out sharia law as the target in the bill, it was the only system mentioned during talks. Still, if the U.N. gets too oppressive with things like the global warming circus of lies, it will be nice to have this law as a lifeline, even independent from the woes of Islam that it shall prevent. The Democrats said that the bill “targeted Muslims,” but perhaps in some instances, Islam NEEDS to be targeted for the good of us all. While there are idiot Christians that go on killing sprees, for instance, there are not millions of Christ’s followers promising to enter nations posing as refugees and blowing up their citizens for Jesus. It is not Hindus or even the godless doing this. It is Islam, and for THAT reason, people are asking questions that they don’t of others. This is the simple, unwashed fact of the matter regardless of who likes it. Those with wisdom should celebrate the fact, not curse nor condemn it. Wherever sharia law if found, misery abounds.
When asked if this attacks a certain group of people, Rep. Brad Tschida, R-Missoula said that “As far as being determined xenophobic, that’s an insult. I’m not intolerant. This is not anti-Muslim.” The fact is that it really isn’t unless said Muslim wants to try and create the caliphate that he or she believes Allah intended here on Earth among ALL people. This is what some believe, many of them willing to use force as they feel that it is ordained by god to do it, and this kind of person deserves to be targeted. If this hurts someone’s feelings then maybe they are a bit too sensitive to survive the American experience and will likely not find happiness here. While such a person should not be abused, they are simply not welcomed and are free to comply or to leave. Theresa Manzella, R-Hamilton chimed in, saying, “We’ve heard a lot of discussions about this being a religious law and specifically directed at preventing Sharia Law and I just don’t read it that way.” It is actually happening in the U.S.A. today that members of Congress have to justify passing a law that prevents the existing laws of the land from being negated. It is ridiculous that such a bill would even need to be. An article in the Billings Gazette does report that some of the wiser Democrats (which are growing harder and harder to locate) cited “extensive testimony from proponents in committee who expressed fears that Muslims would eventually demand Sharia law be used in American courts.” That is the ultimate goal here, to tell the Islamist that no matter what his little book says, sharia is not ever going to be acknowledged in any way, shape, matter, or form in America. If they don’t like the fact, our First Amendment does allow them to complain about it as they fast eastward praying! Supporting sharia law for economic benefits is like supporting Hitler because he was good to dogs. Even vile systems have perks. At the hearing, Sandy Bradford, a Helena resident said that Islam was not a peaceful religion at all. Sandy Montgomery, from the Flathead said, “We have allowed legal immigrants, illegal immigrants and now refugees to take advantage of our law and culture to take up their own agendas. They have no intention to abide by our laws, nor are they interested in assimilating to our culture.” These proved to be some of the most factual observations made during the course of the whole event.
It should be noted (so that she can be voted against upon bidding for re-election) that Rep. Ellie Hill Smith, D-Missoula found the wise bill “peppered with anti-Muslim bigotry.” In an insult to Jews, as if they are out cutting off heads and drowning people who are not Jewish as the Muslims do to the non-Islamic, Smith added an amendment out of spite that makes honoring the law of Moses illegal, too. To her, sewing two garments into one (an old Jewish law) is to be guarded against as much as having one’s genitals mutilated or having women stoned in the street for talking to a man. People all over support BANNING SHARIA LAW! “The courts have said that laws that single out certain religions violate the First Amendment,” she said, ““So with this amendment I think we can show the state of Montana that is not just about Islamic Law.” Thankfully the insult was handed back when the doltish amendment lost 82-18. A bill just as important failed in Oklahoma, a land where lawmakers must find the thought of wife beating to be “tolerable,” it can be deduced. Therefore, warning against it now, Rep. Laurie Bishop, D-Livingston said to remember that our “children are watching,” which is good. Perhaps as they watch, the shall learn how to preserve a democratic republic and shun a hateful religion. Both are great life lessons to observe. __________________________
The Washington Post has been caught changing a headline on one of its articles to imply Trump is causing illegals to choose between food and being deported.
The mainstream media has had a hard time staying out of trouble lately. With a new administration and furious voters around the country that won’t allow them to get away with anything, the fake news being reported by liberal publications has become more noticeable. Last week, the Washington Post – no stranger to spinning news to fit their liberal agenda – was caught in another failed attempt to do just that. On Thursday, the Washington Post published an article that suggested illegal immigrants may be cancelling their food stamps for fear of being caught and deported by U.S. officials. This actually wasn’t far from the truth, give or take a few details, but what got the attention of readers was the headline switch. The article’s original headline was quickly changed shortly after being published. The original headline read: ‘Immigrants are now canceling their food stamps for fear that Trump will deport them’. To any non-partisan reader, this headline would seem informative and catchy, but not to the liberals who back the publication and only want to read what satisfies their taste for anti-Trump news. The headline was changed to reflect a more liberal angle.
The original headline didn’t seem to imply any wrongdoing by conservatives, so it was abruptly changed. The new headline reads: ‘Immigrants are going hungry so Trump won’t deport them’. Yes, seriously. The narrative magically shifted from “illegal immigrants are halting their abuse on the government in order to try and save themselves” to “Trump is now making people choose between food and deportation.” Just like that, the Washington Post proved that they have no moral or ethical limitations, and will spin what’s necessary in order to make sales. The new headline reflects a more liberal angle. Since the left is always touting numbers to try and prove their points, let’s take a look at some regarding welfare benefits in the United States.
The average household headed by an immigrant (legal or illegal) costs taxpayers $6,234 in federal welfare benefits, which is 41 percent higher than the $4,431 received by the average native household. The average immigrant household consumes 33 percent more cash welfare, 57 percent more food assistance, and 44 percent more Medicaid dollars than the average native household. Housing costs are about the same for both groups. At $8,251, households headed by immigrants from Central America and Mexico have the highest welfare costs of any sending region — 86 percent higher than the costs of native households. Illegal immigrant households cost an average of $5,692 (driven largely by the presence of U.S.-born children), while legal immigrant households cost $6,378. The greater consumption of welfare dollars by immigrants can be explained in large part by their lower level of education and larger number of children compared to natives. Over 24 percent of immigrant households are headed by a high school dropout, compared to just 8 percent of native households. In addition, 13 percent of immigrant households have three or more children, vs. just 6 percent of native households. “But illegal immigrants can’t get welfare benefits.” Actually, they can and they do – even WaPo can’t avoid reporting that as a fact. According to the Department of Agriculture, 1.5 million non-citizens received food stamps in the 2015 fiscal year, as did 3.9 million non-citizen adults with citizen children. The rules for receiving public assistance are strict, and immigrants tend to utilize food benefits at a much lower rate than their native-born neighbors. Studies have also shown that immigrant households tend to suffer more hunger.
This isn’t the first time the newspaper has been caught spinning stories to appeal to liberal readers and backers who only want to read a certain type of news. In January, the publication was found editing a story on Russian hacking to compensate for the reporter’s failure to gather sufficient information. Forbes called them out on their fake news. The Washington Post, along with several other publications, makes it a point to publish the extremely liberal point of view as much as possible. The story is about people who are in the United State illegally using our welfare system to survive instead of finding work, supporting their families and going through the correct process to become a resident or citizen. How is any of that President Trump’s fault? Is it because he’s working on putting an end to it? For the publication, the new narrative makes much more sense. In the original headline, no one could gather the comparison between Trump and a dictator who thrives on starving and killing innocent people, so obviously a change needed to be made. A title that seemed to shed light on the truth would never pass muster. They couldn’t possibly think by calling out illegal immigrants who are only choosing not to continue mooching off the government in order to further hide from facing the consequences of their actions would make for a good enough story.
Sadly, the Washington Post wasn’t always like this. In fact, it was once one of the more respectable publications out there. Not anymore, though. Ultra-liberal Jeff Bezos, who owns Amazon, purchased the Washington Post in 2013. After years of decline for the publication, he decided to jump into uncharted waters and drop $250 million to acquire it. He had no previous experience in the press, but was seeking an outlet to express his disdain for conservative politics. Just like that, the Washington Post went from middle-of-the-road non-partisan to the extreme left. Jeff Bezos, the super liberal owner of Amazon, bought the Washington Post in 2013 for $250 million and has used the publication to push his own radical leftist agenda. With an unlimited amount of funds at his disposal, Bezos has grown the newspaper staff to over 700. That’s 700 liberal-minded individuals who spend their entire workday turning facts around to support a losing party. Real news is no longer needed. The media needs to get it together and start helping push the solution instead of the problem. There are facts that support every decision President Trump and his administration are making, whether anyone likes it or not. For a group that claims to stand by facts, they sure don’t like it when it works against them. The entire agenda of the Washington Post is to create a false narrative to keep the drama going. What they are doing is keeping the liberals who read their rhetoric in the dark about real issues. __________________________
GOT HIM: Democrat Senator ARRESTED For Horrific Corruption. He’s Finished! Democrats have been immune to investigation for years, but with Attorney General Jeff Sessions at the helm, those days are long gone. After just two months in office, Senator Thomas Oaks from Baltimore, Maryland, was arrested on charges of corruption. He faces up to 20 years in prison if convicted for honest service wire fraud. (via Department of Justice) Honest service fraud is a federal charge for corrupt behavior conducted by public officials, wherein they favor one party over another for personal gain. Senator Oaks was only two months into his first term as senator, and the charges stemming from his alleged corruption began in September 2015. In September 2015, an undercover FBI agent was introduced to then-State Delegate Oaks. The FBI agent was posing as a businessman from out-of-town. The business the undercover agent claimed to work for was a real business, and had an agreement with the FBI. The agent expressed to Oaks his interest in obtaining government contracts in Baltimore. The first meeting occurred between Oaks, the undercover agent, and a cooperating individual. The conversation was recorded, as were all future conversations between Oaks and the undercover investigator. One contract the undercover agent attempted to secure was related to a Housing and Urban Development (HUD) project. Oaks sent multiple letters to the government using official letterhead in support of his friend. Oaks also filed a bond on behalf of the undercover agent to receive $250,000 in taxpayer money. This money would otherwise fund the HUD project. Over the course of the year-long investigation, the FBI agent paid Oaks over $15,000 for writing the letters and directing the bonds. While the FBI knew about the corruption for over two years, they were unable to act until Obama left office. Delegate Oaks’ corruption must have been known to Democrats. Still, they supported his rise to Senator in 2017. Despicable. Corruption is rampant in the Democrat party. We see it at the local level and we see it from their presidential candidates. When crooks like Hillary Clinton win the nomination for president, it sends a clear message to rank-and-file Democrats that their corruption is tolerable. But it’s anything but — it’s ruining our great country. __________________________
The following video is not long at all, but it will give you a feel of what we are dealing with here. FREEDOM WATCH is a legal watchdog, and this organization feels very strongly about the surveillance of the Trump Transition Team in November, December of 2016, and January of 2017. The stunning revelation that we are now facing as a society could not be more serious. In fact, Mr. Klayman of FREEDOM WATCH says that FBI Director Comey should be brought back to testify before Congress on March 28th. Mr. Klayman says he will be present to represent the American public and to gather as much information as he can.
Published on Mar 22, 2017 Comey should be hauled back to testify before the committee on March 28th – Klayman to be present at hearing Documents have just been uncovered from Mr. Klayman to Devin Nunes, which will define this story and are self-explanatory. WE THE PEOPLE appreciate Mr. Klayman and FREEDOM WATCH. We here at IWB will continue to report on this groundbreaking story. Stay tuned as we “unmask” the Government. 47 hard drives, 600 million pages of information.
The House Intel Chief confirms now that data was collected on the Trump Transition Team while Obama was in office. Further that data was leaked and widely disseminated throughout the Intelligence Community. And even further, some US citizens were “unmasked” and exposed throughout the network. The talk is that the Trump family was being discussed, President-elect Trump’s new agenda was being discussed, and the selection of his Cabinet members was also discussed. This is beyond the pale, and we knew something was amiss; but we had no idea that FBI Director Comey would blatantly lie to Congress. He said, “there was no evidence of Trump wiretapping” or “there was no evidence that Obama wiretapped Trump.” Whatever terms he used such as I quoted, really does not matter at this point. He outright denied that President Trump had been surveilled or “wiretapped.” The Intelligence Community has a really good command of the English language, and they use that command to confuse, deny, or change the meaning of an answer to a question. However, at this point, lets call a spade a spade.
At the time that Trump and his Transition Team were surveilled, it was President-elect Trump, and to make it very clear Obama was still officially President. What was the purpose of gathering this data, unmasking US citizens, and widely disseminating the data to only God knows who? Time will tell, and this is a criminal act, a felony, that carries with it a prison term of 10 years.
Thanks to Devin Nunes (R-Calif) House Intelligence Committee Chairman, we know this occurred, as he was so concerned he refused to keep this matter to himself for any amount of time. He immediately met with President Trump and held a press conference. He was clearly upset, and he told reporters that he got the additional information after he made an appeal at the hearing this week involving FBI Director Comey and NSA Chief Admiral Mike Rogers for people to come forward and offer more information, if there was any.
Nunes stated categorically that none of the information in the “dozens” of documents he saw had anything to do with Russia or any criminal investigation. You know, it sounds to me like there is no integrity in such people, who would take such actions as to record President-elect Trump’s personal time with his Transition Team and their exploration of the exciting process they were encountering. Now they are left with the foul taste of betrayal for the rest of their lives. That is why as Americans we must demand justice.
Nunes went on to say he now wants to know more details which he outlined for reporters. They are as follows:
Why wasn’t this information disclosed in the hearing this week?
Who requested the unmasking of those involved?
Who directed it?
Who directed THIS?
Were any laws broken?
The following is the most shocking aspect of this horrid act. Nunes said the NSA was trying to investigate the new disclosures, but he did not know if the FBI Director would help him. His exact words were: “We don’t know yet if the FBI is going to comply.”
Nunes went on to say the disclosures of the names of US citizens in this latest information left him “alarmed.”
He told reporters he had briefed House Speaker Paul Ryan on the information, and he was going to the White House Wednesday night to talk to President Trump.
The following exposes the House Intelligence Ranking Member, Congressman Adam Schiff (D-CA) true colors, and we must realize he is on the opposing team with FBI Director James Comey. He told reporters in a press conference that he would have preferred that Nunes present the information to their full committee before telling the media about it. He ended by saying, “This is not how you conduct an investigation.”
Really, Congressman Schiff, you, Sir, are a part of the problem! If Nunes had taken the information to Schiff before he held a press conference, I can guarantee you, we would not be privy to this disclosure, nor would we ever be. President Trump would not be vindicated in his comment that he felt he had been “wiretapped” …further WE THE PEOPLE would know nothing about this. FBI Director would still be walking around Washington cocky as a rooster, and the Intelligence Community would just go on their merry way listening in on US citizens and widely disseminating their conversations. Thank you, Devin Nunes….you are a hero.
Sometimes it takes only one small error to destroy a whole career or to tarnish an otherwise respectable legacy. It is sad when these blemishes occur, but even sadder when they occur due to pandering. Starbucks has long had a reputation for overpriced (but tasty) coffee and liberal “crybaby” political views. There is not a tree standing that the Seattle company has not hugged nor a leftist candidate or cause that they have not embraced. They have even replaced “Christmas Cups” with red “Holiday Cups” and, while some people complained, the caffeine was addictive enough that people overlooked it. It seems as if, at last, the days of Starbucks getting a free pass from customers are over. We have already seen Kellogg’s lose a fortune in revenue by attacking Trump and his Breitbart base. We saw Target take a huge hit as well when they catered to those too confused to know which restroom to use. Now Starbucks is shedding their CEO, Howard Schultz, after comments that he made about hiring refugees that many nations want to see fully vetted. Many feel that there are too many refugees now and that a safe zone in Syria is a better solution, rather than letting them in unvetted for jobs at coffee shops. Starbucks has already insulted many of their Christmas shoppers by caving in and offering “holiday” cups.
In a letter, Schultz wrote that Starbucks is making a “concerted effort to welcome and seek opportunities for those fleeing war, violence, persecution and discrimination. There are more than 65 million citizens of the world recognized as refugees by the United Nations, and we are developing plans to hire 10,000 of them over five years in the 75 countries around the world where Starbucks does business.” This sounds noble, for none of us want to see innocent people perish due to poverty or terrorism, but this is typical liberal trickery. The fact is that 65 million people can not be vetted for safety that rapidly. This letter was an attack on the “alt right,” a call for open borders and it was seen as such. There was no talk of hiring returning vets or those that need a job, either. The entire charade was likely nothing more than a chance to get the Schultz name engraved in the hearts and minds of misguided socialists anyhow. He is mentioned a lot for the Democratic 2020 presidential slot, so what better way to pontificate and look “progressive,” after all? While it may have done that, it alsodispleased the majority of people who voted for Donald Trump. When one remembers that France is also seeing an upsurge in “Trump-ism,” Schultz has cost the company millions on both shores. While attempting to secure the Democrat 2020 option for a presidential run, Schultz has been hobnobbing with leftists everywhere. Perhaps to focus on such a presidential run, Schultz was said to be leaving the company in December anyway. After promising to hire that many refugees just to spite Trump’s travel ban, he is being shown the door much sooner. Those on the right can only hope that his campaign run goes as “smoothly,” thus ensuring a Trump 2020 victory. All of this may make him wish that when he departed the company in 2000, he had stayed away rather than returning in 2008 for what the Conservative Tribune calls a “victory lap” that has turned into “a nightmare.”
The U.K. Daily Mail has found that Starbucks took a beating on their YouGov BrandIndex’s Buzz score, also. It is said that this is “a measure of how consumers feel about a brand” and that a hit of two-thirds was seen by Starbucks from Trump supporters. They started going to the local Coffee Caribou or somewhere else for their cup of morning Joe. One of the findings “noted that the data around this boycott is different because both the measures of consumers’ sentiment toward companies and their willingness to purchase from those brands are declining.” This means that coffee drinkers are not only feeling differently about the company, but also refusing to purchase based upon those feelings. Much like Podesta and Clinton with satanic spirit cooking, Schultz and Starbucks have a theme of unholy symbolism involved in their products. This is a common thread on the left. Credit Suisse, according to CNBC, kept their hold rating on Starbucks since both the “brand” and “sales” have been hurt terribly by Schultz and his ill-timed letter. Jason West, an equity analyst with Credit Suisse, wrote, “Our work shows a sudden drop in brand sentiment following announcement of the refugee hiring initiative on Jan. 29, to flattish from a run-rate of ~+80 (on an index of -100 to +100). Net sentiment has since recovered, but has seen significant volatility in recent weeks,” which is a long-winded version of saying, “they are sinking like an iron anchor.” If Schultz had set out to harm his company and the bottom line, he could not have done a better job than he did in error. The left loves to paint Trump supporters and those who don’t want to be blown up by terrorists posing as refugees as turning their backs on “those fleeing war, violence, persecution and discrimination,” as said in his letter. This implies that everyone who wants to be sure of who is coming is a coward who has no empathy for their fellow man. They never mention the fact that those who want to kill and maim are pretending to be refugees by mingling in and waiting for the right time to unleash hell. That is NEVER mentioned.
The FBI has found that one in three domestic terrorism cases are tied to refugees. For this to be true, what we are seeing is the ISIS plan unfolding just as they had promised that it would. They took the weapons given to them by Obama, or that they stole from those that he gave them to, and rained terror upon the peaceful Muslims of Syria and areas nearby. When innocent families began to flee, they blended in like demonic chameleons and pretended to be in need. From there, they moved into the culture and aim to destroy it. Lastly, whenever anyone questions it, they are called “racist and cold-hearted,” thus helping the terrorists further by making it about the innocents. IT HAS NEVER BEEN ABOUT THE INNOCENTS! It is about protecting us from OTHERS! NO ONE hates or wishes harm on those who are just in the middle of this fight no matter how many times the left says it
These are facts that Starbucks are just now finding to be true. They are discovering that when they call the cops on someone for saying that their name is “Trump” when they order coffee (so that the counter person has to say it loudly when the coffee is done) that this costs them. They may get brownie points from the progressive left for such stunts, but they would be wise to understand that such left-wingers are a group of people who are vastly dwindling as the Trump train rolls onward. They are going to sell a lot less coffee if they don’t soon grasp this truth. __________________________