"Tea Party Surges to Win Wars Waged by Democrat Lies… " www Aileen Milton, President of The Villages Tea Party ________________________
Fox News has fired Judge Andrew Napolitano (pictured) for exposing UK spy agencies working with Obama, according to his report.
Fox News Fires Judge Napolitano After He Proved Obama Treason Live On The Air Posted by Sam Di Gangi | Mar 21, 2017 Fox News has fired Judge Andrew Napolitano (pictured) for exposing UK spy agencies working with Obama, according to his report. One of the most popular faces on news-based TV, Judge Andrew Napolitano, is being let go by Fox News. This is happening “after disavowing his on-air claim that British intelligence officials had helped former President Barack Obama spy on Donald Trump,” according to Yahoo News. A person with knowledge of the situation who chose not to be named has said that the Judge will not be with the network any longer nor will he be in any Fox segments. It all started last week on “Fox and Friends.” He said he had three different sources showing that Obama traveled “outside the chain of command” to spy and watch President Donald Trump. The United Kingdom called the accusation “nonsense” following White House Press Secretary Sean Spicer making a reference to the report during a briefing. This all goes back to Trump uncovering that he was spied on by Barack Obama before (and perhaps after) he was elected to office. Judge Napolitano was at the White House advising about Judge Gorsuch and was rumored to be on a short list for the Supreme Court.
In what seems to be a rather common theme in JamesComey’s left leaning F.B.I, it was declared by the agency that there is no proof that Trump was spied upon or wiretapped by Obama. This is the same director that when Wikileaks exposed all of the proof about Clinton, and didn’t need much research to move ahead with her prosecution, claimed that more time was needed. Now for something that DOES need to be researched in depth, it seems that Comey can reach a conclusion in no time at all. The President has flirted with the wise idea of appointing Napolitano to the Supreme Court before. However, he has said regarding the matter, “all we did was quote a certain very talented legal mind who was the one responsible for saying that on television. I didn’t make an opinion on it. You shouldn’t be talking to me. You should be talking to Fox.” This does not mean that “America’s Judge” is forbidden from being appointed to the highest court in the land. Clearly, he is free from other contractual obligations now. The problem is that he may be seen as tarnished, and might face huge opposition to his nomination if it were to happen. Now that he has been fired from Fox, those that oppose him on the left will call this matter in to question as a way to say that he is not honest. “America’s Judge” has been on the side of the true meaning of the Constitution for a very long time. Shepard Smith at Fox News all but fell over himself trying to run from the comments. He said, “Fox News knows of no evidence of any kind that the now-president of the United States was surveilled at any time, in any way.” This is the kind of statement by both Fox and Smith that could really come back to haunt them should the Judge’s words prove true. Napolitano is not a man who has a reputation for being wrong nor dishonest in any way. For this reason, if he was right, many viewers will see Fox just as they do CNN, which is fake news. They also will not easily forgive the besmirching of Napolitano or Trump, if vindicated.
This is more than likely to happen too, considering that he had served on the New Jersey Superior Court from 1987 to 1995, and has more than a bit of experience gathered from the post to know facts when he hears them. It is not very probable that Napolitano made up the three sources, either. One source could be any crackpot, two sources would be common, but three? For him to pick three as his number, he must have really had the sources. Unfortunately for “America’s Judge,” unless the three prove brave enough to stand up for him, he could be in real trouble trying to prove this. It can not be imagined that he would ask them to out themselves. While Judge Gorsuch will likely fill the Scalia vacancy, Napolitano was on a short list to replace Ginsburg or any of the elder Supreme Court members in the future. He has been with Fox as a senior judicial analyst since 1998, so it is odd that the network would not have a bit more faith and trust placed in him by now. There is simply no feasible way that he would openly sacrifice his career and quite possibly his future on the American Supreme Court just to flirt with a lie. His motive could be to secure a place of security in Trump’s future plans for the Supreme Court, but he has already been consulted for Judge Gorsuch. His name is ALREADY on the short list for any openings. As such, he has no motive whatsoever to have stretched the truth in this report. It is far more likely that the Judge has stood by his morals and his ethics. He was most likely fired for refusing to expose who told him. He could do that, but then he would have to look into the mirror when done. Considering that so many people are murdered for bravely telling the truth, Napolitano could, in theory, be signing someone’s death sentence with such a disclosure. Beyond that, if they worked for a UK spying agency as said, these three heroes could lose their jobs, pensions and perhaps even be sent to prison for treason. If England uses the firing squad, that too could be an option since we are talking about spying agencies at the very top.
President Trump has grown irate over hacking and wiretapping that he says is coming from the left. Rather than send these sources to a life of exile as Snowden’s Russian neighbor, Napolitano can be expected to simply take the blow no matter how damaging. If he never gets to wear the black robe as he sits on the Supreme Court because of his report, he will accept it. If his future shot at that is lost then it was lost for the truth (at least the truth as he believed it to be when he said it). That is something a just judge can live with. Such a man is not driven by power or greed, so he would be (and still is) a remarkable choice for such a post. That will depend on two things, however. First, it depends on how much time passes before his name comes up when a justice retires or dies, and secondly, if Trump would still appoint him. If so, the president will see many political arrows from the Obama left flying for his head if, or when, he does. We do know that in all of these years of loyal judicial and analytical service, Judge Andrew Napolitano has been nothing but consistently correct. That means that either he suddenly decided to soil his reputation by lying about three sources in a spy story that otherwise would have passed the news cycle, or he was telling the truth. Where there is smoke, one often finds a fire. Hopefully, that burning smell is the aroma of the Judge happily torching his contract and looking onward.
Secretary of State Rex Tillerson has said military action is an option for handling North Korea.
Secretary of State Rex Tillerson said Friday that use of preemptive force on North Korea is an option for United States and South Korean military groups. His statement comes after countless threats from North Korea against the U.S. ally nation. They have also had multiple new tests involving intercontinental missiles launched toward the coast of Japan. Tillerson also closed the door to any talks with Pyongyang unless Kim Jong Un “de-nuclearizes the country and gives up all weapons of mass destruction.” His decision came following a visit to the buffer zone between North and South Korea this week. He witnessed a heavily armed border that he says is no good for either of the countries involved.
Before his meeting with South Korean officials, Tillerson visited Camp Bonifas, a United Nations base that is operated by U.S. military just outside the Demilitarized Zone. It’s an area that was created after the Korean war ended in 1953. After landing, he moved to the truce village of Panmunjom inside the DMZ, where the Korean War armistice was signed. The DMZ is guarded on both sides with land mines, razor wire fences, tank traps and hundreds of thousands of combat-ready troops. More than a million mines are believed to be buried inside the DMZ. Land mine explosions in 2015 that Seoul blamed on Pyongyang wounded two South Korean soldiers and led the countries to threaten each other with attacks. The Korean War ended with an armistice, not a treaty, which means the area is still technically in a state of war. When asked about the use of military force in a press conference, Tillerson said, “All options are on the table.” He went on to say that the United States does not want to engage in any combat, “but obviously if North Korea takes action that threatens South Korean forces or our own forces that would be met with [an] appropriate response. If they elevate the threat of their weapons program to a level that we believe requires action that option is on the table.”
North Korea has recently grown its nuclear program to a level that the United States finds not only unnecessary, but also very dangerous for all of East Asia. The development of more nuclear weapons violates several U.N. Security Council resolutions. Kim Jong Un, the country’s leader, seems unmoved by the presentation of tougher international sanctions. North Korea conducted 24 missile launches last year alone, all of which were done to test nuclear devices. Sources who have access to the program’s information claim the country could have a nuclear-tipped missile capable of reaching the United States within a few years if nothing is done to stop the development. Tillerson met with South Korean Foreign Affairs Minister Yun Byung-se, the country’s equivalent to the U.S. Secretary of State, as well as South Korea’s acting president, Hwang Kyo-ahn, earlier in the day. The meeting was part of Tillerson’s “listening tour” of Asia. The mission is to reach out to all of the major officials in Asia to discuss relations with each of them. The U.S. also wants to find a North Korean policy that all of its allies in the region can agree to. President Trump has spoken freely about his support for examining all options, including military force, in order to stop North Korea’s nuclear developments. Trump and Tillerson have criticized the Obama administration’s “strategic patience” with North Korea, which both men claim was just a way to avoid any interaction. Tillerson said the United States is now exploring “a new range of diplomatic, security and economic measures.”
President Trump and Secretary Tillerson agree that the Obama-era “strategic patience” needs to go. The U.S. and it allies in Japan and South Korea have pushed China to use its economic leverage over North Korea. However, the nation has instead announced its desire to begin diplomatic talks with the nuclear-armed country. In response, Tillerson said, “20 years of talks with North Korea have brought us to where we are today. It’s important that the leadership of North Korea realize that their current pathway of nuclear weapons and escalating threats will not lead to their objective of security and economic development. That pathway can only be achieved by denuclearizing, giving up their weapons of mass destruction, and only then will we be prepared to engage with them in talks.” Tillerson has also accused China of attacking South Korea’s economy in retaliation to the country’s implementation of Terminal High Altitude Area Defense, or THAAD, which the United States has played a vital role in. China’s government used its influence on its people to protest products from Lotte, a South Korean-owned company that depends on China for roughly 30 percent of its profits. Although Beijing officials have denied doing such, the company has brought up countless situations to prove otherwise.
North Korea has also responded to THAAD’s deployment, causing more tension on the Korean peninsula. The country has threatened both South Korea and the United States with nuclear attacks if they don’t halt the deployment immediately. These threats further prompted Tillerson and the State Department to engage in discussions with the surrounding countries sooner rather than later. On Monday, a South Korean news site announced that SEAL Team 6 and Delta Force were going to be joining the U.S. and South Korean military forces at the annual Foal Eagle and Key Resolve exercises this month. The report suggested that the military was conducting simulations to devise a plan to remove Kim Jong Un from his position in North Korea. A source from the Defense Ministry said even if the exercises aren’t meant for planning out Kim Jong Un’s assassination, it still makes a strong statement. In fact, the mere attendance of such U.S. military groups “will send a very strong message to North Korea, which is constantly carrying out military provocations.” SEAL Team 6 and Delta Force joined other military groups at Foal Eagle in South Korea. In response to the exercises, North Korea launched four missiles into the sea off the coast of Japan, giving the United States and its allies even more reason to start planning special operations. Is military action what we need to secure East Asia? If sanctions and patience haven’t worked, then perhaps combat will. ___________________________
Tea party switches to new operating strategy Recently I wrote that some tea party groups are disbanding; some due to “burnout”; some due to believing now that Donald Trump is president, their work of promoting good government is done. While I still believe there are fewer local tea party organizations today than before Trump’s election, I was informed by Aileen Milton, president of a large tea party group in The Villages, Florida, that her group has not disbanded but has shifted to a new mode of operating; one that doesn’t hold regularly scheduled membership meetings, but reaches out to members and other conservatives through an expansive set of websites. Milton operates several websites, led by a “master “site, The Villages Conservative Media: thevillagesconservativemedia.com. It video tapes special events and conducts interviews with international, national and local individuals and groups on a variety of topics and issues facing the nation. It also features links to important news sources, and a comprehensive archive of current and past presentations and interviews. Milton has also worked out a broadband connection with FreedomInAmerica.us where they have a separate channel that uploads her website programs to view on Roku. Essentially, Milton has replaced traditional membership meetings with a much more convenient and timely access to conservative events, educational presentations, and interviews with guest speakers. The Villages Conservative Media brings the best of a typical tea party meeting right into the home, in a broad range of commentaries, ready and available to anyone who has the time and the desire to be involved in the conservative agenda. In this age of soaring participation in Internet media, Aileen Milton’s package of informational websites may be the best model for organizations that want to cast the widest possible net of influence on the American people. You can reach The Villages Conservative Media at any one of these sites: thevillagesconservativemedia.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com. thevillagesteaparty.org
The FBI arrested him in St. Louis on Friday, March 3rd, 2017.
He is due to appear in court in Manhattan, New York.
He allegedly conducted a campaign of harassment against at least eight Jewish community centers nation wide.
He was cyber stalking his ex-girlfriend, who is white.
He made bomb threats in his ex-girlfriend’s name to Jewish Community Centers and to the Anti-Defamation League.
During 2 threats he claimed there were bombs in a Middle School and that there was going to be a ‘JEWISH NEWTOWN’.
Thompson has a twitter account @JuanMThompson fulled with anti-Semitic and racist tweets.
From November 2014 to January 2016, while working at The Intercept as a journalist in Chicago, he fabricated sources in stories and made up quotes out of whole cloth. (Read The Intercept apology here.)
He previously worked as an intern at Chicago Public Media WBEZ FM 91.5 and at DNAinfo.com Chicago.
He is a Democrat.
He is black.
He is a convert to Islam, a follower of Mohammed.
He ran for Mayor of St. Louis, Missouri.
Juan Thompson (left) with Hillary Clinton. Photo: Twitter He met and was photographed with Hillary Clinton (right). He said on Twitter, “In ’03 on a high school trip to DC I was obsessed w/@HillaryClinton. Man I was young and dumb.”
He voted for Bernie Sanders.
He accused President Trump of ethnic cleansing in a February 23rd, 2017 Tweet.
In another tweet Thompson calls 42% of Americans “filthy fascist appeasers, and says they should be “taken out along with (President) Trump”.
His Twitter profile reads, “You show me a capitalist, and I’ll show you a bloodsucker.”
He is also accused of sending nude photographs of his white ex-girlfriend to her boss.
He said on Twitter a ‘NASTY/RACIST #WHITEGIRL’ he dated ‘SENT A BOMB THREAT IN MY NAME & WANTS ME TO BE RAPED IN JAIL’.
During President Trump’s inaugural address and his recent address to Congress he denounced antisemitism and hate. President Trump, in the video below, denounces the recent wave of threats against America’s Jewish communities by whom we now know were perpetrated by Thompson in part.
The Geller Report notes: I can see kapo-Jews like Chuck Schumer and Wasserman-Schlutz getting behind this black antisemite, can’t you? He is the perfect Democrat candidate – a hater, a racist, and an antisemite. Sounds like Keith Ellison and a host of other Dems. And he’s a perfect journalist in Chicago – beloved racist, until two years of fake new stories and fake quotes became to ridiculous to ignore. Thompson is the poster child for the party of Barack Obama. The party of Marx, Mohammed, Manning and Meryl. FOLLOWING IS THE INDICTMENT: u.s. v. Juan Thompson Complaint 0 by Jessica McBride on Scribd __________________________
Mast Helps Start New Bipartisan Congressional Caucus to Support Our Lagoon
WASHINGTON, D.C. – U.S. Congressmen Brian Mast (R-FL) and Bill Posey (R-FL) have worked with their House colleagues to found a new bipartisan Congressional caucus to give the Indian River Lagoon a stronger voice and presence in the U.S. Congress. A total of twenty-three House Members have joined with Reps. Mast and Posey in forming the new Congressional Estuary Caucus, including Representatives Rick Larsen (D-WA), Suzanne Bonamici (D-OR) and Frank LoBiondo (R-NJ).
“Our waterways are central to the quality of life and the economy on the Treasure Coast. Keeping our water clean is an issue that transcends party lines—it affects all of our families,” Rep. Mast said. “I’ve committed to work with members of both parties to keep our water clean, and this caucus will provide an essential bipartisan forum to protect the Indian River Lagoon.”
“Our Lagoon is important to our quality of life, our local economies, tourism, our natural beauty, and provides a critical habitat to many indigenous species of wildlife and plant life,” Rep. Posey said. “This new caucus will help promote and protect our nation’s estuaries like the Indian River Lagoon by giving our communities a platform in Washington to educate our leaders on the important role that our estuaries play.”
The Indian River Lagoon stretches 156 miles along Florida’s east coast through five counties. More than 2,000 species of plants, 600 species of fish, 300 species of birds, and 53 threatened or endangered species inhabit the Indian River Lagoon for at least some portion of their lives, and scientists have shown our Lagoon to be one of the most biologically diverse estuaries in North America, with approximately 4,000 species documented to occur.
Rep. Mast serves as Vice Chairman of the Water Resources and Environment Subcommittee of the Transportation and Infrastructure Committee. As Vice Chairman, he has stated that his top priority will be protecting Treasure Coast waterways. He is also a member of the Everglades Caucus and the Bipartisan Climate Solutions Caucus. ___________________________
Mast Hosts 4 Hour Town Hall Meeting, Stays Until Every Question Answered
Veterans-Focused Town Hall Meeting Attended By More Than 400 People
Fort Pierce, Fla. – U.S. Congressman Brian Mast (FL-18) hosted a 4 hour town hall meeting on Friday, February 24, 2017. The veterans-themed town hall meeting, which was planned to provide support for our nation’s veterans and answer questions from people in the community, was originally scheduled to last 1.5 hours. After more than 400 people turned out for the town hall, Rep. Mast rescheduled his afternoon so that he could stay and hear from everyone who wanted the opportunity to speak. The townhall began at 1:00 p.m. and ended at 5:10 p.m.
“We may not always agree on every issue, but it’s critical to listen to each other and hear all sides of an issue,” Rep. Mast said. “I stayed for four hours today so that everyone who wanted an opportunity to ask a question had an opportunity to have their voice heard. I strongly believe that there is far more that we can agree on than we disagree on.”
Rep. Mast offered services for veterans at the event, including having caseworkers available to help veterans with the Department of Veterans Affairs. He answered questions on a wide range of issues from veterans to healthcare and protecting the environment.
Last week, Rep. Mast hosted a 1.5 hour telephone town hall meeting with nearly 3,000 people. He has responded to more than 3,000 questions sent into his office since he was sworn in less than 2 months ago. __________________________
Sept 29th Demand apology from Government Officials who use this description for Concerned American Citizens
Definition of a Tea bagger .. To tea bag is a slang term for the sexual act of a man placing his scrotum in the mouth of a willing sexual partner for pleasure or onto the face or head of another person. The name of the practice, when it is done in a repeated in-and-out motion, is derived from its passing resemblance to the dipping of a tea bag into a cup of hot water as a method of brewingtea. As a form of non-penetrative sex, it can be done for its own enjoyment or as foreplay. _________________________
Posted by Sam Di Gangi **Article updated on 25 March 2017 At 11:31 PT;
The ban was passed in the Montana House and aimed at preventing all foreign laws from being enacted in the U.S. (including Sharia law, which was mentioned specifically).** It took some doing, but the PC crowd lost, and sharia law shall NEVER be recognized in America. Many on the right know that Senator Rand Paul (R-KY) has brought forth a couple of ideas for making sure that sharia law can never be welcomed into America. He wishes, as do many sound minds who honor the precepts of liberty, to halt the hold that radical Islamic practices would have upon our culture, and those who would suffer mercilessly under it. Under this awful rule, humans are treated as objects to be abused for the smallest infraction. This is all due to the teachings of a man who claimed to get the divine message of Islam in between marrying children and trampling the rights of Jews and Christians. After worrying about the “intent” of a bill to “prohibit state courts from applying foreign law” and to stop the honoring of sharia from poisoning the West as it has the Middle East and is doing in London, the legislation moved onward. It passed the “House largely along party lines with a 56-44 vote” (confirmed by Billings Gazette). Maybe some were worried that the law would be used as it should be, not just against sharia law, but against the United Nations, NATO and any other foreign body who the left worships. THAT is likely what their main concern was, and it is something that could really help America escape the evil edicts of the NWO.
Sharia law has found itself able to weasel into many western cultures but it won’t be doing so very easily in America. The other concern with Senate Bill 97 is that it may not be “tolerant” enough of religions that long to cut our heads off and throw us from skyscrapers while beating our daughters in honor killings. After all, what politically correct hollow-head on the left does not care more about the feelings of butchers within our society than the people who they butcher? While this bill does not spell out sharia law as the target in the bill, it was the only system mentioned during talks. Still, if the U.N. gets too oppressive with things like the global warming circus of lies, it will be nice to have this law as a lifeline, even independent from the woes of Islam that it shall prevent. The Democrats said that the bill “targeted Muslims,” but perhaps in some instances, Islam NEEDS to be targeted for the good of us all. While there are idiot Christians that go on killing sprees, for instance, there are not millions of Christ’s followers promising to enter nations posing as refugees and blowing up their citizens for Jesus. It is not Hindus or even the godless doing this. It is Islam, and for THAT reason, people are asking questions that they don’t of others. This is the simple, unwashed fact of the matter regardless of who likes it. Those with wisdom should celebrate the fact, not curse nor condemn it. Wherever sharia law if found, misery abounds.
When asked if this attacks a certain group of people, Rep. Brad Tschida, R-Missoula said that “As far as being determined xenophobic, that’s an insult. I’m not intolerant. This is not anti-Muslim.” The fact is that it really isn’t unless said Muslim wants to try and create the caliphate that he or she believes Allah intended here on Earth among ALL people. This is what some believe, many of them willing to use force as they feel that it is ordained by god to do it, and this kind of person deserves to be targeted. If this hurts someone’s feelings then maybe they are a bit too sensitive to survive the American experience and will likely not find happiness here. While such a person should not be abused, they are simply not welcomed and are free to comply or to leave. Theresa Manzella, R-Hamilton chimed in, saying, “We’ve heard a lot of discussions about this being a religious law and specifically directed at preventing Sharia Law and I just don’t read it that way.” It is actually happening in the U.S.A. today that members of Congress have to justify passing a law that prevents the existing laws of the land from being negated. It is ridiculous that such a bill would even need to be. An article in the Billings Gazette does report that some of the wiser Democrats (which are growing harder and harder to locate) cited “extensive testimony from proponents in committee who expressed fears that Muslims would eventually demand Sharia law be used in American courts.” That is the ultimate goal here, to tell the Islamist that no matter what his little book says, sharia is not ever going to be acknowledged in any way, shape, matter, or form in America. If they don’t like the fact, our First Amendment does allow them to complain about it as they fast eastward praying! Supporting sharia law for economic benefits is like supporting Hitler because he was good to dogs. Even vile systems have perks. At the hearing, Sandy Bradford, a Helena resident said that Islam was not a peaceful religion at all. Sandy Montgomery, from the Flathead said, “We have allowed legal immigrants, illegal immigrants and now refugees to take advantage of our law and culture to take up their own agendas. They have no intention to abide by our laws, nor are they interested in assimilating to our culture.” These proved to be some of the most factual observations made during the course of the whole event.
It should be noted (so that she can be voted against upon bidding for re-election) that Rep. Ellie Hill Smith, D-Missoula found the wise bill “peppered with anti-Muslim bigotry.” In an insult to Jews, as if they are out cutting off heads and drowning people who are not Jewish as the Muslims do to the non-Islamic, Smith added an amendment out of spite that makes honoring the law of Moses illegal, too. To her, sewing two garments into one (an old Jewish law) is to be guarded against as much as having one’s genitals mutilated or having women stoned in the street for talking to a man. People all over support BANNING SHARIA LAW! “The courts have said that laws that single out certain religions violate the First Amendment,” she said, ““So with this amendment I think we can show the state of Montana that is not just about Islamic Law.” Thankfully the insult was handed back when the doltish amendment lost 82-18. A bill just as important failed in Oklahoma, a land where lawmakers must find the thought of wife beating to be “tolerable,” it can be deduced. Therefore, warning against it now, Rep. Laurie Bishop, D-Livingston said to remember that our “children are watching,” which is good. Perhaps as they watch, the shall learn how to preserve a democratic republic and shun a hateful religion. Both are great life lessons to observe. __________________________
The Washington Post has been caught changing a headline on one of its articles to imply Trump is causing illegals to choose between food and being deported.
The mainstream media has had a hard time staying out of trouble lately. With a new administration and furious voters around the country that won’t allow them to get away with anything, the fake news being reported by liberal publications has become more noticeable. Last week, the Washington Post – no stranger to spinning news to fit their liberal agenda – was caught in another failed attempt to do just that. On Thursday, the Washington Post published an article that suggested illegal immigrants may be cancelling their food stamps for fear of being caught and deported by U.S. officials. This actually wasn’t far from the truth, give or take a few details, but what got the attention of readers was the headline switch. The article’s original headline was quickly changed shortly after being published. The original headline read: ‘Immigrants are now canceling their food stamps for fear that Trump will deport them’. To any non-partisan reader, this headline would seem informative and catchy, but not to the liberals who back the publication and only want to read what satisfies their taste for anti-Trump news. The headline was changed to reflect a more liberal angle.
The original headline didn’t seem to imply any wrongdoing by conservatives, so it was abruptly changed. The new headline reads: ‘Immigrants are going hungry so Trump won’t deport them’. Yes, seriously. The narrative magically shifted from “illegal immigrants are halting their abuse on the government in order to try and save themselves” to “Trump is now making people choose between food and deportation.” Just like that, the Washington Post proved that they have no moral or ethical limitations, and will spin what’s necessary in order to make sales. The new headline reflects a more liberal angle. Since the left is always touting numbers to try and prove their points, let’s take a look at some regarding welfare benefits in the United States.
The average household headed by an immigrant (legal or illegal) costs taxpayers $6,234 in federal welfare benefits, which is 41 percent higher than the $4,431 received by the average native household. The average immigrant household consumes 33 percent more cash welfare, 57 percent more food assistance, and 44 percent more Medicaid dollars than the average native household. Housing costs are about the same for both groups. At $8,251, households headed by immigrants from Central America and Mexico have the highest welfare costs of any sending region — 86 percent higher than the costs of native households. Illegal immigrant households cost an average of $5,692 (driven largely by the presence of U.S.-born children), while legal immigrant households cost $6,378. The greater consumption of welfare dollars by immigrants can be explained in large part by their lower level of education and larger number of children compared to natives. Over 24 percent of immigrant households are headed by a high school dropout, compared to just 8 percent of native households. In addition, 13 percent of immigrant households have three or more children, vs. just 6 percent of native households. “But illegal immigrants can’t get welfare benefits.” Actually, they can and they do – even WaPo can’t avoid reporting that as a fact. According to the Department of Agriculture, 1.5 million non-citizens received food stamps in the 2015 fiscal year, as did 3.9 million non-citizen adults with citizen children. The rules for receiving public assistance are strict, and immigrants tend to utilize food benefits at a much lower rate than their native-born neighbors. Studies have also shown that immigrant households tend to suffer more hunger.
This isn’t the first time the newspaper has been caught spinning stories to appeal to liberal readers and backers who only want to read a certain type of news. In January, the publication was found editing a story on Russian hacking to compensate for the reporter’s failure to gather sufficient information. Forbes called them out on their fake news. The Washington Post, along with several other publications, makes it a point to publish the extremely liberal point of view as much as possible. The story is about people who are in the United State illegally using our welfare system to survive instead of finding work, supporting their families and going through the correct process to become a resident or citizen. How is any of that President Trump’s fault? Is it because he’s working on putting an end to it? For the publication, the new narrative makes much more sense. In the original headline, no one could gather the comparison between Trump and a dictator who thrives on starving and killing innocent people, so obviously a change needed to be made. A title that seemed to shed light on the truth would never pass muster. They couldn’t possibly think by calling out illegal immigrants who are only choosing not to continue mooching off the government in order to further hide from facing the consequences of their actions would make for a good enough story.
Sadly, the Washington Post wasn’t always like this. In fact, it was once one of the more respectable publications out there. Not anymore, though. Ultra-liberal Jeff Bezos, who owns Amazon, purchased the Washington Post in 2013. After years of decline for the publication, he decided to jump into uncharted waters and drop $250 million to acquire it. He had no previous experience in the press, but was seeking an outlet to express his disdain for conservative politics. Just like that, the Washington Post went from middle-of-the-road non-partisan to the extreme left. Jeff Bezos, the super liberal owner of Amazon, bought the Washington Post in 2013 for $250 million and has used the publication to push his own radical leftist agenda. With an unlimited amount of funds at his disposal, Bezos has grown the newspaper staff to over 700. That’s 700 liberal-minded individuals who spend their entire workday turning facts around to support a losing party. Real news is no longer needed. The media needs to get it together and start helping push the solution instead of the problem. There are facts that support every decision President Trump and his administration are making, whether anyone likes it or not. For a group that claims to stand by facts, they sure don’t like it when it works against them. The entire agenda of the Washington Post is to create a false narrative to keep the drama going. What they are doing is keeping the liberals who read their rhetoric in the dark about real issues. __________________________
By Philip Sherwell, New York and Louise Barnett in Berlin 6:18PM GMT 27 Oct 2013 __________________________
NOW IT'S NEW DEMOCRATIC PARTY VS. AMERICAN WORKER Trevor Loudon exposes what's happened to the American left Published: 20 hours ago 1.2K President John F. Kennedy The Democratic Party once produced presidents such as Harry Truman and John F. Kennedy. Major party leaders were fierce opponents of mass immigration because they recognized the negative impact it had on wages. And America’s center-left party presented itself as a friend to American workers, fighting for their interests against corporate bosses. But the Democratic Party of the past is not the Democratic Party of today. Indeed, one author and researcher suggests the current Democratic Party is more concerned with defending “international socialism” than American workers. Trevor Loudon, who has researched communism and leftist movements for decades, exposes the change within the Democrats in his documentary “The Enemies Within.” He argues the current Democrat leadership team of chairman Tom Perez and vice-chairman Keith Ellison represents a fundamental departure for the party from its patriotic past. “It is a socialist party,” he told WND. “Today’s Democratic Party has completely abandoned the ‘middle ground.’ It is now a full-on ‘progressive party’ with an agenda and platform almost indistinguishable from that of the Communist Party, or Democratic Socialists of America – which incidentally openly backed Ellison in his race against Perez. “The Democrats of today would be marching in the streets against traditional Democrats such as Harry Truman or JFK.” As Loudon showed in his research, Congressman Keith Ellison, now second-in-command at the Democratic National Committee, has a long history of involvement with both the Communist Party and radical Islamic groups. “Ellison is the poster boy for the red-green axis – the alliance between the communist and Islamist movements,” he said. “In his student activist days he worked with Maoists, and was active in the Nation of Islam. As a congressman he was close to the Communist Party USA – even holding fundraisers in the home of Minnesota party chairman Erwin Marquit. He has even written for the Communist Party website. “All the while he was actively involved with several Muslim Brotherhood front groups such as CAIR and the Muslim American Society, which even paid for his pilgrimage to Mecca in 2008.” Yet chairman Tom Perez also has a radical past. “Tom Perez was a longtime leader of CASA de Maryland, a militant left ‘immigrants’ rights group,” Loudon told WND. “A few years ago President Hugo Chavez of Venezuela was sending one million dollars a year of his oil revenue to CASA, which was bent on keeping America’s borders wide open.”
Loudon points out the Democratic Party has not always been characterized by unquestioning support for open borders. Indeed, the American left’s sudden backing of mass immigration is fairly recent. “Until the mid-1990s, both the AFL-CIO and the Democrats were staunchly opposed to lax border security,” explains Loudon. “Illegal immigration disproportionately hurt both the black community and their white working class base. “However, in 1994, the Democratic Socialists of America, under John Sweeney, took over the AFL-CIO from Lane Kirkland and his supporters. The clause prohibiting communists from holding AFL-CIO office was quietly dropped. Now the AFL-CIO is completely controlled by the hard left. Orchestrated by another DSAer, Eliseo Medina, the AFL-CIO switched its policy in 2000 to open support for amnesty for illegal immigrants. The Democrats quickly followed suit.”
Loudon argues the modern Democratic Party has abandoned even the pretense of trying to help American workers. Instead, they seek to gain power by essentially replacing the current American people with a new one. “The prize was 12 to 30 million illegals – who would vote 70 to 80 percent Democrat,” Loudon said. “This would effectively bring about a one-party state, controlled by the Dems and the communist controlled unions. The AFL-CIO and Democratic Party today represent international socialism. Damn the American worker.” As a result, the current Democratic Party is really just an anti-white coalition. Tom Perez has a long history of anti-white views, including a declaration that white people should not be entitled to protection under the Voting Rights Act. “The Democratic plan is simply to replace American citizens,” says Loudon. “The left wants to expand the Democratic Party voting base to create a socialist one-party state. The simplest way to do this is to flood the country with immigrants from Third World countries, who have little interest in the Constitution and are reliable Democratic voters.” However, Loudon argues President Donald Trump can counter the Democrats’ identity politics driven strategy with policies that will help American workers of all races. “If Donald Trump is smart, he could confound that plan by closing the borders,” Loudon said. “He should be dramatically reducing all immigration and promoting America First, low tax, high growth policies which will win over significant numbers of working class, black, Asian and Latino voters. The most dangerous enemy is the one who operates from within your own gates. Discover the traitors within our own country and help spread the word about how America is already under attack. Don’t miss “The Enemies Within” available now in the WND Superstore.
Tim Kaine’s son arrested after disrupting pro-Trump protest By Joe Tacopino March 8, 2017 | 2:50am |Updated Modal Trigger Linwood KaineRamsey County Sheriff’s Office The son of former vice presidential candidate Tim Kaine reportedly was arrested during a clash between protesters at a pro-Trump rally. Linwood Michael Kaine, 24, was busted for second-degree riot after the melee that took place in St. Paul, Minnesota, on Saturday during a rally in support of President Trump, according to Minnesota’s Pioneer Press. Kaine, whose father was on the 2016 Democratic presidential ticket with Hillary Clinton, was released from jail Tuesday and the city attorney is considering whether to file misdemeanor charges, the paper said. The chaos unfolded when anti-Trump protesters descended on St. Paul’s capitol rotunda Saturday during a March 4 Trump rally. Demonstrators blew whistles and airhorns while one allegedly threw a smoke bomb into the crowd — striking a 61-year-old woman in the head, the Pioneer Press reported. A total of five people were arrested for rioting and another busted for disorderly conduct. _________________________
Brzezinski: Controlling What People Think ‘Is Our Job byIAN HANCHETT22 Feb 2017 On Wednesday’s broadcast of MSNBC’s “Morning Joe,” co-host Mika Brzezinski stated President Trump “could have undermined the messaging so much that he can actually control exactly what people think. And that is our job.” Brzezinski said, “I think that the dangerous, you know, edges here are that he’s is trying to undermine the media, trying to make up his own facts. And it could be that, while unemployment and the economy worsens, he could have undermined the messaging so much that he can actually control exactly what people think. And that is our job.” ___________________________
Ivanka Trump FINALLY Got Revenge Against Nordstrom. This is AMAZING. As Trump’s campaign gathered steam, it appeared that liberals decided the best way to fight back was to stop buying Ivanka Trump’s products. Instead of weathering the storm, Nordstrom decided to cut bait and bow to the liberal fold and stopped selling her products altogether. But, revenge is sweet, and online retailer Amazon continued to sell and Ivanka’s fans continued to buy, resulting in Ivanka’s perfume line now being ranked #1 on the site, ahead of the likes of Estee Lauder and Jennifer Lopez’s brands, via MarketWatch. While Nordstrom issued numerous statements that they made their decision because her lines were not selling, I find that hard to believe. I do not doubt that liberals stopped buying, but I believe there was pressure being put on the store, by liberals, to stop being the main outlet for Ivanka’s products. We all know how much liberals like to protest, so the store made the conscious decision to stop selling her products, ignoring its quieter conservative base for the loudmouths in the liberal camps. Nordstrom only made matters worse by making such a big deal about cutting her line. If they were not trying to make a statement, they would have very quietly cut ties with Ivanka, but that was not the case here. By going so public with their decision, they drew a line in the sand, one conservatives quickly made note of. As I recall, not long after the announcement was made, the company’s stock took a noticeable dip as conservatives did what they do best in cases such as this, they fought back with their wallets. Not only that, but I suspect there are now plenty of conservatives that used to spend a lot of money with the chain that will never do so again. All you have to is look at the tweet Scott Baio sent out to realize how much this will hurt their bottom line. His yearly bill alone was topping $30,000, so imagine the conservatives that shop there that are not quite as vocal and public as Mr. Baio. Ivanka and conservatives are definitely getting the last laugh here. __________________________
They’re Finally Going To Do It There are terrorist organizations that everyone in the United States, and possibly the world, has heard of. Groups like ISIS and al-Qaeda are among the most well known terrorist groups in the world, and for good reason. People would love nothing more than to see these groups eliminated. However even though most of the world has heard about those two groups, there are other terrorist organizations that exist that have the same goals, but are not classified as terrorist groups. It’s easy to attack an enemy that you know, but what about an enemy that you don’t know? President Donald Trump is planning to take one step closer to eliminating radical Islamic terrorists off the Earth, and it starts with designating more groups as terrorist organizations. One of these groups is the Muslim Brotherhood. You would think that people would want to see these types of organizations gone, but Democrat supporters continue to amaze us. Advertisement The New York Times released an editorial saying that they believe that President Trump shouldn’t call the Muslim Brotherhood a terrorist organization. Their reasoning? They believe it could make Trump the enemy of every single Muslim on the planet. The NYT Doesn’t Want Trump To Label The Muslim Brotherhood A Terrorist Group The paper, exceedingly liberal nowadays, published their opinions on Thursday in an article entitled “All of Islam Isn’t the Enemy.” In it, they argue against labeling the Muslim Brotherhood as a terrorist organization. It came up when CIA Director Mike Pompeo said he supports the move. The Muslim Brotherhood has openly announced their goal, which is to create a state that is ruled by Islamic law. Considering that Islamic law and the United States Constitution do NOT go together, that cannot happen. Advertisement The editors of the paper said, “Is President Trump trying to make enemies of the entire Muslim world? That could well happen if he follows up his primitive ban on refugees and visa holders from seven Muslim nations with an order designating the Muslim Brotherhood – perhaps the most influential Islamist group in he Middle East – as a terrorist organization.” However, there are several nations that have already labeled the Muslim Brotherhood as a terrorist group, including Egypt, Russia, Syria and Saudi Arabia. Three of those nations are majority Muslim and they had no problems labeling the group for what it was. The editors didn’t stop there, as they went ahead and claimed that the potential order “appears to be part of a mission by the president and his closest advisers to heighten fears by promoting a dangerously exaggerated vision of an American under siege by what they call radical Islam.” Except that America is under siege by “radical Islam.” How many times do you hear people from ISIS and al-Qaeda yelling and screaming about the death of America? If you ask any rational person, they will say that that is indeed radical. Advertisement Trump Is Protecting Us From Radical Islam! If we weren’t under attack from this everyday, then we wouldn’t hear about terrorist attacks on our college campuses or malls. Hell, we probably wouldn’t hear about terrorist attacks period! Unfortunately the Times have always been against Trump and his approach to fighting and ending radical Islamic terror. Wow how surprising, a liberal newspaper against Trump. In breaking news, water is wet! The editors published and released a column at the end of January and it was there that they expressed their horror at Trump stating his goal of wiping Islamic extremists from existence. They worried that Trump’s approach is “more likely to further inflame anti-American sentiment around the world than to make the United States safer.” How disturbing is it that the editors at The New York Times don’t want to see Trump fight Islamic terror? Seriously this is something that a majority of Americans are worried about on an everyday basis. Oh but according to the Times, we shouldn’t go out and do that. Advertisement Unfortunately that is what you would expect from a liberal paper. They have been consistently negative about Trump and all of his policies. In other words, like a true Democrat, they are just going to be against Trump and not even bother to listen to what he has to say. Considering that they don’t want to end Islamic terrorism, they’re already there. They’re Going To Be Against Trump All The Time This isn’t the first time that the Muslim Brotherhood is facing a new label. GOP Senators introduced new legislature that would call the Muslim Brotherhood a terrorist group. Trump isn’t the only person that is thinking about labeling the Muslim Brotherhood as a terrorist group, as several members of Congress are thinking the exact same thing. To make things worse, the Muslim Brotherhood forced public schools to give them the “right” to preach their sermons to children. They were going to input their radical beliefs into the minds of the next generation, and that is a scary thought to have indeed. Share this article with everyone to show them that The New York Times doesn’t want Trump to continue his war on radical Islam. They preached about Trump labeling another Islamic group as a terrorist group, despite the fact that several other nations have already done so, including Saudi Arabia. So the better question is this: What is the Times hiding? __________________________
Sometimes it takes only one small error to destroy a whole career or to tarnish an otherwise respectable legacy. It is sad when these blemishes occur, but even sadder when they occur due to pandering. Starbucks has long had a reputation for overpriced (but tasty) coffee and liberal “crybaby” political views. There is not a tree standing that the Seattle company has not hugged nor a leftist candidate or cause that they have not embraced. They have even replaced “Christmas Cups” with red “Holiday Cups” and, while some people complained, the caffeine was addictive enough that people overlooked it. It seems as if, at last, the days of Starbucks getting a free pass from customers are over. We have already seen Kellogg’s lose a fortune in revenue by attacking Trump and his Breitbart base. We saw Target take a huge hit as well when they catered to those too confused to know which restroom to use. Now Starbucks is shedding their CEO, Howard Schultz, after comments that he made about hiring refugees that many nations want to see fully vetted. Many feel that there are too many refugees now and that a safe zone in Syria is a better solution, rather than letting them in unvetted for jobs at coffee shops. Starbucks has already insulted many of their Christmas shoppers by caving in and offering “holiday” cups.
In a letter, Schultz wrote that Starbucks is making a “concerted effort to welcome and seek opportunities for those fleeing war, violence, persecution and discrimination. There are more than 65 million citizens of the world recognized as refugees by the United Nations, and we are developing plans to hire 10,000 of them over five years in the 75 countries around the world where Starbucks does business.” This sounds noble, for none of us want to see innocent people perish due to poverty or terrorism, but this is typical liberal trickery. The fact is that 65 million people can not be vetted for safety that rapidly. This letter was an attack on the “alt right,” a call for open borders and it was seen as such. There was no talk of hiring returning vets or those that need a job, either. The entire charade was likely nothing more than a chance to get the Schultz name engraved in the hearts and minds of misguided socialists anyhow. He is mentioned a lot for the Democratic 2020 presidential slot, so what better way to pontificate and look “progressive,” after all? While it may have done that, it alsodispleased the majority of people who voted for Donald Trump. When one remembers that France is also seeing an upsurge in “Trump-ism,” Schultz has cost the company millions on both shores. While attempting to secure the Democrat 2020 option for a presidential run, Schultz has been hobnobbing with leftists everywhere. Perhaps to focus on such a presidential run, Schultz was said to be leaving the company in December anyway. After promising to hire that many refugees just to spite Trump’s travel ban, he is being shown the door much sooner. Those on the right can only hope that his campaign run goes as “smoothly,” thus ensuring a Trump 2020 victory. All of this may make him wish that when he departed the company in 2000, he had stayed away rather than returning in 2008 for what the Conservative Tribune calls a “victory lap” that has turned into “a nightmare.”
The U.K. Daily Mail has found that Starbucks took a beating on their YouGov BrandIndex’s Buzz score, also. It is said that this is “a measure of how consumers feel about a brand” and that a hit of two-thirds was seen by Starbucks from Trump supporters. They started going to the local Coffee Caribou or somewhere else for their cup of morning Joe. One of the findings “noted that the data around this boycott is different because both the measures of consumers’ sentiment toward companies and their willingness to purchase from those brands are declining.” This means that coffee drinkers are not only feeling differently about the company, but also refusing to purchase based upon those feelings. Much like Podesta and Clinton with satanic spirit cooking, Schultz and Starbucks have a theme of unholy symbolism involved in their products. This is a common thread on the left. Credit Suisse, according to CNBC, kept their hold rating on Starbucks since both the “brand” and “sales” have been hurt terribly by Schultz and his ill-timed letter. Jason West, an equity analyst with Credit Suisse, wrote, “Our work shows a sudden drop in brand sentiment following announcement of the refugee hiring initiative on Jan. 29, to flattish from a run-rate of ~+80 (on an index of -100 to +100). Net sentiment has since recovered, but has seen significant volatility in recent weeks,” which is a long-winded version of saying, “they are sinking like an iron anchor.” If Schultz had set out to harm his company and the bottom line, he could not have done a better job than he did in error. The left loves to paint Trump supporters and those who don’t want to be blown up by terrorists posing as refugees as turning their backs on “those fleeing war, violence, persecution and discrimination,” as said in his letter. This implies that everyone who wants to be sure of who is coming is a coward who has no empathy for their fellow man. They never mention the fact that those who want to kill and maim are pretending to be refugees by mingling in and waiting for the right time to unleash hell. That is NEVER mentioned.
The FBI has found that one in three domestic terrorism cases are tied to refugees. For this to be true, what we are seeing is the ISIS plan unfolding just as they had promised that it would. They took the weapons given to them by Obama, or that they stole from those that he gave them to, and rained terror upon the peaceful Muslims of Syria and areas nearby. When innocent families began to flee, they blended in like demonic chameleons and pretended to be in need. From there, they moved into the culture and aim to destroy it. Lastly, whenever anyone questions it, they are called “racist and cold-hearted,” thus helping the terrorists further by making it about the innocents. IT HAS NEVER BEEN ABOUT THE INNOCENTS! It is about protecting us from OTHERS! NO ONE hates or wishes harm on those who are just in the middle of this fight no matter how many times the left says it
These are facts that Starbucks are just now finding to be true. They are discovering that when they call the cops on someone for saying that their name is “Trump” when they order coffee (so that the counter person has to say it loudly when the coffee is done) that this costs them. They may get brownie points from the progressive left for such stunts, but they would be wise to understand that such left-wingers are a group of people who are vastly dwindling as the Trump train rolls onward. They are going to sell a lot less coffee if they don’t soon grasp this truth. __________________________
Malik Obama Exposes Barack’s Alleged Birth Certificate From Kenya Posted by Sam Di Gangi | Mar 10, 2017 Is this the real Obama birth certificate showing that he was born in Kenya? When Sheriff Joe Arpaio and over ten forgery experts looked at Barack Obama’s birth certificate, they all came to the same conclusion. “Fake,” “fraudulent,” and “forgery” were the most common words used to describe the certificate, as chosen by those experts. It is almost impossible to find anyone who has even a cursory knowledge of document fraud detection willing to align their reputations to the claim that it is real. In a nutshell, Obama’s birth certificate has sent up so many red flags that if he were a refugee, his documents would not likely be accepted as actual proof of who he is. Yes, it is THAT bad. Now the former President’s own half-brother is weighing in on the topic and seems to have produced Obama’s real birth certificate. To the dismay of no one who is an authority on fakes, the more authentic looking certificate that was tweeted by Malik Obama shows that Barack Obama was born in Kenya! Surely. What’s this? pic.twitter.com/jaczNXTIv0
— Malik Obama (@ObamaMalik) March 9, 2017 The document, tweeted with the words “Surely. What’s this?” displays a link to a photo. That photo is the birth certificate in question. At this time there is no word on whether or not any of the aforementioned experts have reviewed the tweet in detail, but it can be assumed that this is being viewed by those experts. One of the main reasons that this matters so much is that the Constitution of the United States of America is very clear about rules concerning birth. EVERYTHING that Obama did, if he was illegally in office to start with, could be quite easily undone since he was not in a legal position to have ever been president. Showing that Obama weighed 7 lbs, 1 oz, at the time of his birth, this could be the vindication that President Trump has looked for over a great number of years. The whole purpose of the Constitution having this clause is to make sure, among other things, that a “Manchurian candidate” can not emerge. It means that one of the ways of preventing foreign influence from taking over the nation is to be sure that no one can be placed here from another nation and have children who can be presidents. Otherwise, other nations could strategically position families in elite positions within American politics–bringing us down from within. If Malik Obama really is a Trump supporter and if his tweet is not a hoax, why did he wait so long and make our nation suffer under his brother, Barack?
One would be hard-pressed to find a better example of this than in Obama, at least in terms of the damage that he did to America. Our alliance with Russia was destroyed over his NATO support, our healthcare is ruined, our culture is far removed from what had once made it great and race relations are in a dreadful state. We know that Obama’s school records are absent in many places and some wonder about what his status was while in college. Some documents seem to imply that he had a foreign exchange status as a student. These documents should also be looked at by experts. Why this has not been done is a mystery, though Obama has locked some up and hidden them. What is he hiding with school records? This is not just something noticed in America among those who oppose Democrats, either. The Israel Science and Technology team also ruled the certificate a forgery saying, ““In brief, this simple analysis using just a viewing software reveals that the PDF document has been altered by a graphics software.” One of the most glaring reasons for this is that the document features font types that were not in existence at the time that Obama was born. Font types all have different unique traits, be it Times Roman, Comic, San Serif, etc. The ramifications of this birth certificate showing that Obama was born in Kenya, if real, could be almost limitless. The Israeli team also found that “the font of the last digit was different from the other digits,” and “PDF file posted by the White House and found that the last digit of the birth certificate’s number, 61 10841, disappeared under 800-percent magnification.” Even Paul Irey, a retired professional typographer who has over a half of a century’s worth of experience in all things font related, finds many flaws in Obama’s birth certificate.
Irey concludes, “My analysis proves beyond a doubt that it would be impossible for the different letters that appear in the Obama birth certificate to have been typed by one typewriter.” He also says, “Typewriters in 1961 could not change the size and shape of a letter on the fly like that.” That basically says that it is a complete forgery. If anyone reading these words had this much evidence against them, any court in America would convict them. There are people rotting in prison cells today for such actions. Those locked up did not do anything as grave as falsifying their way into the White House, yet the law punished them. It also is important because if others knew that Obama was born in Kenya (which they surely did), then he would be a compromised leader. Those knowing his secret could use it as leverage over him. This is how blackmail works and it would go a long, long way in explaining why Obama kept so few promises. Trump has long held that Obama’s birth certificate was a fraud. Many think that compromised political pressures and the sheer distraction of the topic as he ran caused him to change his opinion publicly. The worst part of the matter is that America does not care about the facts. This is largely because the population has been dulled down so much that the most vital issues of our age are usually overlooked. Those that are smart enough to really grasp what the birther facts mean are too afraid to come out and admit it, much less combat the fallout from it. If this is permitted to stand, then at what point have we as Americans signed away our birthright and become nothing but children pretending to vote every four years? One thing is for certain. While Malik Obama claims to be a Trump supporter and to be on the side of the people, he could have done the people a lot more good had he manned up and released this almost a decade ago. Shame on you, Malik Obama, shame on you. __________________________
Valerie Jarrett - BO & MO's Girl
Jarrett from within White House May Have Launched a Watergate Style Attack on Trump During Election Blog/2016 U.S. Presidential ElectionPosted Mar 6, 2017 by Martin Armstrong I have been hearing about the Obama Administration wiretapping and trying desperately to uncover links of Trump and Puttin without success for months. Obama was desperate to blame the Russians for Hillary’s loss. I have warned that Obama’s OFA was circumventing state level Democrats. The rumor mill alleges that this was a Valerie Jarrett operation which was directed from the White House – not the Justice Department as being claimed. The Obama officials are not denying the covert operation, but are trying to paint it as a legitimate investigation of Trump launched by Lynch at the Justice Department to give deniability to Obama. Jarrett was a Senior Adviser to Obama between 2009 up until January 20th, 2017. She is a Chicago lawyer who previously has been tied to Obama and served as a co-chair of the Obama-Biden Transition Project. Jarrett has joined Obama’s effort to help with an “insurgency” movement against President Donald Trump. Rumors also imply that both Chuck Schummer and Hillary knew of this investigation and were briefed, possibly by Jarrett or others in the White House. It is clear that there was a June 2016 FISA request by the Obama administration to monitor communications involving Donald Trump and several advisers. That request was amazingly denied as too broad. The rumor is that the Court was very concerned this was a witch hunt by Obama without any evidence that was akin to Watergate. Then in October 2016 before the election, the Obama administration submitted a new request that was more narrow to the FISA court which targeted a computer server in Trump Tower they alleged would show links to Russian banks. No such evidence was found and indeed it was a witch-hunt. However, the wiretaps continued claiming it was for national security to try to distinguish this from Watergate.
NSA Director Michael Rogers participated in the sessions at Intelligence and National Security Summit in Washington. It turns out that Obama officially blamed Puttin on October 8th, 2016. Then on Thursday November 17th, 2016, Rogers traveled to New York and met with President-Elect Donald Trump after the election without informing others. Then the next day, the Washington Post reported on a recommendation in “October” that Mike Rogers be removed from his NSA position. This was a recommendation from the Pentagon and the NSA to President Obama that Rogers must be removed. This was delivered to Obama by Defense Secretary Ashton Carter and Director of National Intelligence James R. Clapper Jr. Reuters reported on November 19th, that Carter and Clapper demanded to fire Rogers. Rogers didn’t want to participate in the Obama spying scheme led by Clapper. All the information I was getting from behind the curtain warned that there was indeed a soft-coup against Trump that was organized by Obama and that Clapper was deeply involved. I warned this was being called the “Gang of Four”behind the curtain – absolutely unprecedented. Everyone knows I am very cautious not to get involved in conspiracy theories. Meanwhile, hackers are blackmailing Democrats to release other emails of their covert and illegal actions to overthrow Trump. Reports are surfacing that at least a dozen Democratic groups have been hacked demanding now a ransom and samples of sensitive data in the hackers’ possession have been leaked. One such leak involves a non-profit group using grant money to cover costs for anti-Trump protesters. If that proves correct, there is one non-profit that just committed tax fraud and that will justify 5 years in prison for all involved in that one. There appears to have been an all out effort by Democrats to undermine the government to prevent any reform process of the deep state.
We are looking at the complete meltdown of government. The Democrats have gone way too far and they need to clean house or we are looking at the complete breakdown of any decorum whatsoever. This may be why our computer is warning that private assets are the way to survive – not government. I have warned that our model projected that the Democratic Party was in a major bear market and has been making lower lows and highs since 1932. This is not being partisan or a cheerleader for the Republicans. There is something very very very wrong here and it looks like the unthinkable has taken place. If Jarrett briefed Schummer and Hillary, there is going to be a very serious crisis in government. ___________________________
Army veteran awarded $2.5M in Phoenix V-A malpractice case By: Nicole Garcia POSTED:MAR 06 2017 02:21PM MST UPDATED:MAR 07 2017 06:00AM MST PHOENIX (KSAZ) - Phoenix has been at the center of the Veterans Administration health center scandal since it broke and the issue is again in the spotlight here in the valley. On Monday, a federal judge awarded Steven Cooper $2.5 million in a malpractice lawsuit filed against the Phoenix V-A. It's a bittersweet decision for the Army veteran, who has been diagnosed with terminal cancer. Cooper calls this a huge win -- not just for him, but for other veterans who are still waiting for care at the Phoenix V-A. The judge awarded him $2.5 million for pain and suffering and lost earnings.
Army veteran awarded $2.5M in Phoenix V-A malpractice caseThis dying man took on the federal government and won. "Extremely grateful that the judge heard the concerns.. the concerns that veterans are not being treated properly at the Phoenix V-A.. she heard the proper tests and proper protocols are not happening," said Cooper. After a week-long trial, the judge ruled in favor of Cooper, who served in the U.S. Army for 18 years. Cooper went to the Phoenix V-A in 2011 complaining of abdominal pain. A nurse practitioner examined his prostate and found it was enlarged. The judge found the nurse practitioner breached the standards of care by not ordering a PSA test for Cooper and referring him to a urologist. Consequently, Cooper developed an aggressive form of prostate cancer and has undergone several surgeries and medical procedures. He has less than five years to live. "They could've made a $200 million verdict. I'm still going to die in a few years, so that's irrelevant," said Cooper. The court room, was packed with veterans and supporters as the verdict was read. Many see this as a huge win for valley veterans and Cooper says his fight against the Phoenix V-A is not over yet. "And these veterans still to this day, years after they broke the scandal, still can't get access to care at the V-A or the private sector and I will die fight 'til my last breath so these veterans can get access to decent health care," he said. __________________________
UNIVERSITY CITY, MO (KTVI) – Investigators with the University City Police Department are working to determine who knocked over or damaged dozens of headstones at a local Jewish cemetery over the weekend.Police would not say if they considered the vandalism at Chesed Shel Emeth Cemetery to be a hate crime. It is believed there was some organization behind the crime, meaning this was not the act of one individual. The tombstones vandalized are in an older section of the cemetery; much of which pre-date 1960. The damage was discovered Monday. A steady stream of people were stopping by to see if the toppled headstones belonged to any of their family members who are buried at the site. "These are holocaust survivors that are in here. They shouldn't have to endure any more trauma. Let them be settled," said Robin Rickerman whose elders including great aunts and uncles are buried at the gravesite. "I can't believe people would do that any where to anyone, it's just wrong," said Golda Burke, whose grandparents on her father's side are buried on the other side of the vandalized site. "It's not okay." she said, "It's never okay to desecrate the dead." More than 100 headstones were damaged. Police said they're reviewing security camera footage from the area. The investigation coincides with yet another round of bomb threats at Jewish community centers across the nation... __________________________
Federal Regulation Is Stifling Business BY: STEPHEN MOORE FEBRUARY 21, 2017 Stephen Moore Posted with permission from The Washington Times At the first meeting of the Trump Leadership Council - an advisory group consisting of top CEOs from major companies - President Donald Trump asked these business leaders what was their biggest problem. I expected the answer to be America's anti-growth tax system. The CEOs almost all listed the federal tax code as an albatross, but not the heaviest one. But I was surprised to learn that most insisted he biggest restraint on growth is federal red tape and regulation. Manufacturers, energy firms, financial services, agriculture interests - across all industries - federal rules were seen as mindless, inefficient, costly and incomprehensible. Mr. Trump is off to a speedy start in rolling back the rule making industry in Washington. He has signed an executive order which mandates that any agency wanting to implement a new business regulation must at the same time repeal two existing regs. This should reverse the tide of regulatory burdens. There's so much more to be done. And Congress, not just the president will have to play a lead role. Time out for a civics lesson. One of the mysteries of American government over the last half-century is why the Congress has acceded so much law-making authority to what is now a questionable constitutional fourth branch of government. These agencies ranging from the SEC to the FTC to the FDA and dozens more have become fiefdoms that reign over private industries. They are effectively accountable to no one - and certainly not to Congress. But, of course, Congress is supposed to make the laws - not unelected bureaucrats at the EPA or the CFTC. In the last decade or so, most of the big laws that affect private industry and consumers have been enacted by non-lawmakers. The excuse from Congress is that there are so many rules and regulations that the House and Senate can't possibly approve everyone of them. Well it's true there are tens of thousand of these edicts. But isn't that the crux of the problem? A bigger problem is that agencies have become arrogant with power and desensitized to the impact of their litany of "thou shalls" and "thou shall nots." Martha Kent of OSHA once put the attitude of these bureaucrats succinctly: "As long as I'm regulating, I'm happy." She said she "absolutely loves" putting out "a reg" and that she was "born to regulate." This sounds like someone who is clueless about private industry. But who will stop bureaucrats like this who are drunk with power? A new analysis by my colleague Jason Pye at Freedom Works finds that under Barack Obama there were well over 500 new regulations with costs to the economy of more than $100 million each. That means these imposed a minimum of $50 billion of cost to the economy. How many of these were overturned by a mostly Republican Congress? Exactly zero. The solution is a law that requires congressional approval before a regulation takes place. If I had my way, each and every new rule would only take effect after a vote of approval by the House and Senate. If they have to stay up until midnight to do it, so be it. That's what we pay these people for. At the very least, the Regulations in Need of Scrutiny Act or "The REINS Act" would require congressional approval of any rule with a cost of $100 million to workers, employers, or consumers. The CEOS on the Trump Leadership Council who called regulation the greatest threat to American prosperity weren't making this stuff up. A 2010 study by the Small Business Administration estimated regulations cost small businesses $1.75 trillion a year. That's more than the entire annual output of Pennsylvania and Ohio combined. This is a gigantic tax on the American economy - like a second income tax - sapping us of strength. The regulators enjoy doing it, and it will continue unabated unless Congress stops complaining about regulation and actually does something about it. • Stephen Moore is an economic adviser to Freedom Works and a CNN senior economic analyst. __________________________