What's Next Aileen?
Presentations And Interviews
TVCM Presents: New Interviews and Special Events ... Check it out...
The Villages Conservative Media
We have been inundated with overwhelming support to my message on Tuesday calling for the removal of Ilhan Omar from Congress! In addition, PJTN hosted a press briefing for the 4,000+ global media professionals at the National Religious Broadcasters Convention to call on President Donald Trump to charge the Attorney General Barr to launch an investigation into Omar’s nefarious relationships with Muslim Brotherhood terrorist front groups.
Who Wants to Be Free?
You are designed for freedom!
If you are a Christian in America wondering if you should know what is going on in your government, about leaders who represent you or whether to vote in elections, the answer is a resounding YES!
Special Meeting - SECO ENERGY District # 3 Trustee Election
May 13, 2019
Savanah Recreation Center
1575 Buena Vista Blvd,
The Villages, FL 32162
Registration - Voting & Meeting begins at 4:30 PM
“A” - Aileen Milton - SECO Trustee Candidate
Please Vote and Support - Aileen Milton, District 3 - Resident and Member since 1995
Endorsed by Richard (Dick) Belles, Most Recent and Former District 3 Trustee
Aileen brings her previous experience as a Certified Property Manager (CPM) with both commercial and residential real estate with knowledge of preventative maintenance issues including storm prep and clean up. Also, the development of multi-million dollar budgets, and asset management oversight.
Aileen was the Founder, Co-founder and President of a non-profit organization and website media group while moderating weekly meetings including local, national and international speakers with filming, doing interviews and broadcasting Live events on the many current issues facing our communities.
Hard work, community involvement, communications, customer service and satisfaction to keep earning the J.D. Power Award among South Midsize Utilities will be my top priority for District 3 and the entire SECO Energy Membership.
Refreshments served during registration
SECO Business presentation and election results 6:00 PM
With tens of thousands of signatures gathered on our petition demanding the removal of Ilhan Omar from Congress, PJTN is now adding the names of Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Rashida Tlaib to our “recall from Congress” mandate. Daily, it becomes more and more obvious that this trio is working in unison to achieve one and the same goal: To diminish both Israel and the very America they were elected to defend and protect.
Ocasio-Cortez is being called out by PJTN for trivializing the memory of the Holocaust. In an ill-informed tweet, she defended Omar by using a famous statement by Pastor Martin Niemoeller. Niemoeller spoke out in defense of the innocent victims of the Holocaust against the Nazi government. The use of this comparison was staggering. Omar is a collaborator of the Muslim Brotherhood which historically supported the Nazis then, and is aggressively seeking the destruction of Israel and America now.
Ocasio-Cortez’s tweet appeared on April 13th after President Trump tweeted a video of Omar belittling the 9/11 attacks at a Muslim Brotherhood (CAIR sponsored) terrorist fundraising event in which she described the worst terror attack on American soil as “some people, did something”.
Are Ocasio-Cortez, Omar and Tlaib just an unfortunate example of the growing number of uneducated graduates from U.S. schools that are totally unaware of history? God help us if it were that simple! I fear it is much worse as we see a Goebbels-style media propaganda war unfolding in order to re-write history to fit their agenda.
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez is a traitor to her Sephardic Jewish ancestors and the memory of all of us from Hispania whose ancestors were tortured and murdered during the Spanish Inquisition. Her tweet equating the President’s criticism of Ilhan Omar with Nazi-era Jews facing extermination by the Third Reich is absolutely pathetic! Not only was her statement not befitting of a U.S. lawmaker, but it is also an embarrassment to our ancestors and shows her lack of education. Americans of Hispanic/Latino descent need to join me in calling her out!
The President has taken the first step by making his voice heard on the issue. Now it’s time for him to act to oust them from Congress. We are still awaiting an investigation by the Justice Department into Ilhan Omar’s fundraising activities for the Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR) and Islamic Relief USA (IRUSA) -- both Muslim Brotherhood front groups.
As a descendant of Sephardic Jewish immigrants, I refuse to stand by while these women perpetuate a climate of anti-Semitism. They do not speak for immigrants, for women or for the under-privileged. Ocasio-Cortez is a disgrace to Latinos, a disgrace to women and a disgrace to America. It’s time these three anti-Semitic uneducated women were marched out of Congress once and for all.
Please go to PJTN’s website today—our petition is now growing this new mandate!
We will continue to have our voice heard – and we are depending on your support of as little as $20/month to make all we do possible.
Donate to PJTN TodayThank you, in advance, for making your best donation today!
President/Proclaiming Justice to The Nations
Preliminary Thoughts on the 2019 Races
April 16, 2019/in Political Analysis, The Hawthorn Group /
To Hawthorn Friends & Family --
In the absence of any recent musing by us on the political scene (what, we ask ourselves, could possibly need to be said that isn’t already being said, over and over?), to my utter amazement I’ve been getting emails from folks asking if they’ve been dropped from our distribution lists and actually asking for our current thoughts.
I’m not sure there is much to add to what, as noted, is being said, but in the interest of at least highlighting items that we’ve noted recently, let me share:
And that wisdom applies not only to totals, but also to SIZE of gifts and number of true small donors. Not even Bernie Sanders – or Elizabeth Warren, who has eschewed major contributions – can begin to approach 99% small donors. That’s an impressive base of voters and potential volunteers (IF the Trump campaign can figure out how to use them to localize and personalize the Trump message).
Where is all this money coming from? Seniors are part of the answer. See this week’s story from Axios where Trump is targeting Seniors on Facebook over other age demographics.
I was also reminded of Deep Throat’s wise admonition reading a MoScout story this week about Missouri Democratic State Auditor – and the party’s best hope for a gubernatorial candidate in 2020 – Nicole Galloway’s fundraising. It noted she had “raised $144,194, not too far from the amount raised by Mike Parson, the sitting governor, $198,931.”
BUT as MoScout noted – and God IS in the details (of finances AND politics) – “If she dives into this race, Galloway will have to redouble her fundraising because Team Parson holds a big money lead. His campaign committee has more than $1 million cash on-hand (Galloway has $65K COH) and Parson’s allied PAC, Uniting Missouri, has $2.3 million on-hand.”
There is a WORLD of difference between trailing in recent fundraising by only $50,000 and trailing in cash on-hand by $3.2 million.
In this rapidly changing world of politics, “Follow the money” remains unchanged.
As University of Virginia’s Larry Sabato pointed out recently in his always “must read” Crystal Ball, “almost two-thirds of the total number of pledged delegates will be awarded in the first seven weeks of the nominating season, from February 3, 2020 through March 17, 2020.”
Indeed, as he points out (and we highlight the MAJOR states), in only two weeks, between Super Tuesday (California, North Carolina, Texas, Virginia) on March 3rd, thru March 10th (Michigan and Ohio), thru March 17th (Florida and Illinois), 60% of the Democratic delegates will be awarded.
It is, of course, NOT certain at all there will be an early winner. Iowa and New Hampshire – grossly NON-representative of the Democrats’ voting base – don’t account for all that many delegates and Sanders or Warren may have a “lock” on neighboring New Hampshire.
Minorities start appearing at the polls in Nevada and, massively, in South Carolina (each also in other ways non-representative of the rest of America).
Among the big early states, Sen. Kamala Harris may have a lock on California, Beto O’Rourke on Texas and Warren on Massachusetts . . . leaving the big early battleground states of Florida, Illinois, Michigan, North Carolina, Ohio and Virginia.
Two other interesting changes this year:
In his last report, the inimitable Charlie Cook viewed NONE of the Republican seats a “Lean Democrat” or “Toss-Up” . . . and only three as “Lean Republican” (the rest being “Likely Republican” or “Solid Republican”). He counts those three “Lean Republican” seats as Arizona (McSally), Colorado (Gardner) and Maine (Collins, whose DEMOCRAT colleague from West Virginia, Joe Manchin, has already endorsed her). Any of the three COULD become a serious race, but not without a serious challenger, which each currently lacks. While Sen. Collins does not have an opponent yet, Democratic fury at her Kavanaugh vote has already raised over $3 million to her future opponent.
Of the 13 Democratic seats, Charlie considers 11 of them safe for re-election, two “Likely D” and nine “Solid D.” However, he lists one – Doug Jones’ seat in Alabama – as “Toss Up.”
While I’ve learned the perils of disagreeing with Charlie, I’d push it farther to the GOP, to at least “Lean Republican” if not “Likely Republican.” Jones beat the infamous Roy Moore by 21,924 votes in his special election runoff that saw 22,852 write-in votes posted (mostly by Republicans disgusted with Moore, such as the senior Senator, Richard Shelby). It is a state President Trump carried by 62.08% to 34.06%. There are NO Democrats in statewide office. A pathetically weak GOP candidate for governor won in 2018 with 59.5% of the vote. Doug Jones is a quietly but strongly impressive public servant and a solid candidate, but his prospects are dim in that state.
So, instead of gaining the two seats they need to take the majority, we believe the Democrats will actually LOSE one seat and the GOP will keep the Senate.
We agree with Charlie and see little change among Governors . . . indeed, we’d call Kentucky as “Likely Republican.” The incumbent seems likely to hold on to Louisiana and we don’t know enough about Montana to have a view.
Of course, President Trump will be ON the ballot in 2020, a HUGE change from 2018. And it’s clear House members – from Speaker Pelosi to the young firebrands – will be major attack targets for the President.
That little town in the tumultuous years before (and just after) the Civil War that was family home to three governors of Missouri, up the road from the farm of the state’s embattled chief justice, and (in the person of one of America’s most famous artists, George Caleb Bingham), home for a state treasurer and state adjutant general . . . all citizens – not professional career politicians – willing to serve in high public office in horribly difficult times.
Appealing for similar citizen involvement today, I intend to quote – with apologies for its male-gender foucs, typical of the era in which it was written – a poem by Josiah Gilbert Holland:
GOD, give us men!
A time like this demands
Strong minds, great hearts, true faith and ready hands;
Men whom the lust of office does not kill;
Men whom the spoils of office can not buy;
Men who possess opinions and a will;
Men who have honor; men who will not lie;
Men who can stand before a demagogue
And damn his treacherous flatteries without winking!
Tall men, sun-crowned, who live above the fog
In public duty, and in private thinking;
For while the rabble, with their thumb-worn creeds,
Their large professions and their little deeds,
Mingle in selfish strife, lo! Freedom weeps,
Wrong rules the land and waiting Justice sleeps.
Muslim Activist Calls Out ‘Disgrace’ Ilhan Omar in Brutal Op-EdMuslim Activist Has Brutal Words For Ilhan Omar
BY BENJAMIN ARIE
PUBLISHED APRIL 16, 2019 AT 12:34AM
If you listen to the left, the only people who are criticizing Rep. Ilhan Omar are racists and anti-Muslim bigots. Some liberal figures have rushed to defend the Somali-born congresswoman from Minnesota, pointing fingers even as Omar continues to make questionable remarks.
But if the Muslim lawmaker is only under fire because of her background, it’s hard to explain Qanta Ahmed. This week, Ahmed penned a thoughtful Op-Ed piece for Fox News which broke the liberal narrative by calling out Omar as a fellow Muslim woman herself.
“Ilhan Omar is a disgrace to Islam and doesn’t represent my Muslim religion,” Ahmed — a medical doctor and foreign relations activist — wrote in her piece.
“Omar continues to be an embarrassment and a disgrace for me and other American Muslims with her outrageous, ignorant, anti-Semitic and now anti-American comments,” she ranted.
Ahmed was referencing a string of seemingly ignorant and stereotypical statements made by the Minnesota liberal. The most recent gaffe involved Omar referring to the Muslim attackers behind 9/11 as “some people (who) did something.”
The respected activist called out her fellow Muslim not only for her ignorance, but also for her appalling attempt to downplay the September 11 terrorist attack and link to radical Islam.
“Omar’s grotesque trivialization of a national tragedy amounts to an explicit denial of 9/11 — a desecration of all the lives erased that awful day,” Ahmed blasted. “This denial is inexplicable unless she has strong and covert Islamist sympathies.”
Advertisement - story continues below
She said that trivialization was particularly insulting to her as a medical doctor, who continues to see the real-world impact of that Islamic terrorist attack on the people of New York.
“I see the burden of Sept. 11 on a regular basis, treating brave and selfless first responders who still suffer from complex sleep disorders — including post-traumatic stress — that I specialize in treating,” Ahmed explained.
“In her dismissal of Sept. 11, Omar callously erased the deep suffering of every survivor and family I attend, and everyone else still impacted by the terrorist attacks,” she added.
She went on to point out that people like Omar seem to be using their Islamic backgrounds to gain victimhood points, but that this narrative falls apart.
“The greatest obscenity in the lie that Omar pedals is that she — along with millions of other Muslims in America — is somehow victimized,” Ahmed wrote. “Do not believe this.”
There are two big points here. The first, of course, is that Qanta Ahmed is right. It’s shocking for any American — regardless of their religion — to downplay or sugarcoat what happened on September 11, but even more alarming when it’s a U.S. elected official doing it.
And that’s the second, perhaps larger point: The left has veered so far from the mainstream that one of their celebrated voices is now flirting dangerously close to terrorism denial. The fact that we’re at that point — and that so many liberals refuse to call out Omar — is incredible.
That’s before even discussing the bigoted references and stereotypes parroted by Omar in the past. Where were the voices of American liberals then? In the case of Nancy Pelosi, they were making bizarre excuses about how one of their own party members doesn’t know what her words mean.
It shouldn’t just be one brave Op-Ed piece by a successful and thoughtful Muslim American. It should be a chorus of voices of all backgrounds agreeing that the truth matters, and being honest about the reality of 9/11 is the least we as a nation can do.
We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.
Summary More Info Recent Posts Contact
Benjamin Arie is an independent journalist and writer. He has personally covered everything ranging from local crime to the U.S. president as a reporter in Michigan, before focusing on national politics. Ben frequently travels to Latin America and has spent years living in Mexico.Follow Benjamin on Facebook
Gun Ownership Isn't Just About the Weapon
Top Republican Says Democrats are Supporting “Murder” By Denying Care to Babies Who Survive Abortions NATIONAL STEVEN ERTELT APR 9, 2019 | 4:36PM WASHINGTON, DC
A top Republican in Congress says Democrats are supporting murder because they are refusing to allow a vote on a bill that will provide life-saving medical care and treatment to babies who survive abortions.
This is perhaps the first time the number two Republican in the House of Representatives has gone beyond talking about how Democrats support infanticide — to say that they literally support murder. Watch the video below to see Congressman Steve Scalise’s response to a question from CNS News:
At the U.S. Capitol on Tuesday, CNSNews.com asked Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.): “The Born-Alive Abortion Survivor Protection Act says that a baby who survives an abortion must receive immediate medical care and be admitted to a hospital. Do you believe that denying such care constitutes infanticide?”
SIGN THE PETITION: Stop Infanticide! Stop Abortions Up to Birth!
McCarthy deferred to Minority Whip Scalise who has been spearheading the drive to get a House vote on the Born-Alive Abortion Survivor Protection Act.
Scalise said, “Well, first of all, when you look at what New York ushered in, the law that allows for infanticide – literally, I mean, it’s murder.”
“To me, if a baby is born alive outside the womb, we’re not even having a discussion on abortion anymore,” he said. “We’re having a discussion about whether a human being has the ability to live or can someone can kill that baby?”
Scalise continued, “It should be murder if they kill that baby, and so, infanticide. And so, we’re pushing to get a vote on this bill to give protection to every baby who is born alive.”
Yesterday, Nancy Pelosi and House Democrats continued to refuse a request to allow a vote on the Born Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act, legislation that would stop infanticide and provide medical care and treatment for babies who survive abortions.
House Democrats refused a vote on the bill for the 30th time — reading the same statement they have read the previous 29 occasions that claims there is no bipartisan agreement to bring the bill up for a vote. Despite the claim, Republican leaders have repeatedly asked Pelosi and top Democrats to reach an agreement for the bill to receive a vote.
This is the 32nd time in total that Congressional Democrats thwarted an attempt by Republicans to vote on a bill that would provide medical care and treatment for babies who provide survived failed abortions — 30 times in the House and twice in the Senate.
Rep.Ralph Norman, a South Carolina Republican, offered the unanimous consent request to allow a vote on the anti-infanticide bill but Democrats, as shown below, ruled it out of order. As they have done numerous times, after Democrats denied his request to vote on the bill, they cut off Congressman Norman’s microphone so he could not object to their denying a vote.
After his request was blocked, he tweeted: “For a party that’s so bold about being pro-abortion, the Democratic leadership is certainly doing all they can to protect their members from the repercussions of that position.”
Last week, Republican Whip Steve Scalise and Representative Ann Wagner moved forward with a discharge petition to force Speaker Pelosi to schedule a vote. That’s a petition any member of Congress can sign to allow legislation to move out of committee and to the House floor when the party controlling Congress refuses to allow a vote on it.
So far, 199 members have signed on, including three Democrats.
The blocking of a vote on a bill to stop infanticide come even as national polling shows Americans — including people who are “pro-choice” on abortion — oppose abortion up to birth and infanticide. And doctors indicate abortions are never needed to protect a woman’s health and women admit having abortions on healthy babies.
And a new poll finds a massive 17 percent shift in the pro-life direction after Democrats have pushed abortions up to birth and infanticide nationally.
H.R. 962, the Born Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act, introduced by Rep. Ann Wagner (R-MO), ensures that a baby born alive after a failed or attempted abortion receives the same medical care as any other newborn. It would also penalize doctors who allow such infants to die or who intentionally kill a newborn following a failed abortion.
Every single Democrat in the Senate who is running for president voted against a bill that would stop infanticide and provide medical care and treatment for babies who are born alive after botched abortions. That includes Bernie Sanders, Kamala Harris, Cory Booker, Elizabeth Warren, Kirsten Gillibrand, and Amy Klobuchar.
While they all voted to support infanticide, President Trump spoke out against infanticide in two tweets saying that it’s nothing short of “executing” babies to let them die after failed abortions.
ACTION: Contact members of Congress and urge them to sign the Discharge Petition to bring the Born Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act to the House floor for a vote.
Conversations That Matter, with Stuart McNish
Published on Jun 22, 2015
We’re in a carbon drought. That is according to Professor William Happer of Princeton University. The renowned physicist says when it comes to carbon dioxide, there’s more good than bad. He goes on to say most of carbon dioxide’s effect has already happened. He points to the logarithmic dependence of temperature on carbon dioxide levels. Happer says the unique properties of carbon dioxide mean that current levels would need to double for another one-degree increase in temperature and they’d have to double again for another one degree rise. --- Simon Fraser University’s Centre for Dialogue presents Conversations That Matter. Join veteran Broadcaster Stuart McNish each week for an important and engaging Conversation about the issues shaping our future.
85-year-old Pro-Lifer Savagely Beaten Outside Planned Parenthood Clinic
April 2, 2019
EDITOR’S NOTE: Facebook is cracking down on Conservative content. Many of you have complained that you never see our content in your news feeds. There’s only one way to fight back — and that’s by subscribing to my FREE weekly newsletter. Click here.
An elderly pro-lifer was brutally beaten while he was praying outside of a Planned Parenthood clinic in San Francisco.
“Old man, stay on the ground,” the thug said.
An 85-year-old pro-lifer was beaten outside a Planned Parenthood abortion mill in San Francisco.Investigators say the suspect snatched a banner the pro-lifer was holding and tried to get away. The 85-year-old victim used a stick to stop the guy.
“I tried to keep him from taking it and that was it,” the victim told NBC News. “Then he knocked me down and kicked me.”
The attack was captured on video:
Ian Cull✔@NBCianNEW: Video shows 85-year-old man getting kicked outside of a Planned Parenthood in #SanFrancisco. SFPD investigating. Hear from the 85-year-old about what happened, at 11 on @nbcbayarea.
The victim is a member of 40 Days For Life, a pro-life advocacy group that conducts silent prayer demonstrations outside Planned Parenthood abortion mills.
This was reportedly the third time the suspect had harassed and bullied pro-lifers at the San Francisco clinic. The victim was treated for minor injuries.
Pro-life ‘Unplanned’ movie receives R-rating… likely for violence of abortion
By Nancy Flanders |
February 22, 2019 , 05:46pm
Unplanned, the movie of the life story of Abby Johnson, a former Planned Parenthood worker turned pro-life activist, has unexpectedly received an R-rating from the Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA). The MPAA cites the reasoning for the rating as “some disturbing/bloody images” but Ben Kayser of Movie Guide has stated that other 2019 films that include killing, murder, and death have only received a rating of PG-13.
While Unplanned features simulated abortion scenes that include blood, it doesn’t contain any of the MPAA cautions for profanity, nudity, or sex. Therefore, the MPAA decision to give the film an R-rating is quite possibly because of the abortion scenes — and the MPAA’s opinion that these scenes depict violence. The rating essentially means that the MPAA is (perhaps unintentionally) supporting the pro-life community’s long-held argument that abortion is an act of violence against innocent human life — one pro-lifers believe should be illegal.
READ: ‘Unplanned’ star shocked by mother’s revelation: ‘I was going to abort you’
In addition to stating the obvious – that abortion is an act of violence – the R-rating sets up quite a hypocritical situation for pro-abortion organizations and leaders. The bizarre situation is that teens in many states can legally undergo an abortion without a parent’s permission, but won’t be able to see a movie about abortion without a parent’s permission: ‘Dear teenage girls, you are mature enough to have this violent act done to you and your child and your parents don’t need to know, but you can’t see a movie about it without your parents saying it’s okay.’
Planned Parenthood works overtime to fight and overturn laws concerning parental notification for abortion, so it’s ironic that teenage girls can’t enter a movie about Planned Parenthood without parental notification.
The writers/directors of Unplanned — Cary Solomon and Chuck Konzelman — aren’t worried about the R-rating, although it may stop teenage girls who should see the movie from seeing the movie. In their opinion, it’s a film teens should see with their parents.
“But, maybe it’s all for the best: As the wife of our lead film attorney put it: ‘This is a movie that every mother of a teenage girl needs to take her daughter by the hand and go see with her.’ So as far as we’re concerned, ‘R’ means ‘Recommended,'” they said as reported by Movie Guide. They say they don’t plan on fighting the R-rating.
Unplanned is scheduled to be released in theaters on March 29, 2019.
Photo(s) of the Week
President Trump gives a hug and kiss to Jordan McLinn who suffers from muscular dystrophy before signing the “Right to Try Act.” This is OUR PRESIDENT! #RightToTryAct
A Significant Crisis
FBI & DOJ?
Quote of the Week
“A liberal’s paradise would be a place where
everybody has guaranteed employment, free
comprehensive healthcare, free education,
free food, free housing, free clothing, free utilities,
and only law enforcement has guns.
And believe it or not, such a place does indeed
already exist in the USA :
It's called Prison.”
Sheriff Joe Arpaio
"Once again, it is incredible how Obama and the progressive liberals, with the help of mainstream media can so easily convince the American people that a lie is the truth and the truth is a lie. In fact, it would be dazzling if it weren't so disturbing." Plundered by Michael S. Coffman, Ph.D.
“No war is over until the enemy says it’s over. We may think it over, we may declare it over, but in fact, the enemy gets a vote.” --General James Mattis
The Villages Tea Party Contributing Editors:
The Villages Conservative Media
Aileen Milton, Webmaster
Silence is no longer an option...
"Freedom of Speech - Can be lost through Self Imposed SILENCE"
- Aileen Milton, Founder The Villages Conservative Media and President, The Villages Tea Party
"Freedom of Speech - Can be lost through Self Imposed SILENCE"
- Aileen Milton, Founder The Villages Conservative Media and President, The Villages Tea Party